Jane Green

Jane Green

@profjanegreen.bsky.social

Nuffield College, Oxford Director, Nuffield Politics Research Centre President, British Polling Council Election Analyst, ITV News Voting, surveys, explanation, singing …

9.7K followers510 following1K posts

Jane Green reposted

NEW: How robust is opinion change on Brexit/Brexit @persuasionuk.bsky.social research properly stress tested it. We find a fair bit of softness. We think headline Rejoin support is more like 52 v 48% (!) rather than ~64-36% you see in polls. Not fatal for Rejoin but worth paying attention to🧵

Absolutely appalling from a recently (and arguably currently) mainstream politician. Just look to the US to see how fast norms can erode and how dangerous that is!

Sunder Katwala (sundersays)@sundersays.bsky.social

Robert Jenrick for Reform says that Royal Marines using "lethal force" on small boats could end it in days. "Deploy the Royal Marines into the Channel. If they need to use lethal force then they'll be able to do so. I think the problem would come to an end within a matter of days."

Jane Green reposted

Earlier this year, E3G released a big report with the Department of War Studies at Kings College which showed that our dependence on gas is a major national security risk. Cutting heat pumps to fund defence is like not paying for a flu jab so you can buy lemsip. It makes no sense.

In this work, we find - in two key ways - that people do not see the Conservatives as the main opposition. Parties' importance in the media and their prominence seems to be far more a function of their polling than their seats in parliament, as the Lib Dems have known for a long time.

Jane Green@profjanegreen.bsky.social

NEW! Mega thread on the Tories... Work from the NPRC team @nuffieldcollege.bsky.social shows two critical electoral evaluations that spell much deeper trouble for the Tories. Follow @justinrobinsonpol.bsky.social and @martamiori.bsky.social as this work builds. Why do the findings matter? …

On the one hand, that's journalism keeping up with public preferences. On the other, its self-fulfilling and also very simplistic. But it would be interesting to know WHY people look at Reform as the primary opposition on the right atm. Even Labour needs the Conservatives to be more viable.

Thwarted again today with the simple task of setting up my Mum’s care home payments. Online = computer says no. That took months. In person = totally inconsistent information. Today, need special ID…never before. You’d think Nationwide could do this.

It’s mad that we’re all saying, ‘look! A job!’ However, look! A job! There are many amazing people on the job market. Good luck…

Daniel Devine@danjdevine.bsky.social

❗ There's a permanent, research and teaching lectureship over at the University of Surrey in the broad area of behaviour, attitudes, parties, etc. jobs.surrey.ac.uk/Vacancy.aspx...

Turnout might be the more important insight from this by-election,with the caveat that yesterday was a London seat. But has been higher where the fights are high stakes elections between two blocs - left versus Reform. One to watch …

Election Maps UK@electionmaps.uk

Turnout in Holborn & St Pancras is 38.8% Low compared to recent Parliamentary By-Elections, but fairly solid historically speaking (above the ⅔ of General Election turnout threshold). GE2024: 54.1%

If you want to consider the counterfactual outcome for the Greens, just look at their recent decline in opinion polls. It would always have been tough for them in H & St Pancras, but it was plausible and it would have been a huge boost.

Jane Green@profjanegreen.bsky.social

Holborn and St Pancras: 1. Yes, good for Labour. But not a usual 'mid-term' moment but a honeymoon. Will it last? 2. Greens could have won, Polanski could be an MP. They have done themselves real harm. 3. Doesn't show Burnham's *strategy* working - uniting the left. Other seats much better tests.

Holborn and St Pancras: 1. Yes, good for Labour. But not a usual 'mid-term' moment but a honeymoon. Will it last? 2. Greens could have won, Polanski could be an MP. They have done themselves real harm. 3. Doesn't show Burnham's *strategy* working - uniting the left. Other seats much better tests.

View full thread

The battle isn’t just for popularity but for *relevance* and *viability*. The Tories need to mount a credible alternative platform on the economy and need signals that they can win elections somewhere – anywhere – once more. Their problems are, then, even worse than they first appear.

View full thread

Graph 2: Among the right, Reform UK have replaced the Conservatives as the viable local party on the right (Research by Dr Marta Miori and Jane Green, Nuffield College)

View full thread

Using new @yougov.co.uk data, and comparable samples in England and Wales with the BES in 2024, we can see that Reform are now seen as more viable locally on the right. Voters are also more uncertain, making the battle for viability a critical contest. See the proportions change ...

View full thread
View full thread

The first chart shows the association between negative economic evaluations (things have got worse in last 12 months) and support for the three parties, w/ BES data. The line for Reform post-2024 should be a dark blue line if the Tories are seen by voters as relevant. Reform are benefiting instead.

