Post

Can the co-author be whatever Stackoverflow post/FOSS project the LLM was trained on? If it's going to geg-in and claim credit that should go to the actual source.

VSCodium is better

opt-in getting flipped to opt-out specifically for git history is a different category of mistake. devs treat that log as documentation.

the actual issue isn't copilot. it's that git history is sacred to a lot of devs and microsoft just decided to write to it without asking. that's a different kind of violation

very biased, but I'd argue helix is much easier to learn than (neo)vim and similarly powerful (or much more powerful if we're only comparing out-of-the-box experience) helix-editor.com (neo)vim does support plugins, however, so the ceiling on features is much much higher

I do like Zed a lot, but it doesn't have the same feeling of Nova. I too often use LLMs in a terminal window, but Antigravity's UI for them is kinda nice. Just wish it was native and better designed.

Oh, so that's what did it. Wondered why that had started appearing on all my commits in our Gitlab instance. What a dick move to give me a description to delete every time I make a MR

same logic as the old 'sent from my iPhone' default signature. except apple let you delete it on day one.

the watermarks-in-footers era lasted way too long. at least email signatures eventually became opt-in.

Microsoft has always been primarily a marketing company.

thanks to AI, product managers can now destroy a product without the help of an engineer!

VSCodium are patching this github.com/VSCodium/vsc... why didn't we switch years ago 😒

no gun has enough bullets

Yeah that math doesn’t make any sense

Excellent question! Also entirely unclear as to how this data will be used, what the “right” answer is, and how to meaningfully compare one developer’s self reported metric with another’s.