Post

This is a Labour peer interviewing a Labour minister, here. It makes it helpfully clear how we are governed, does it not.

83 reposts315 likes

But what does this graph tell us? Recruitment of military is a choice made by govt. But the number of disabled depends on the vicissitudes of life. How are they related? Are these members of the Labour govt. insinuating that more pip claimants than military means some pip claimants are frauds?

I watched this and was unsure of the point they were trying to make. The size of the army is the size they want it to be. If every one of those 430,000 applied for army jobs tomorrow they would be turned down.

It's instructive to watch so called "Labour" AGAIN try to force the sick and infirm to work for benefits while cutting taxes on activities that earn money but require no work, like landlords or investments. Fuck this upside down economy where labor is paid pennies and assholes don't pay tax

Putting the numbers side by side is so brain dead, what is it even supposed to mean. Armed forces personnel vs Number of people who watched celebrity traitors

The Labour party bragged about the Human Rights Act and Equality Act and Gender Recognition Act when it suited them. Now they pretend they don't exist. Two women who benefited from equality being chummy over who they can fuck over. No different from the men they're emulating.

Its an issue i dont think we all talk about enough, how women in politics end up supporting and benefiting from the misogynistic patriarchal system that oppressed them, so long as they support it, they get benefits

Anyone equating PIP with recipients with armed forces personnel is clearly incapable of thought. One soldier does not cost the maximum possible PIP award, more like 10x that in salary, provisions, etc. And PIP is not an unemployment benefit. MPs should think of it as support for awkward work...

...like, say, subsidised high- quality meals, expensed second homes, staff, convenient £5m gifts for "security" and everything else they _benefit_ from even if they don't have impacts from disability. And hey, if they do have those impacts, they can claim PIP.

WTAF is going on with the graph? I mean, sticking up a graph comparing members of the armed forces against number of pensioners receiving the state pension would hardly be much less meaningful. God forbid the state should have multiple responsibilities.

It shows once more that there is no debate or discussion about anything in this country. There’s only ever these people, all together on the same side, forcefully imposing their desires on everyone. They do not listen to any kind of disagreement, you are simply an obstacle that must be overcome.