Post

i dont really see what this has to do with competitive pokemon

oh dear, it appears they forgot the part where you incur an attack of opportunity and then have to succeed on a melee touch attack against their armor class minus any armor, shield or natural bonuses (except dexterity modifier which they get to keep), before you start aggregating the review scores.

The entire site and all its contents look exactly like what you'd get if you asked Claude to make it and write all the text in it for you after shutting yourself in a room conversing with it for days without talking to another human being

Just say you're putting an arbitrary skew on steam review recommendation % and save the jibber jabber

This reads like the abstract of an academic paper in which they had to condense a 50 page paper into a single paragraph.

Wait is this from Video Games Chronicle? They never struck me as having shit like this in their site up to now

Working in tech means I have to read this kind of stuff every single day. I can recognize AI slop at a hundred paces now

I could only get to the end of the first parenthetical before I started having flashbacks to reading undergrad research papers.

I'm the kind of sicko that has a spreadsheet tracking ratings & comments for the 1800+ games I've played, and I still only made it 1/3rd of the way through

Steam rating = good, reviewer rating = 2 normal person review score, we have a propreitary formular to apply weights to newer reviews. Basically summed that up for you.

Do these words mean anything?

the recommendation knows where it is because it knows where it isn't

Ah, yes. We all hate it when... *reading again* ...small samples peg scales?

OMG, where is this from

...for granted and never stop to consider how insane their redefining of things comes accross.