1. Conservatives need to mount a much more serious challenge as an alternative government 2. They shouldn’t be assuming that Badenoch’s personal ratings are some magic bullet. 3. They are not winning anywhere, and that message is getting through to voters. This should be a wakeup call…

Jane Green reposted

Jane Green reposted

We're going to get a lot of this. And we should take the numbers with an enormous dollop of salt. The negotiations would be tough, the terms less favourable than those we rejected in 2016. These numbers will move ' however 'mega' the poll! www.theguardian.com/world/2026/o...

theguardian.comHalf of UK wants to rejoin EU and backing it could drive up Labour vote, megapoll findsExclusive: Findings will bolster those in No 10 who want to negotiate on re-entry but some senior figures remain wary

Jane Green reposted

I think this would ultimately be good for Farage/Reform, who would presumably be viewed as stronger on ‘no going back’ than the Tories and who would be buoyed by riling against the ‘anti-democratic establishment’. Albeit on an angry, vocal minority.

Jane Green@profjanegreen.bsky.social

We (BES colleagues) have just finished a book showing how Brexit crystallised the realignment of the electorate, and how its persistence beyond 2024 depends on whether the parties appeal to the same groups … Seems that’s a ‘yes’ then!

We (BES colleagues) have just finished a book showing how Brexit crystallised the realignment of the electorate, and how its persistence beyond 2024 depends on whether the parties appeal to the same groups … Seems that’s a ‘yes’ then!

Roland Smith@rolandmcs.bsky.social

It's possible the next general election has just become another referendum on the EU.

Sharon Graham said removing the triple lock is morally wrong in the context that the better option is going after billionaires. Frankly, all cuts could be framed as morally wrong given that starting assumption if you prefer billionaire wealth taxes. If we DON'T assume that, what is morally right?!

Alex Andreou@sturdyalex.bsky.social

Joe Pike: "I'm here with the only person anyone wants to speak to, Sharon Graham." <Graham bellyaches at length about triple lock> Joe Pike: "So, this gives you a flavour of the debate here." NO IT DOESN'T! You literally only spoke to one person, sought out explicitly because she disagreed. 😂

From the speculation so far Burnham is going to go big politically and set some cats amongst pigeons today. Interesting challenge for the lobby who specialise in politics way more than they do policy.

View full thread

More housebuilding? Big challenge to sell the growth story and the ‘prices should be cheaper’ story because no-one with an expensive asset wants asset depreciation.

Cheaper energy in 10 years with the grid? Long-term politics is essential but it is hard to swallow while prices climb every day. I hope he will say something - anything - about the price of fuel, even if it’s just acknowledging.

From the speculation so far Burnham is going to go big politically and set some cats amongst pigeons today. Interesting challenge for the lobby who specialise in politics way more than they do policy.

For example, is the triple lock really so untouchable, electorally? Older voters aren’t only concerned for their incomes! The risks of social care are very real too, as are the worries for younger generations.

Jane Green reposted

Jane Green reposted

New opinion piece with @profjanegreen.bsky.social in @financialtimes.com ⬇️📊 We argue that five parties in the polls doesn't mean five-way races. What's really going on is a scramble within each bloc over who can win, fought out seat by seat.

Its so important people distinguish between: a) Trump's politics are popular; and b) Trump is in office because of institutional capture and capitulation The right in Britain really needs to understand how unpopular he is, and how particular the institutional story is.

G Elliott Morris@gelliottmorris.com

No president has ever gone into a midterm election as unpopular as Trump is today. Not even George W. Bush in 2006. Trump's net approval is twice as low as it was at this point in 2018. blog.fiftyplusone.news/p/no-preside...

Incredibly clear from @alfie-stirling.bsky.social here on BBC, who we are delighted to be working with @nuffieldcollege.bsky.social.

Joseph Rowntree Foundation@jrf-uk.bsky.social

'More fundamentally, it begs the question: what sort of country do we want to live in?' 📺 Director of Policy @alfie-stirling.bsky.social was on @bbc-politics.bsky.social Live today, commenting on what the impact of Conservative proposals to cut Universal Credit would mean for those on low incomes 🔽

Here's the seats to votes ratios for 2024! In a paper by @martamiori.bsky.social and me:

Jane Green@profjanegreen.bsky.social

While its true that the Lib Dems got a whopping seats to vote share in 2024 and could do again on static polling, it is genuinely intriguing that they're not doing better nationally given the Conservatives are chasing Reform voters. Where are the more affluent voters going, and why?

While its true that the Lib Dems got a whopping seats to vote share in 2024 and could do again on static polling, it is genuinely intriguing that they're not doing better nationally given the Conservatives are chasing Reform voters. Where are the more affluent voters going, and why?

I feel like Westminster got hooked on the adrenaline of constant instability.

Sunder Katwala (sundersays)@sundersays.bsky.social

Matthew Goodwin - who appears to have an almost unparalleled record of bad + wrong political predictions - is musing about a November 19th 2026 general election in his latest podcast/email.

Thanks, all, for the solidarity, but also sorry so many people relate to this. Hmm. It really sucks. This whole sandwich generation thing should be called something less benign-sounding, for sure….

Jane Green@profjanegreen.bsky.social

I am trying to bank for my mother and sort all her affairs as her Attorney and can you all just give me the pleasure of briefly screaming into the void please.... .... Thank you. Nothing works. Worse. It works negatively. Rant over.

I am trying to bank for my mother and sort all her affairs as her Attorney and can you all just give me the pleasure of briefly screaming into the void please.... .... Thank you. Nothing works. Worse. It works negatively. Rant over.