Jason Poulos

Jason Poulos

@poulos.house

AI and policy researcher. Ran for Congress on a platform of Medicare-for-all, getting big money out of politics, and ending forever wars. https://linktr.ee/jasonpoulos

917 followers741 following1K posts

The now-reviled AI lobby has adopted the spending vehicle laundering strategy that AIPAC perfected.

David Sirota@davidsirota.com

🚨EXCLUSIVE: AIPAC is funneling cash into elections through a secret network of groups that are branded to popular liberal causes - and that have nothing to do with Israel. For the first time, @levernews.com exposes the entire secret scheme👇

AIPAC will "only" have dark money spending through their super PAC UDP as a disciplining tool against members of Congress who violate the quid pro quo.

Jewish Insider@jewishinsider.com

SCOOP | After three cycles of direct political involvement through its political action committee, AIPAC announced it will no longer issue endorsements or directly earmark contributions to candidates. Marc Rod reports: ji.news/5pegt

Is there any doubt that these billionaires' personal policy preferences and vested interests are driving the agenda for the Majority Democrats network? The Mandels have contributed $15.1M into the network's federal committees (54% of the total raised).

Stephen Mandel's hedge fund, Lone Pine Capital, has bet heavily on the AI data center boom, with about half of its disclosed stock portfolio in AI-infra companies. The Mandels' have also long bankrolled the charter school movement.

Majority Democrats, which is profiled in this piece, is funded almost entirely by a single hedge-fund billionaire who is a charter school zealot and heavily invested in hyperscalers and AI data centers. Yet this group is referred to as "center-left."

This post is unavailable.

The draft bill requires LLM developers to submit risk reports, security test results, and safety frameworks to the Dept. of Commerce. However, it creates a statutory exemption shielding all submitted info from FOIA requests.

Marc Andreesen is an intellectual founder of the Abundance movement, having devoted an entire chapter to it in his 2023 screed "The Techno-Optimist Manifesto." His political spending is geared towards installing weak federal frameworks for crypto (like the CLARITY Act) and AI.

One of the more outrageous parts of this story is how Gillibrand abandoned her legislative efforts to revive postal banking (through the Postal Banking Act) in favor of putting a regulatory patina on crypto. The argument that crypto 'democratizes finance' assumes access to digital technology.

Nate Weisberg@nateweisberg.bsky.social

I asked Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand if it bothers her that her staff trades crypto while she works on legislation that benefits the industry. “This is not a nanny state,” she said. Profiled crypto’s favorite Democrat for @nymag.com

"This cycle, the cryptocurrency and AI industries continued shelling out huge sums to target messages to Democratic voters and champion their favorites, much of it supporting centrists and opposing progressives."

David Moore@davidrussellmoore.bsky.social

NEWS: DNC Chair Ken Martin says the DNC will release its plan to rein in corporate and "dark money" spending in the 2028 presidential primary. The plan, expected in the coming months, would set new rules on independent expenditures for Democratic candidates for the White House. With @thenation.com

The amount DSA would receive ($6.6M) from the estate of a socialist NYU prof. would go a long way towards org building. It's a fraction of the amt that pro-data center billionaire Stephen Mandel has donated to Majority Dems ($11M), one of several Abundance Dem groups. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/09/n...

The sole sponsor of this event, MD PAC, is almost entirely funded by hedge-fund founder Stephen Mandel, who gave $11M to MD PAC (73% of the total raised). Mandel is a benefactor of the charter school movement in CT and his Lone Pine Capital is heavily invested in AI infrastructure.

levernews.comHow A Hedge Fund Billionaire Became The Democrats’ New KingmakerStephen Mandel is bankrolling a new political apparatus built to “redefine” the Democratic Party — but what does he actually want?
Matt Corridoni@mattcorridoni.bsky.social

Majority Democrats will see you in Denver! “This isn’t a policy conference…What’s Next is timed for a unique moment after the midterms and before the presidential to debate a vision for the Democratic Party. Politicians who believe they have that vision should be on that stage.”

@repauchincloss.bsky.social claim that his vote for the Massie Amendment to zero out military transfers to Israel was about the US-Israel war on Iran makes no sense. He supported US strikes on Iran as late as Feb. 2026, falsely stating that Iran had no air defenses above 10K ft.

Jason Poulos reposted

Palantir shifting from hiring only "Ivy or Ivy-equivalent" degrees to hiring only out of high school is an admission that "training" and "talent" were never factors at all. They were looking for packaging & prestige, and now they're looking for ignorance & impressionability.

If you're an alignment researcher at Anthropic, you can investigate "model welfare": Does an LLM have consciousness? Does it experience "spiritual bliss"? Does it get sad or distressed? Don't worry about the welfare of the humans who suffer the negative externalities of the AI industry!

In the Claude 4 system card, the word 'welfare' appears 54 times, and only in relation to the well-being to the model. By casting an LLM as a sentient being — rather than an artificial structure of tokens, embeddings, and weights —

nytimes.comReligious Scholars Met With Anthropic. What They Heard Stunned Them. (Gift Article)In a series of private meetings, the company consulted religious scholars to help instill morality into its A.I. models — and make the case that Claude could be conscious.

AI companies are able to assuage themselves of the moral injury of knowing their products are being used by governments to perpetuate mass killings and surveillance.

