Post

this is an astounding way to refer to an adaptation of Neuromancer. incredible headline work if your goal is to send a bunch of thirtysomethings on a rage spiral.

268 reposts1.1K likes

Oh for fuck's sake. Entertainment news writing is a shitshamble of mind games and disrespect regardless of the properties (mis)represented. The next fucking thing on the bingo card is a right wing outrage into right wing grift featuring some actually nonexistant drama about the property.

Bruh, sometimes marketing teams need to be taken behind the shed out back and their replacements forced to watch. How hard was it to put "The father of the cyberpunk genre" ???

I saw Mistborn described as "Dune meets Lord of the Rings" because: * It is an epic fantasy (arguably inaccurate, but w/e), "a genre tracing its roots back to J. R. R. Tolkien's LOTR" * "Its setting is a fallen world full of mist and ash, not entirely unlike the sandy wastes of Arrakis in Dune"

Where did this convention of not referring to the actual thing/person by name in the headline originate from. Like why is everything an epithet? I can't believe it's just modern clickbait practices.

it’s called a “high concept pitch” and that’s how hollywood has worked since at least the 90s but they used to keep it internal to the biz only and actually market the product they were selling as its own thing, with only passing reference to other media sometimes

Only way I can see this is that it assumes that people who watch TV are incapable of also reading books, this show is like these other things you may have seen

“It’s a bit like Harry Potter meets Lord of the Rings meets Moana” - me describing a new Earthsea adaptation, shortly before being beaten to death by the left hand of nerdiness