R. D. Kent πŸ‰

R. D. Kent πŸ‰

@rdk96.bsky.social

Research fellow at the University of St Andrews. Working on scientism, aesthetic ideology, and the historiography of scientific crises.

1.8K followers348 following97 posts

Philosophy departments are almost always massively overrepresented on these letters, I wonder why

roterote aka Hunter CG@roterote.bsky.social

There are dozens of academics signing this open letter to defend the American Eugenicist Nathan Cofnas from the consequences of his own actions. They are calling him a β€œwhistleblower”

By which I mean letters defending the expressive freedom of actors on the right, specifically. I don't recall seeing a similar letter with similar representation in response to Cambridge's attempt to shut down Neil Wyn Evans, for instance

R. D. Kent πŸ‰ reposted

Basic contention is academia used to be about inquiry, and not just a finishing school for elites as it is nowadays. But my impression is academia has always been to a large extent a finishing school for elites and by historical standards there's an unusually high emphasis on intellectual merit now?

R. D. Kent πŸ‰ reposted

I mean, I begin with analysis of the commodity, but to each their own.

Mark Chadbourn@chadbourn.bsky.social

β€œYou see, Marxism, communism, and socialism begin with the premise that there is no God. And there's a whole different set of implications that follow that. 2/

R. D. Kent πŸ‰ reposted

Jesus. 35 UK universities quietly- without debate - joined the Ministry of Defence’s β€œBattlefield Alliance” which seeks to β€œreorientate academia towards Defence and National Security” They’re destroying the social sciences and humanities while militarising the institutions

It's strange returning to research as a postdoc after 15 months of just teaching work. I get to go to the office each morning to read/write philosophy (joy!), like I did when I was a PhD student--the crucial difference is that I am now on an above-minimim-wage salary and have an office of my own

It's remarkable how much this affects productivity and peace of mind. If universities want more PhD students to pass in good time, publish regularly, and get along without existential difficulties, I can't see anything higher priority than paying them properly

Ofc, set alongside the mounting issues with student loans, departmental closures, and forced redundancies, it's pretty clear to anyone observing that the entire UK HE sector needs a complete overhaul to resemble anything close to a rational system

Excited to share that I'll be joining the University of St Andrews as a Research Fellow from July πŸ₯³ 🏴󠁧󠁒󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 I'll be contributing my work on ideological scientism to @alicemurphs.bsky.social's excellent aesthetics of science project, which you can read more about here:

st-andrews.ac.ukAesthetic Values and the Social Dimensions of Science | ArcheAesthetic Values and the Social Dimensions of Science – Arche

R. D. Kent πŸ‰ reposted

Students who say β€œMills” finally vindicated!

Jo Wolff@jowolff.bsky.social

Brilliant! I’d suspected that stylistic analysis would show up something interesting as On Liberty is written so differently to Utilitarianism. I’m sure many people have thought the same. But I didn’t have the skills to attempt it myself. Delighted it has been done.

R. D. Kent πŸ‰ reposted

I'm genuinely super excited to announce that I'm moving to Gent as a postdoctoral researcher in April, working on the philosophy of sustainable chemistry

R. D. Kent πŸ‰ reposted

Genuinely just bonkers to watch the USA do this to one of the most successful and innovative hubs of scientific research the world has ever seen. All those years of Free Speech On Campus debates and it turns out they actually wanted less cancer research. Absurd.

Jeremy Berg@jeremymberg.bsky.social

NSF Update through March 13, 2026 1/2

"Occupational skill is not identical with class position. Some engineers are hired men; other engineers do the hiring. A consultant engineer may have his own office, work for his own account, and, economically speaking, be an independent enterpriser. Or an individual with the same type and amount...

View full thread

Uncritical acceptance of social-epistemological categories shouldn't fly in political philosophy of science. The undifferentiated "scientist" as technical expert might be good enough for epistemologists, but separating economic positions among scientists is necessary for political analysis

"Occupational skill is not identical with class position. Some engineers are hired men; other engineers do the hiring. A consultant engineer may have his own office, work for his own account, and, economically speaking, be an independent enterpriser. Or an individual with the same type and amount...

of trained skill may be a production engineer with a fixed salary and fixed stages in his career within an organization. The possession of a skill may well mean quite heterogeneous interests, class positions, and political loyalties. In a democracy, apart from common technical knowledge, ...

technicians may be found on all political sides of many social fences. The technical knowledge of managers ... is one thing; their class position, political loyalties, and their stake in the current system is quite another. There is no intrinsic connection between the two."

For anyone attending MANCEPT 2025 this week, I'll be delivering my talk on ideological scientism at 16:30 today, as part of the "Integrating Politics and Philosophy of Science from Below" workshop. You can also hear grumble at length about the "Science & Values" paradigm :)

R. D. Kent πŸ‰ reposted

helen de cruz was fully who she was. her genuineness & humaneness was abundant in everything she did, including in dying, something we will all do, but few of us as honestly. in that she exemplified what you would hope a philosopher could be. i’m glad to have known her a little.