He falsely claimed the vote was about Iran — he voted for it because he was facing a primary challenge. The day after the primary, he was the only member of the Mass. delegation to vote with Republicans to pull federal aid to universities not sufficiently cooperative with Israel.

thesunchronicle.comAuchincloss declines to discuss Israel during stop in AttleboroCongressman’s office later shares past statements supporting Israel’s defense while criticizing Trump, Netanyahu

The CLARITY Act passed the House in July 2025, with 78 Dems voting Yea. The legislation hands “exclusive jurisdiction” over so-called “digital commodity” spot markets to the CFTC — a smaller regulator with a history of being friendlier to the industries it nominally polices than the SEC.

What does this mean? Chinese AI companies are arguably taking safety more seriously than American companies because they release open-weight models and are more transparent with technical documentation.

Democrats should not be formulating AI regulatory policy or messaging trying to win back tech oligarchs like Marc Andreessen. They are getting what they want from Republicans. We need a single federal AI Authority with the power to block or withdraw any deployment: poulos.house/issues/feder....

As usual, @repauchincloss.bsky.social fails to meet the moment and says nothing of substance. He cannot call for a strong federal AI safety framework or to regulate AI data centers because pro-AI oligarchs like Marc Andreessen fund both his corporate centrist group Majority Democrats

View full thread

In the all-party primary system, super PACs would have a greater opportunity to "buy" a candidate's place in the general election. Super PACs already spend money in single-party primaries, with the amount of spending related to the perceived competitiveness of the primary.

Jason Poulos@poulos.house

Mass. ballot Question 3 is financed by private equity and would provide an electoral advantage to well-financed candidates and those with super PAC backing.

Would the overall amount of super PAC spending increase under an all-party primary system? I'm not sure. We could look at CA or WA but the amount of super PAC spending would've increased over time in both places regardless.

As usual, @repauchincloss.bsky.social fails to meet the moment and says nothing of substance. He cannot call for a strong federal AI safety framework or to regulate AI data centers because pro-AI oligarchs like Marc Andreessen fund both his corporate centrist group Majority Democrats

He gave a ChatGPT-generated speech on the floor of the House not to call attention to safety risks of AI, but to promote legislation that would've directed $10 million annually to establish a U.S.–Israel Artificial Intelligence Center.

The objective of AI companies is to maximize (future) shareholder value. The CEOs don't care about safety or the future of humanity. More skepticism from electeds, the media, and the public is warranted.

What’s been lost in all the stentorian pronouncements byfrontier developers like Anthropic and OpenAI about AI destroying humanity is that it’s intheir financial interest to slow down. prospect.org?p=144760

Mass. ballot Question 3 is financed by private equity and would provide an electoral advantage to well-financed candidates and those with super PAC backing.

In 4 of the 5 contested congressional races in the Sept 1 primaries (incl. MA-4), the Democratic challenger would have advanced to the general, all else equal, because we received more votes than the Republican nominee (if any).

People tend to think of party competition in terms of inter-party rather than intra-party competition. In MA-4, the policy differences between my campaign and the corporate centrist incumbent were greater than those between the incumbent and Republican nominee.

"A spokesperson for US Representative Jake Auchincloss, too, referred to his primary opponent Jason Poulos, an AI researcher, as a 'DSA opponent.' Poulos is indeed a DSA member but wasn’t backed by the organization and saw that description as a 'fund-raising appeal.'"

bostonglobe.comFrom AOC to Mamdani, democratic socialists are so hot right now — except in Massachusetts - The Boston GlobeThe Boston DSA chapter — which at 3,100 members is the country’s fifth-largest chapter — endorsed just one candidate for office this primary cycle in Evan MacKay, who lost their state legislative bid.

Mass. taxpayers pitched in up to $72 million for building Gillette stadium in 2002 and the Kraft Group is currently refusing to pay Foxboro an invoiced $953,640 to renew the stadium's entertainment license.

Prem Thakker ツ@premthakker.bsky.social

New: Macklemore says Robert Kraft — who owns Gillette Stadium, where Macklemore & Ed Sheeran were to perform later this month — called Sheeran. Kraft rallied other owners together behind an ultimatum for Sheeran: if Macklemore stays on the tour, you won't be allowed in our venues.

"The shifting politics of crypto on the left poses a major dilemma for the Senate Democrats weighing whether to vote for the Clarity Act, the sweeping bill that would create a bespoke new regulatory framework for digital assets."

Much of our national politics can be viewed as electeds making fundraising appeals to a handful of billionaires. Voters of both parties want more AI regulation, so this statement can be seen as a signal to the pro-AI Leading the Future super PAC for them to help Republicans in the midterms.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

Mike Johnson punts on oversight of AI companies: "Congress is obviously less qualified than the people who are pushing this frontier to know the ins and outs of it"

Johnson "argued Congress has already instituted AI guardrails." What guardrails? The Speaker's deference to AI companies to regulate themselves is a pitch for AI super PACs like Leading the Future to assist Republicans in the midterms.

politico.comTech companies must be primarily responsible for AI safety, Mike Johnson says“There is an obvious corporate responsibility that the people who are creating these models have to have to ensure that their products are safe," the House speaker said Sunday.

Last year, Alphabet (Google) dropped its 2018 pledge to not use AI for developing weapons and surveillance tools, ostensibly so it could compete with Microsoft and Amazon for military and intelligence contracts.