Pinned
Running Dog
Running Dog
@runningdog.bsky.social
In the early days of our movement, it was mandatory that all members smoke cigarettes and refrain from speaking, but we realized those traditions were stupid. He/him/his/bark
1K followers254 following3.3K posts
Ministers keep saying things like “get ready for war in 1,000 days” and journalists keep not saying things like “what do you mean” and “can you be more specific” www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home...
Running Dog reposted
Could we simply avoid the part where we’re asked to pretend the prime minister would have to rely on his private stash of baked beans in the event of a crisis www.theguardian.com/society/2026...
Could McSweeney have used his powers to delete GB News or any of the other channels that were routinely accusing his boss of treason, or were his talents somehow much more specific than that
Journalists openly gloating at a secret wrecking campaign to put this website out of business, orchestrated in secret between party officials and media outlets. And the wild part is, theres no need to brag and show off. They’ve won, they got what they wanted. But they can’t help themselves.
Running Dog reposted
Getting a bit over your skis here lads. Is anybody seriously going to say that “thanks for doing Brexit 10 years ago here’s £5m” is some kind of contractual payment www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Love how 50% of political commentary is telling the audience how smart & well-informed they are, and the other 50% is relentlessly repeating the same handful of political quotes and concepts to them again and again as if to a small child
It might save time if the Sensible Moderates put their heads together and gave us a list of things that *aren’t* ancient Soviet plots and who *isn’t* engaged in a secret conspiracy against Britain
You’d think at some point in business school there’d by a hypothetical like “somebody offers you software that they promise will revolutionise your business but they will not tell you how to implement it. Is reorganising your business to depend on this software a good idea Y/N”, but apparently not
I mean it’s good to see a bit of contrition, but “we gave our employees some software with no clear application which I assumed was magic and ordered them to use it for everything” needs a “so I have no choice but to resign” at the end. www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
There was a time when the news line from these interviews would pivot on “hang on, what do you mean ‘genocide’?” Now it’s yeah yeah but who are you calling racist
Not Laura Kuenssberg promoting the idea that local councillors are helplessly watching BBC 1 on a Sunday morning for guidance rather than... actually just democratically elected local leaders very capable of making their own decisions.
I mean it’s good to see a bit of contrition, but “we gave our employees some software with no clear application which I assumed was magic and ordered them to use it for everything” needs a “so I have no choice but to resign” at the end. www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
I mean it’s good to see a bit of contrition, but “we gave our employees some software with no clear application which I assumed was magic and ordered them to use it for everything” needs a “so I have no choice but to resign” at the end. www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
Steve Richards frequently makes the point that media & politicians constantly talking about war makes war more likely, and it’d just be interesting to know whether any of the lads who are currently in 24/7 war mode have thought about that.
Idk man, half the adult fighting age population is like 15 million people. If the army needs more than that somebody’s really fucked up
This must be the easiest job in UK journalism, simply noticing absurd situations that the rest of the media is obliged to pretend are fine and normal
A Sky News show in which Labour peer and broadcaster Ayesha Hazarika interviewed Labour Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has attracted criticism 🗣️ 'This is so utterly absurd. We so badly need media reform'
Hypothetically if a UK ally were operating “annihilation zones” in its occupied territories, would “what does the Green Party think about it” be the most pressing issue in national politics www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
The issue here is that hacks found it useful to agree that Reform had detoxified simply by not letting Tommy Robinson in and doing well in the polls, so evidence of all the toxicity that never went away is very inconvenient and pretend-shocking.
I mean it’s not a vetting problem, is it? It’s that it’s a racist party, run by racists, with racist policies, for the benefit of racists. The fact that it turns out to be full of racists is not a glitch
Worked at a Ladbrokes for about 5 days, 20 years ago. My manager was being investigated for unspecified activities, which meant I was left unsupervised and mostly untrained while he was questioned in a back room. He’d occasionally offer me life advice like “don’t trust anybody in this game, boy” 🧐
Strikes me that when the hacks all went to Reform conferences and declared it very professional and detoxified, either the UK’s largest grouping of pub uncles somehow maintained best behaviour for a whole weekend, or the UK’s finest political journalists just weren’t very observant
“We're not f****** stupid enough to p*** off the entire woke south or centrist south really of the country,” “You need to seem palatable to everyone...We just need to get f****** elected, that’s all that really matters. We won't necessarily say what we are doing, part of the point is to not [say].”
Good work by Rooney - and Faber - for sticking with it to create this absurd situation www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...
Running Dog reposted
At first I thought something weird was going on but then I realised No, it’s simply planes based in Oxfordshire going off to fight a war that the UK is not involved in, so I went back to sleep www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
Okay so he meant to say Iran *cannot* nuke LA but said “could” instead, and everyone including the crowd assumed he meant “might as well”. Like literally what are we supposed to make of this incident www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
Or sometimes as anyone with GB News relatives will know, you disagree about both facts and values, at which point it’s impossible to talk about politics at all so you learn nothing and just gradually (or rapidly!) stop talking.
The best cure for ideological bias is find someone on the other side and go to lunch with them. Sometimes we disagree about facts. Sometimes we disagree about values. Figuring out which is which is fun part. https://newsletter.platypuseconomics.com/p/my-libertarian-friends-were-right
Running Dog reposted
The reason I'm so skeptical of the AI industry's latest breakthroughs is they are operating with infinite money and pretending that doesn't matter. So many things become easier when you have infinite money to throw at a problem. The Infinite Money Trick davekarpf.beehiiv.com/p/the-infini...