Chris

Chris

@skipischris.bsky.social

THE FOLLOWING TIMELINE CONTAINS COARSE LANGUAGE AND DUE TO ITS CONTENT SHOULD NOT BE VIEWED BY ANYONE. GO OILERS. ♈☀️♈🌙♊↗️ LET'S SMILE WHEN WE MEET.

893 followers897 following1.3K posts

Today, I’m taking my Alberta flag back. I’m tired of seeing it claimed by a separatist movement I do not support. If Alberta is your home, it’s your flag too. I want Alberta’s future to be in Canada. Fiercely Albertan. Proudly Canadian. #ableg #abpoli 1/2

Some of you may remember “The Wrecking Ball Part 1” and “The Wrecking Ball Part 2.” Both began here as threads. This is Part 3: what happens after the law passes, the vote is counted, and somebody has to make the machinery work? #ableg #abpoli 1/53

View full thread

This thread follows the record through September 30, 2026: spring laws, health restructuring, petitions, voter-list rules and the October 19 referendum. The connection is a question about government, not evidence that these events were one coordinated project. 4/53

A bill passes. The press conference ends. Then the machinery has to run on Monday morning. The Legislature can authorize change; regulations, administrators, institutions and people still have to make it work. 5/53

Some of you may remember “The Wrecking Ball Part 1” and “The Wrecking Ball Part 2.” Both began here as threads. This is Part 3: what happens after the law passes, the vote is counted, and somebody has to make the machinery work? #ableg #abpoli 1/53

A vote can authorize a direction. A law can authorize a change. Neither tells us, by itself, whether the machinery will work afterward. That is the question I keep coming back to in Alberta: what, exactly, are we being asked to authorize? 2/53

YES!!!

Senator Paula Simons 🇨🇦@senatorpaulasimons.bsky.social

I keep meeting smart informed Albertans who tell me they do not intend to vote, because they don’t want to legitimize the process, or because they know the premier is not bound by the results. But what if making us give up on voting is the whole point? My argument to vote - no matter the absurdity.

Chris reposted

this 👇 everyone, esp the separatists, are twisting the wording to suit their purpose. don't fall for it

Chris@skipischris.bsky.social

I’m tired. Not of disagreement. Disagreement is fine. I’m tired of watching people rewrite this referendum into something more comfortable than what is actually on the ballot. The Order in Council is attached. Read it. #ableg #abpoli 1/9

I’m tired. Not of disagreement. Disagreement is fine. I’m tired of watching people rewrite this referendum into something more comfortable than what is actually on the ballot. The Order in Council is attached. Read it. #ableg #abpoli 1/9

View full thread

The ballot says “remain a province of Canada.” Others hear “I’m happy with everything Ottawa does.” Neither is what the ballot says. Maybe the hardest thing in politics is reading the question in front of us instead of the question we wish we’d been asked. 8/9

Apparently I’m going to keep saying this until October 19: Read the ballot. Not the sales pitch. And don’t tell somebody else what their vote “really” means when the words are sitting right there in front of all of us. #ableg #abpoli 9/9

I’m tired. Not of disagreement. Disagreement is fine. I’m tired of watching people rewrite this referendum into something more comfortable than what is actually on the ballot. The Order in Council is attached. Read it. #ableg #abpoli 1/9

View full thread

I want Alberta to defend its jurisdiction, negotiate hard, challenge Ottawa when necessary and use its influence to help build a stronger Canada. I don’t believe we need to threaten to dismantle the country Alberta helped build in order to demand better from it. 6/9

This keeps bringing me back to goal-protective reasoning. Once we want an outcome badly enough, we can start bending the evidence around it. The ballot says “binding referendum on separation.” Some people hear “leverage.” 7/9

I’m tired. Not of disagreement. Disagreement is fine. I’m tired of watching people rewrite this referendum into something more comfortable than what is actually on the ballot. The Order in Council is attached. Read it. #ableg #abpoli 1/9

View full thread

There is nothing there about “leverage.” Nothing about “sending Ottawa a message.” And please stop telling people why they’re voting Option 1. I’m not choosing Option 1 because I’m happy with the status quo. Quite the opposite. 4/9

Part of the Alberta status quo I’m exhausted by is grievance politics itself. Every fight with Ottawa becomes proof Confederation is broken. Every disagreement becomes another reason to threaten separation. I want better than that. 5/9

I’m tired. Not of disagreement. Disagreement is fine. I’m tired of watching people rewrite this referendum into something more comfortable than what is actually on the ballot. The Order in Council is attached. Read it. #ableg #abpoli 1/9

