Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets

Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets

@kamonjonas.bsky.social

Cycling fan, amateur programmer, history Ph.D., Episcopalian, liberal, patriot If you don't support open borders, you don't love America. If you don't love America, you're on the side of the fascists.

164 followers870 following1.2K posts

Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets reposted

Replying to @juliapoe.bsky.social

the knee-jerk nature of so much WNBA discourse really sidelines fans from leveling legitimate criticism at the most gendered disparity in women's sports — the *extreme* lack of bureaucratic aptitude within these front offices and ownership groups

Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets reposted

Replying to @fubarchitect.com

it's weird because the implicit frame of "no one asked for this" is that markets transmit information with perfect reliability, and most of the people who say that will deny that markets transmit information well at all in other contexts

Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets reposted

It's crazy that learning styles, which are basically astrology, are treated as completely legitimate by everyone, including many education professionals

Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets reposted

Replying to @danacorn.bsky.social

Part of it comes from a very modern internet-era left-wing notion that our only sins are that which we do, not that which we leave undone. Inaction is always morally neutral, which is awfully convenient.

Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets reposted

Some staggeringly daft responses to this one along the lines of "you can't expect everyone to understand convertible notes accounting", when the actual point is "if you don't understand accounting, then why not shut up instead of posting something stupid"

Zach Weinersmith@zachweinersmith.bsky.social

Are we gonna do this, Bluesky? Are we all just gonna not understand accounting? 72B$ of the 80B$ is convertible notes. They became greater liabilities because the company's valuation skyrocketed. They don't have an 80B$ loss in the sense that almost everyone here is imagining.

Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets reposted

Replying to @fwordleproblems.bsky.social

I want the fire department, not the slop department. Horses are alive and have a soul, firetrucks just mimic movement and perform their best guess based on your steering.

Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets reposted

Replying to @maxdubler.com

“We were out there protesting and then the elections changed things and a lot of the people protesting got seats at the table and began the long process of changing things and then all we were left with is lifelong malcontents whose strategy was protesting & not voting to upend the duopoly.”

Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets reposted

Replying to @cyanescens.bsky.social

There wasn’t enough there there to sustain momentum when the novelty wore off & it got chilly out There are serious police reform activists still plugging away at the problem & we do really need deep reforms to policing; but that requires sustained, boring, thankless work, not chants & vandalism

Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets reposted

I guess this is my main hobby horse by this point, but the “not my job to change any minds” part is consumer thinking or classroom logic, you’re not thinking like a citizen or neighbor, or any way like a member of a body. You being right, someone else being wrong, and waiting on a third to fix it.

Snowden St.@snowden.st

my kinda spicy take is that a lot of liberals have had this vibe for decades, and it's basically how their theory of improving civil rights would go. The era of SCOTUS-enforced liberalism kinda stuck a lot of folks in "change the rules, punish people, not my job to change any minds,"

Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets reposted

Historians are the reddit field because every monograph has a several pages where the author very specifically defines a term and acknowledges there's other definitions but says those are irrelevant because if someone cannot engage with you intellectually on those terms they're just a troll

Sam (ABeardedPanda)@abeardedpanda.bsky.social

It's honestly really annoying how many arguments stem from "I am using the commonly accepted definition of a term used in this field that I study" and a bunch of people tell you the definition is stupid and so are you for using it

Wordcel in the Streets, Bloodless Quant in the Sheets reposted

"Parents' Rights" is code for legal permission for child abuse. It's really that simple.

This post is unavailable.