Running Dog

Running Dog

@runningdog.bsky.social

In the early days of our movement, it was mandatory that all members smoke cigarettes and refrain from speaking, but we realized those traditions were stupid. He/him/his/bark

1K followers254 following3.3K posts

Pinned

Journalists: anonymous abuse of politicians has toxified the public sphere, its an existential threat to our democracy 🥺 Also journalists: somebody’s called this MP a knobhead and I won’t say who 🤠

flyingrodent@flyingrodent.bsky.social

Thank god the Adults are Back in Charge

Idk man, when I hear “Get ready for war in 1,000 days” alongside slogans such as “invest in Britain”, I’d want details such as “will my investments and staff be blown up by weapons up to and including nukes ”, and I’m not even a high rolling wealth creator

Running Dog reposted

Convening a focus group of 30 people who have no idea what's going on and no expertise on basically any topic and just turning them loose. "Fuck me up," I tell them. "Just give me all the dumbest stuff you've got."

Steve Richards has done a podcast episode about how difficult it’d be for Ukraine to win the war, so inevitably he’s had to do a follow-up responding to listener emails accusing him of falling for Kremlin propaganda

On Political Thinking, Nick is wowed by the AI minister’s mastery of “low level HTML”, a technology he assumes his listeners have never heard of.

Is it good that senior political journalists are so ignorant of technology that they assume having fucked around with Wordpress in 2006 makes somebody a computer genius? I’d have to say it’s not ideal

In conclusion, the prime minister is a land of contrasts

The News Agents@thenewsagents.co.uk

"The stakes could not be higher for Netanyahu. "Either he goes down as a great figure of Israeli politics, or as this crook who ends up behind bars." Next week’s Israeli elections could see Netanyahu lose more than just his premiership.

Could McSweeney have used his powers to delete GB News or any of the other channels that were routinely accusing his boss of treason, or were his talents somehow much more specific than that

flyingrodent@flyingrodent.bsky.social

Journalists openly gloating at a secret wrecking campaign to put this website out of business, orchestrated in secret between party officials and media outlets. And the wild part is, theres no need to brag and show off. They’ve won, they got what they wanted. But they can’t help themselves.

I didn’t read the canary or watch GB News but I noticed the hacks’ response to the latter was “this literally cannot exist due to Ofcom” then “welp I guess this is happening”, then “might go on there sometimes for beer money”, while the response to the former was “this must be destroyed.”

Hard to know what to make of it. Do hacks simply hate the idea of some guy with a website doing political content? Two decades of Guido would imply that no, they actually love it.

A lot of guys have left the BBC convinced people were watching because of their unique, incredible genius & charisma, but this could be the best one yet 🤞

Running Dog reposted

Imagine buying so much Amol Rajan merch that paying £299 a year for a 30% discount makes financial sense

Daniel McElroy@danielmcelroy0.bsky.social

Amol Rajan’s membership tiers…that is scandalous.

Love how 50% of political commentary is telling the audience how smart & well-informed they are, and the other 50% is relentlessly repeating the same handful of political quotes and concepts to them again and again as if to a small child

flyingrodent@flyingrodent.bsky.social

It might save time if the Sensible Moderates put their heads together and gave us a list of things that *aren’t* ancient Soviet plots and who *isn’t* engaged in a secret conspiracy against Britain

You’d think at some point in business school there’d by a hypothetical like “somebody offers you software that they promise will revolutionise your business but they will not tell you how to implement it. Is reorganising your business to depend on this software a good idea Y/N”, but apparently not

Running Dog@runningdog.bsky.social

I mean it’s good to see a bit of contrition, but “we gave our employees some software with no clear application which I assumed was magic and ordered them to use it for everything” needs a “so I have no choice but to resign” at the end. www.theguardian.com/technology/2...

Of course the X factor here is the guy selling you the mysterious software explains that you alone have the genius to bend it to your will and make a trillion dollars without needing any annoying staff anymore, which I guess is more of a psychology case study than a business school one.

There was a time when the news line from these interviews would pivot on “hang on, what do you mean ‘genocide’?” Now it’s yeah yeah but who are you calling racist

Bold Politics@boldpolitics.bsky.social

Not Laura Kuenssberg promoting the idea that local councillors are helplessly watching BBC 1 on a Sunday morning for guidance rather than... actually just democratically elected local leaders very capable of making their own decisions.

