Nicholas Creel

Nicholas Creel

@prof-peacock.bsky.social

Associate Professor of Business Law and the Director of the Center for Innovation & Entrepreneurship at Georgia College & State University. Also frequent contributor at Newsweek: https://www.newsweek.com/authors/nicholas-creel All opinions my own

363 followers150 following1.1K posts

Anyone with this take has to be the most miserable kind of person to work with to the point that I’m 100% certain to bring an iced coffee into any interview I ever might do again just to make sure I can avoid getting stuck with them

Kai Ryssdal@kairyssdal.bsky.social

I’m sorry, but if you bring an iced coffee - or any damn beverage at all - to a job interview, you’re disqualified. It’s not hard, people.

The only thing I‘ve learned from the “Is it professional to drink an iced coffee at an interview” debate is how much I’d hate to work with people who focus on such stupid shit.

Elect a giant piece of shit, toilet paper gets more expensive. Supply and demand. That’s Econ 101, folks.

Paul Waldman@paulwaldman.bsky.social

This will be enormously popular with the voting public, excellent work sir, your political instincts are unmatched www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...

I’ve got another piece out at @thehill.com over the Paramount WB merger. I make the case that consumer viewing habits and the entertainment industry’s adaptation to streaming have caused the harm state attorneys general claim the merger would bring about: thehill.com/opinion/6026...

thehill.comConsumers want to watch movies at Home. No lawsuit will change that.An associate professor of business law argues that the decline of theatrical exhibition is driven by poor industry practices and consumer preference for streaming rather than the potential Paramoun…

Guess the bullshit Fauci hearing distracted enough MAGA folks for them to drop the bullshit reflecting pool charges they were using to try to distract from the bullshit reasons Trump started a war he can’t win or exit from. www.wsj.com/us-news/law/...

wsj.comProsecutors Drop Case Against Olympic Canoeist Charged With Vandalizing Reflecting PoolThe U.S. Attorney’s Office in D.C. said new information showed the damage was the result of a botched installation and not vandalism.

“Subject to Iran opening the Strait of Hormuz“. What indication do we have that Iran agreed to this? None. What’s more, their incentive is to keep it closed, as the economic disruption builds the longer it is shut down. Trump is 100% caving to Iran here

Financial Times@financialtimes.com

Breaking news: Donald Trump has said he will 'suspend the bombing and attack of Iran for a period of two weeks' subject to Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz. ft.trib.al/kXXZsOc

Trump is clearly not being literal with his statement to end a civilization, facially absurd rhetoric is a hallmark of his communication style. Still, by putting that out there, particularly in a time of war, he corrodes the moral and legal foundations of the international order.

Nicholas Creel reposted

The international legal order was for many years like oxygen: no one thought to put a price on it until the room started running out of it. Nicholas Creel (@prof-peacock.bsky.social‬) examines what the cost of a lawless world is already looking like in practice:

worldpoliticsreview.comThe High Cost of a Lawless WorldThe international legal order was for many years like oxygen: No one thought to put a price on it—until the room started running out of it.

Surprisingly, Trump has actually *increased* support for birthright citizenship. He helped polarize the pubic on an issue that was fairly evenly divided and a substantial majority now support it, at the highest rates to date no less.

Kevin M. Levin@civilwarmemory.bsky.social

Even if the Supreme Court rules to uphold Birthright Citizenship, and I suspect it will, Trump will still have succeeded in politicizing an issue that has largely gone unquestioned by most Americans. To that extent he will have weakened--perhaps permanently--another pillar of our democracy.

And Trump has ‘’postponed’’ his threatened attacks. Like we all knew he would. #TACO

Nicholas Creel@prof-peacock.bsky.social

Trump threatened to destroy Iranian power plants if the Strait of Hormuz isn't opened in 48 hours. Iran's parliament speaker responded by threatening to "irreversibly destroy" energy facilities across the entire region. This is a game of chicken, BUT not a symmetric one. That matters! 1/

Trump threatened to destroy Iranian power plants if the Strait of Hormuz isn't opened in 48 hours. Iran's parliament speaker responded by threatening to "irreversibly destroy" energy facilities across the entire region. This is a game of chicken, BUT not a symmetric one. That matters! 1/

View full thread

Finally, the is the credible commitment angle. Iran has publicly burned its bridges. Ghalibaf's latest statement to go scorched earth is on the record, tied to national honor & regime legitimacy. Trump has the TACO reputation. His steering wheel is visibly still attached. Everyone knows it. 8/

Iran has a dominant strategy of going straight, existential stakes, & a credible commitment. Trump has no dominant strategy, nonexistential stakes, & a documented history of swerving. The game theoretic prediction is clear. Watch for the Trump swerve. The only question is how he packages it. #TACO

Trump threatened to destroy Iranian power plants if the Strait of Hormuz isn't opened in 48 hours. Iran's parliament speaker responded by threatening to "irreversibly destroy" energy facilities across the entire region. This is a game of chicken, BUT not a symmetric one. That matters! 1/

View full thread

Trump's swerve incentive is also very strong. Following through means Iran retaliates against ALL regional energy infrastructure simultaneously. They already threatened it. Oil goes to $175-200+ overnight. That's not a political problem. That's a global recession & a midterm election disaster. 6/

There's also a resolve asymmetry. Iran is playing for regime survival…existential stakes. Trump is playing for domestic political positioning. In an asymmetric conflict the side with existential stakes outlasts the side without them. 7/

Trump threatened to destroy Iranian power plants if the Strait of Hormuz isn't opened in 48 hours. Iran's parliament speaker responded by threatening to "irreversibly destroy" energy facilities across the entire region. This is a game of chicken, BUT not a symmetric one. That matters! 1/

View full thread

Iran's payoff for NOT swerving: it maintains leverage, continues inflicting economic pain (its primary deterrent against future attacks), consolidates domestic support, preserves optionality. Their dominant strategy is to go straight regardless of what Trump does. 4/

When one player has a dominant strategy of going straight no matter what, the game changes entirely. The other player's rational response is to swerve, because going straight into a player who will never swerve isn't chicken, it’s suicide. 5/

Trump threatened to destroy Iranian power plants if the Strait of Hormuz isn't opened in 48 hours. Iran's parliament speaker responded by threatening to "irreversibly destroy" energy facilities across the entire region. This is a game of chicken, BUT not a symmetric one. That matters! 1/

In a standard game of chicken, both players prefer ‘’swerve’’ to a crash. The player who credibly commits to going straight wins because the other rationally swerves. The problem here is Iran's payoff for swerving is likely negative, not just less good. That is huge in terms of expectations 2/

Opening the Strait means Iran loses its only remaining leverage, signals that American military pressure works, invites future threats to the regime, & gets nothing guaranteed in return. For a regime fighting for survival, swerving doesn't just mean losing the game. It means losing everything. 3/

Democrats must demand an impartial 3rd party to oversee the release of all Epstein files. It is time we stop allowing the President to protect pedofiles. #EpsteinFiles #EpsteinCoverup #Epstein #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #EpsteinClientList

newsweek.comDemocrats must not fund Trump’s Epstein cover-up | OpinionDemocrats need to leverage government funding talks to get an appointment of a special master on the Epstein case.

I think the lesson here is pretty clear…Most people are stupid and/or terrible

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

January 6 was like a much dumber version of Hitler’s Beer Hall Putsch and yet a plurality of American voters were like, Yeah, let’s give that guy the nuke codes again. An absolutely world historical debacle of societal ignorance. I’ll never understand it.