Post

Don't worry, anything that gets a small amount of attention and can atteact a ragebait market WILL be discoursed to death Everything needs to be a controversy!

Great article. I pray for the day that defensiveness no longer defines progressive media discourse. I remember the exact dynamic you describe with Mixtape happening with Frozen and the new Star Wars trilogy.

Its some condolation that through all the Gamergate honking and academic wank, Beethoven and Dinosaur have probably sold a huge number of extra games. And really thats what matters - seeing a small studio succeed when everything is in shambled

It's meant to make you feel nostalgic, so if that makes you sad, it might be best to steer clear of it. Also, (and this is not giving anything away) it's the main character's last day in town, so again... And one of the characters' dads is a bit of a dick. But other than that, it's all pretty happy.

bsky.app/profile/epsi... reconnecting my reply since the connecting reply was deleted

Epsi@epsirho.com

it is, this idea that the discourse is mostly over review scores is disingenuous. The main problem people have is that the game just isn't good, nor is it really a game. The complaints I've seen are all about lackluster story and "gameplay" that continues without your input no matter what.

A lot of early hate was over review scores. Later, when people pointed out that gaming websites have been hopelessly corrupt and taking backhanders from publishers for decades) it turned into the notion that #Mixtape isn't good and isn't a game. It's all just drama queens being drama queens.

I think the backlash is generally the dumbest shit I've seen in a while they keep posting shit like IGN GAVE THIS 10/10 BUT GAVE CRIMSON DESERT A 6/10 like they were done by the same fucking people, they weren't, you know if you don't like it, just don't fucking play it ffs no one's forcing it on u

It's an enjoyable game centred around music and memories. You can pick it up and put it down. You don't need skill, you only need time. There's no reason for anyone to get shirty about it. Mind you, aspects of this are a vibe (albeit for different reasons) across other sectors.

pickr.com.auCharlatan journalism and why this practice needs to stop – PickrThere's nothing wrong with influencing, provided it's coming from a good place. But when it's simply paid, you need to call it out for what it is.

But also that your piece was a great yarn. I had no idea Mixtape had become THAT controversial. I just saw the trailer and wanted to play it. That's how it's supposed to work, right?

MixTape is essentially the latest culmination/symptoms of the problem surrounding corporate game and journalism. By itself, it's fine. Not really a game but I can see some people enjoying it. But the media hype around it and the score discrepancy in supposed "critics" pretty much

I think the discourse around it "not really being a game" is telling. Whether it's really a game or not just doesn't matter. There are sections that allow you to do things that don't change the outcome, and that's whimsical. Requiring a fail state might actually be a problem with you and not it.

But the problem with game reviewers being paid by mega corporations to give stellar reviews has been going on for twenty plus years. So it just seems weird that people chose this year and this game to call them out on it. And the ire seems directed more at the game than the corrupt reviewers.

And yet in reality, it's not games journalists that get paid, it's your youtubers that you so fanatically worship. They're considered cheap advertisement material in the industry, did you know that? Nobody paid to have these outlets promote mixtape. You just can't handle that some people like it.

Critics are humans giving their opinions. So, yeah there is going to be some natural discrepancy. Combined with the type of game this is makes it more so. It's not pay or a conspiracy some people vibe with it, mostly kids of the 90s. And others don't, inexplicably also kids of the 90s.

I literally never read reviews for a game, nor do I watch creators' hot take on them. I read the description, watch the trailer, and check user reviews to see if there are any big bugs. I can't fathom why anyone would care so much about critics' reviews.

I have one nitpick: Nathan Grayson claims #Mixtape "feels rooted in a very specific kind of white guy’s teenage experience." Considering two of the three main characters are not white, and two are girls, I think he's off target. What the game feels rooted in is the middle class suburban experience.

I’m in unc territory, pushing 40. I really enjoyed this for what it was, I can’t say I’d ever want to go back to my own youth but it’s nice to play something that captures that sense of youth and reflecting on your formative years before you have to say goodbye to them in a fun, easy playing way.

You realize that critics do not define “facts”, correct? That they only ever share opinions, albeit educated opinions, and therefore have NEVER “lied” to anyone? It’s totally 100% fair to disagree with a critic. I’m a big fan of RLM but I disagree with them on a lot of their takes.

"But the truth is that relatively few people care about written game reviews these days... The very content creators who accuse IGN and other sites of misusing their influence are the real tastemakers of the modern era" Yes, 100% this.

I dont normally straight watch the Geoff Keighley “Hideo Kojima please talk to me awards” normally via someone else reacting to it. But i remember rolling my eyes at Mixtape in watching the last few years. i didn’t like the 80’s nostalgia games, seeing it signalled for me the wave switching to 90’s

Do these people that cry “it came out of nowhere” not actually engage with gaming and gaming news outside of The Anger Bubble™️?? do they browse coming soon sections or sales to find a gem? do they actually game? last years game awards had 17 million viewers not that its a bastion of games but ???

What "came out of nowhere" is the fact that a game genre these chuds hate got ratings of 10/10. And to these folks, that's a capital offense. They think no cozy game deserves a 10/10: they think those sorts of ratings belong to action games where you shoot things endlessly. It really is exhausting.

So, I’m 100% the “Type Of Guy” who this panders too, and I’m 1000% happy this, I won’t say “game”, but “experience”, exists. But I don’t naively think everyone lived it, and I agree it’s fucked up that games that don’t specifically cater to ME have not found homes or funding.