75,000 murders sounds like a big number, but okay if we’re accepting that without question then sure let’s move on to the finer points of international law and philosophy

View full thread

My company had an audit recently where we looked at AI usage in an area I’m pretty familiar with. Turns out 3 teams had separate GPTs designed to do the same thing, all of which were producing pure junk. Some of them assured me their GPTs were doing literally impossible things. It’s amazing

Like there’s a lot of analogies about AI being the next Industrial Revolution but that would only really work if the first guys to receive a power loom had spent a year asking it for legal advice and sex tips

Microsoft, which at least on some level knows that consumer software is *supposed to do a thing*, getting eaten from the inside by the Outsource Your Brain software. I mean it’s remarkable, really.

Steve Richards frequently makes the point that media & politicians constantly talking about war makes war more likely, and it’d just be interesting to know whether any of the lads who are currently in 24/7 war mode have thought about that.

Running Dog@runningdog.bsky.social

Idk man, half the adult fighting age population is like 15 million people. If the army needs more than that somebody’s really fucked up

Like in other contexts you’d assume hacks quoting spooks & army officials saying “OMG I hope Russia doesn’t attack, we’re so defenceless right now, our civilisation is so weak & none of our military alliances are real” was some kind of double bluff, and yet

This must be the easiest job in UK journalism, simply noticing absurd situations that the rest of the media is obliged to pretend are fine and normal

The National@scotnational.bsky.social

A Sky News show in which Labour peer and broadcaster Ayesha Hazarika interviewed Labour Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has attracted criticism 🗣️ 'This is so utterly absurd. We so badly need media reform'

The issue here is that hacks found it useful to agree that Reform had detoxified simply by not letting Tommy Robinson in and doing well in the polls, so evidence of all the toxicity that never went away is very inconvenient and pretend-shocking.

Alasdair Mackenzie@alasdairmackenzie.bsky.social

I mean it’s not a vetting problem, is it? It’s that it’s a racist party, run by racists, with racist policies, for the benefit of racists. The fact that it turns out to be full of racists is not a glitch

Very funny how every episode of Goalhanger’s The Rest is Entertainment, hosted by the UK’s uh savviest culture vultures, has ads for “Bear Hunt”, Goalhanger’s first and stupidest venture into drama.

Worked at a Ladbrokes for about 5 days, 20 years ago. My manager was being investigated for unspecified activities, which meant I was left unsupervised and mostly untrained while he was questioned in a back room. He’d occasionally offer me life advice like “don’t trust anybody in this game, boy” 🧐

This post is unavailable.

Strikes me that when the hacks all went to Reform conferences and declared it very professional and detoxified, either the UK’s largest grouping of pub uncles somehow maintained best behaviour for a whole weekend, or the UK’s finest political journalists just weren’t very observant

Tim Bale@timbale.bsky.social

“We're not f****** stupid enough to p*** off the entire woke south or centrist south really of the country,” “You need to seem palatable to everyone...We just need to get f****** elected, that’s all that really matters. We won't necessarily say what we are doing, part of the point is to not [say].”

Running Dog reposted

The thing is, the press really will get rid of Polanski eventually, just by all screaming in unison until everyone gets sick of it and just wants the hate and bullshit to end. They are exercising their veto and they know they only need to stick at it until it finally works.

On a scarcely believable episode of Political Thinking, Tom Watson explains that noted surveillance company Palantir doesn’t match his definition of “surveillance capitalism” and has the UK’s best interests at heart. His greatest ethical regret, he explains at length is having worked with Corbyn.

Or sometimes as anyone with GB News relatives will know, you disagree about both facts and values, at which point it’s impossible to talk about politics at all so you learn nothing and just gradually (or rapidly!) stop talking.

Justin Wolfers@justinwolfers.bsky.social

The best cure for ideological bias is find someone on the other side and go to lunch with them.⁣ ⁣ Sometimes we disagree about facts. Sometimes we disagree about values. Figuring out which is which is fun part. https://newsletter.platypuseconomics.com/p/my-libertarian-friends-were-right

Disagreeing on facts vs values is probably a good way of thinking about it and finding common ground with some people, but a lot of the time it’s both, and hey if somebody thinks there’s 100,000 refugees entering the UK each year and also they’re all criminals, what am I supposed to do with that