Lately I keep hearing two things: “Option 2 is leverage.” And now, increasingly: “Quebec did it.” Maybe those arguments have simply caught on. Fine. But neither changes what Question 10 actually says. 2/9

Option 1 says Alberta should remain a province of Canada. Option 2 says the Alberta government should begin the legal process required to hold a binding referendum on whether Alberta should separate from Canada. That’s the choice. 3/9

🚨 My Alberta referendum mail ballot arrived. It contained ONE of 10 ballots. I called Elections Alberta. The rep confirmed this wasn't the first complaint and said a third-party contractor handling ballots “messed up on their side too.” Check your package. #ableg #abpoli

Chris reposted

"Educate yourselves." Ok. Let's go. Alberta has 10 referendum ballots on Oct. 19. I went through every one. I love Alberta. I love Canada. I don't believe those things conflict. Here's how I'm voting, and why. 🧵 #ableg #abpoli 1/31

View full thread

🍁 BALLOT 1 — Q10 Should Alberta remain a province of Canada, or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada? 3/31

Option 1: Alberta should remain a province of Canada. Option 2: Begin the legal process required to hold a binding provincial referendum on separation. I'm selecting OPTION 1. I'm an Albertan and a Canadian. I reject the idea that I have to choose between the two. 4/31

"Educate yourselves." Ok. Let's go. Alberta has 10 referendum ballots on Oct. 19. I went through every one. I love Alberta. I love Canada. I don't believe those things conflict. Here's how I'm voting, and why. 🧵 #ableg #abpoli 1/31

One quick note before we start: Elections Alberta calls the separation question Question 10, but it will be handed to voters first. So I'm calling it Ballot 1 and then following the order voters will receive them. The questions below use the official wording. 2/31

There are multiple groups, multiple leaders, multiple strategies, and, frankly, multiple endgames. Which is why, when someone says they support separation, my first question now is: which version? #ableg

Jason Markusoff@markusoff.bsky.social

Separationland Who’s Who: A wrote a field guide to the confusing jumble of groups cropping up on both the leave and stay sides. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/... You’re welcome.

Jason Markusoff’s CBC piece is worth reading because it lays out something important: There isn’t one Alberta separation movement. #ableg

“Bad governments love two things: winning, and pretending the rules are neutral while they tinker with them.” #ableg

Chris@skipischris.bsky.social

The Danielle Smith Legislative Ledger – “The Wrecking Ball” Part 2 – Who Wants A Notwithstanding Clause? I’m baaaack. Last time we mapped the pattern. This time we follow where it leads. Fall 2025. The hammer dropped, and a government tested how far power can stretch. #ableg

“It is about saying that if this government insists on governing with a crowbar, then somebody had better keep measuring the dents in the wall.” #ableg

Chris@skipischris.bsky.social

The Danielle Smith Legislative Ledger – “The Wrecking Ball” Part 2 – Who Wants A Notwithstanding Clause? I’m baaaack. Last time we mapped the pattern. This time we follow where it leads. Fall 2025. The hammer dropped, and a government tested how far power can stretch. #ableg

Chris reposted

“That is how democratic damage settles in. Not all at once. Gradually. Repeatedly. Until extraordinary things start sounding ordinary.” #ableg

Chris@skipischris.bsky.social

The Danielle Smith Legislative Ledger – “The Wrecking Ball” Part 2 – Who Wants A Notwithstanding Clause? I’m baaaack. Last time we mapped the pattern. This time we follow where it leads. Fall 2025. The hammer dropped, and a government tested how far power can stretch. #ableg

“That is not a healthy democracy protecting itself. That is a government retraining the public not to flinch.” #ableg

Chris@skipischris.bsky.social

The Danielle Smith Legislative Ledger – “The Wrecking Ball” Part 2 – Who Wants A Notwithstanding Clause? I’m baaaack. Last time we mapped the pattern. This time we follow where it leads. Fall 2025. The hammer dropped, and a government tested how far power can stretch. #ableg

“This government does not usually announce the real project in plain terms. It wraps the crowbar in soft cloth and asks you to admire the stitching.” #ableg

Chris@skipischris.bsky.social

The Danielle Smith Legislative Ledger – “The Wrecking Ball” Part 2 – Who Wants A Notwithstanding Clause? I’m baaaack. Last time we mapped the pattern. This time we follow where it leads. Fall 2025. The hammer dropped, and a government tested how far power can stretch. #ableg