i am inviting anyone from a legacy media organization to explain to me why the house judiciary dems report on trump’s epstein’s ties and multiple allegations of rape isn’t worthy of extensively reporting on. i’m serious. i want to understand.
Wild to me that people are still defending Joe Biden. He enabled & funded & armed a genocide. What the fuck. He's not uwu smol bean he was president of the USA.
Starting my day with @ifbookspod.bsky.social letting me know that Politico wants us to be clear: Rahm Emmanuel eats salads just like the rest of us, but harder
I would rather not know anything about these people, but it’s worth pointing out that any time a man does something wrong, people invent a Fatal Attraction scenario in order to make it all the woman’s fault.
Even for a dude as blatantly gross as this, it couldnt possibly be his fault
Hope youre ready, big dog. This was a disgusting comparison to make
Tina Turner was an abused spouse. Biden is a rich white man that funded genocide.
The fact that you put a war criminal on the same level as a beaten women says a LOT about your internal morals.
Fix yourself.
Yes exactly. Hard to be juicier than this! A violent sex scandal connected with America's most notorious criminal and they're like "nah we'll pass, time to run another beat sweetener on Rubio instead." They just like Trump and want to help him. bsky.app/profile/plan...
the actual reason is that the media likes Trump and wants to help him. They didn't like Hillary and they didn't like Biden and wanted to hurt them. That explains why Hillary's emails was covered as a nuclear-level scandal and "Trump is a violent rapist who is best friends with Jeff Epstein" isn't
i hope if nothing else, the media ignoring this finally stops people from saying "the reason the media doesn't run drumbeat scandal coverage on trump the way they did on Clinton is because Dems don't make a big deal of it like Republicans do"
Had a look through this guy's other replies and the reason he's mad isn't actually because the mayor is playing basketball, but because he isn't excited about Israel butchering Palestinian children
I am old enough to remember when politicians felt the need to hide behind euphemism and obfuscation. As frustrating as these obfuscations were I hope it is becoming clear to all that they were an advance, historically speaking
I am old enough to remember when politicians felt the need to hide behind euphemism and obfuscation. As frustrating as these obfuscations were I hope it is becoming clear to all that they were an advance, historically speaking
RFK: "There's five hundred million Arabs in the world. And yet they don't produce science. They don't win the Nobel Prize. They don't win the Fields Prize. They don't win the Wolf Prize. They don't produce literature."
"More than eight Palestinians have been killed in Israeli attacks across the Gaza Strip over the past 48 hours,"
Amateurs. Here's how to do it right:
www.wsj.com/world/middle...
After WW2 people believed that evil had been defeated
But evil is NEVER defeated, every generation must fight its own evil
But people have been convinced by evil that fighting itself is evil
What would have happened if we believed that in WW2?
We'd all worship the swastika.