Jan van Gemert

Jan van Gemert

@jvgemert.bsky.social

Head of the Computer Vision lab; TU Delft. - Fundamental, empirical, understanding-based, Deep Learning research - Visual inductive priors for data efficiency Web: https://jvgemert.github.io/

1.3K followers249 following262 posts

I really enjoy finding gaps in our understanding of text-book deep learning. The RNN Homunculus: Long-range input vanishes RNN gradients. Gates (GRU, LSTM) help, but gates are themselves an RNN. Ie: gates are not sufficient. We need short-range data to learn gates first. arxiv.org/abs/2610.14279

Jan van Gemert reposted

I'm not sure I agree with @giorgio.gilest.ro's logic that this ends up with technofeudalism. Yes LLM-written papers are flooding journals, but that's because journals are and always were a bad tool for filtering for insight. Our response should be to try something different.

Richard Sever@richardsever.bsky.social

"All corners of academia will soon be flooded with AI-generated research....Maths and CS go first because their entire output is symbol manipulation...Biology comes later not because biologists are cleverer but because the rate-limiting step is physical" giorgio.gilest.ro/the-weimar-o...

Jan van Gemert reposted

I'm burnt out of discussing "AI". I don't care for the press releases from big companies. I hate having to comment immediately. I dislike "hot takes". I'm worried we, as scientists, are losing touch with scientific values. We've become customers, salivating at ads marketed to investors. 1/15

@eccv.bsky.social #ECCV2026 How can I organize which posters to see where? The app cuts off paper titles (ie: unreadable and unusable). The website's schedule is great, but has no poster IDs next to the titles. Will we get a handy hardcopy program, with titles, times, and ids?

Jan van Gemert reposted

Computer vision people, where are you??? 👀

Evangelos Kazakos@ekazakos.bsky.social

Welcome to the ECCV 2026 feed! Post and discuss ECCV 2026 papers, workshops, tutorials, talks, and social events. Use #ECCV2026 to make sure your post appears (other variants work too, e.g. #eccv). Link: bsky.app/profile/ekaz.... Please pin 📌 and share! Thanks! Made by @ekazakos.bsky.social.

Jan van Gemert reposted

NEW PAPER. Why do larger networks train better? "Because they contain more candidate *sub*networks that can learn the task" → lottery tickets This popular explanation uses an appealing but misleading metaphor🧵 We propose an intuitive alternative grounded in theory: escape dimensions

Jan van Gemert reposted

I'm taking this opportunity to make some advertising for an ECCV Workshop on empirical theory proposed by @jvgemert.bsky.social empiricaltheory.github.io Yes it's related. Think harder. You can connect the dots, I have faith in you 😉

empiricaltheory.github.io E.T. : Empirical Theory in Representation Learning Phoning home to science
David Picard@davidpicard.eurosky.social

Just learned someone made a video about an old paper of mine! Pretty cool I must say 🙃 www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdoH...

Jan van Gemert reposted

"Science is not simply a sequence of tasks that can be optimized....The scientific system thrives on inefficiency: redundant efforts, failed attempts, and divergent paths. These are not costs to be eliminated but sources of discovery." Excellent essay! ⬇️ www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

science.orgProgression without progressProgress in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to advance scientific discovery has made it increasingly realistic to envision automated “end-to-end science” (ETES) systems: integrated pipelines t...

Thanks for the fast response; I know it's annoying, and seems unnecessary, and extra work.. and, if needed, I will go along with it, of course, but I just wonder if we can start to change our dependencies one small step at a time..

Jan van Gemert reposted

We're looking for a new colleague at @amlab.bsky.social: Assistant Professor in AI for Science 🔬🤖 World-class ML research, Amsterdam's thriving AI ecosystem (ELLIS, startups, big tech), and some of the best academic labor conditions in Europe ❤️ Deadline: May 30 👉 werkenbij.uva.nl/en/vacancies...

werkenbij.uva.nlVacancy — Assistant Professor in AI for Science (AI4Science)<p><span>Are you passionate about advancing Machine Learning by integrating insights from the natural sciences? Are you eager to bridge the 3rd (<em><span>computational</span></em>) and 4th (<em><span...

Jan van Gemert reposted

- The bitter lesson: Richard Sutton's view on AI - The butter lesson: more butter makes better food @gracekind.net - The batter lesson: crêpes are better than pancakes - The better lesson: AI can potentially improve teaching - The botter lesson: genAI takes over social media

Jan van Gemert reposted

Writing forces your brain to coordinate memory, reasoning, and meaning-making simultaneously. Every time you write, you rewire toward clearer thinking. Every time you let an LLM do it, you rewire toward consumption.

Jan van Gemert reposted

Replying to @nsaphra.bsky.social

Bibliography cleanup is known to be harder than AGI. Same with successfully connecting a laptop with a projector. It's what we humans will be doing long after the robot takeover. 😇

Jan van Gemert reposted

I'd like to propose the following norm for peer review of papers. If a paper shows clear signs of LLM-generated errors that were not detected by the author, the paper should be immediately rejected. My reasoning: 1/ #ResearchIntegrity

Interesting take on the role of publication venues.

Oded Rechavi@odedrechavi.bsky.social

The idea is to decouple the journals from the review step. They’ll still exist, but they’ll need to add other value. They’ll highlight, curate, add new perspectives. If they do a good job they can still be prestigious (like Scientific American or Wired) (1.2) 👇

Jan van Gemert reposted

Meet @dimadamen.bsky.social, Prof of Computer Vision at the @bristoluni.bsky.social 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 & ELLIS Fellow working in Multimodal Learning Systems. She aims to inspire more women to lead in #AI by highlighting more role models. Discover her career milestones and goals for the field. #WomenInELLIS

This ambitious line of work is a great example of empirical theory in deep learning! I think we need more empirical theory in ML/DL (in contrast what ML people call 'theory', which is math, but not empirical 🙂). Metascience for ml 🙂 metascienceforml.github.io

metascienceforml.github.io Metascience for Machine Learning A repository for collecting information about Metascience for machine learning.
Phillip Isola@phillipisola.bsky.social

Over the past year, my lab has been working on fleshing out theory + applications of the Platonic Representation Hypothesis. Today I want to share two new works on this topic: Eliciting higher alignment: arxiv.org/abs/2510.02425 Unpaired learning of unified reps: arxiv.org/abs/2510.08492 1/9

Jan van Gemert reposted

Replying to @davidpicard.eurosky.social

Now you can either do 2 things: Adding more coils, bigger magnets, an iron core, and engineering all that until you get a useful product that changes the world. Or you can try to understand what is going on, like Michael Faraday did and as later James Clerk Maxwell formalized. I want the latter.