Mike reposted
Mike
Mike
@mikech.bsky.social
Frequently confused for a network that played music videos
76 followers517 following535 posts
How the fuck does anyone listen to this guy, hell even just do what I did and play it silently while reading the captions and looking at his manner of speaking, and think he is worth taking seriously. It's like he's internally screaming something he knows he can't say out loud.
re: omarchy trying to create parallel infra to subvert the linux community and kick trans/female/black people out i know some people think that sounds crazy but DHH literally is doing a podcast tour saying that is exactly what he's doing lol
Mike reposted
Mike reposted
Mike reposted
Mike reposted
Mike reposted
Mike reposted
Not a Wayne fan, but I salute the honesty to admit that you don't know the words to your own songs. hiphopdx.com/news/lil-way...
Mike reposted
So, the big brands re-empowering Twitter's influence. @warcraft.bsky.social was one of the few products that had a Bsky presence even when it was invite only, and they used to post everything they did on their Twitter. Then they pulled back to just memes. Now they haven't posted in a month.
One thing I'm surprised more people don't recognize is that one of the Beatles classics is just them doing a Weird Al Yankovic on a band that they were tired of being compared to.
That whole Acapella style backing on a rock album sounds corny, especially since a good number of the time they sound like sheep (baa baa baa, Barbara Ann). Even the damn Beatles dunked on them at the time. Back In The USSR is supposed to be California Girls from the Mirror Universe.
It would also be cool if artists whose work is all sexually suggestive, would still use the sexually suggestive label, as opposed to saying "just unfollow if you don't want to see." What I might consent to viewing at home is not something I want to see while scrolling in the middle of Steak n Shake.
INFLUX OF NEW PEOPLE FROM TWITTER: FOLLOW THESE STEPS TO SEE THE PORN AND FOR PEOPLE POSTING PORN, PLEASE CLICK THE SHIELD IN THE UPPER RIGHT CORNER NEXT TO THE "POST" BUTTON TO TAG YOUR STUFF APPROPRIATELY SO THAT PEOPLE WHO DON'T WANT TO SEE FAT DICKS DON'T HAVE TO
This is useful. I've had Reply Anxiety because of Bluesky's decision that discussions involving only one person you follow must be relevant to your interests. Not as invasive as Twitter thinking you want to see the photos your Senator liked, but still.
Did you know that you can choose how many replies show up in your Bluesky feed? Without getting all up in peoples' junk? You can create a threshold of how popular a reply must be before the site treats it like a new post and shows it to you. It's true! Give it a try!