This is why I say that in the age of AI, it is imperative to be pro-human.
Accuracy is not the measure of the value of literature. It is whether your intended audience, other humans, feel seen, recognized, moved by your work. This is what makes work human.
This is not something AI can capture.
Nicola@nicodel.bsky.socialOn the methodology, we should reject this kind of article immediately. Even accepting AI detection on its face, accuracy is not 100%. Without other proofs this is not investigative journalism, this is feeding the program material until you get a positive to smear.
A positive that is bound to happen