Post

Professional crank Armond White, ladies and gentlemen:

In the first sentence, they start complaining that the filmmakers didn't make an entirely different movie about completely different people. No point reading any further.

I think NRO has him employed because they share worldviews. Reactionary assholes have to stick together

Versimilitude!

Don’t you dare trip me out

Wait until they hear about John Wilson or Werner Herzog

First sentence tells me all I need to know.

Haha! Yes. Well put.

Holy shit what a dogshit way to start an article.

Love that he lists his credentials of detesting every innovative documentary of the past fifty years. Half expected him to cite Robert Flaherty as the last real documentarian!

Was not crazy about the picture myself, but not angry that it wasn't an expose of ... Elizabeth Warren? Uh wut?

Next you will tell me that the center cannot hold...or that the law is indeterminate....or that objectivity is a myth

Yes. Also that.

conservatives telling on themselves alert 🚨

Also, he wasn't mad. Don't write that he was mad. /wint

Seems like the whole complaint here boils down to "why isn't he doing a hit on Warren or Cheney instead"?

[ See also the reviews of every M. Night movie after The Sixth Sense where they were like " I spotted the twist!" There was no twist, my friend. You're just sore about 1999.]

There is also a mild spoiler in the review so if you are trying to avoid "the hideous deception" of the film, don't read the entire review and just go see the film. The review doesn't really give it away but does reveal something that the marketing & other reviews avoid.

Without a doubt the author thinks Millenials are 19 years old

Maybe I'm just old but it brings to mind Hitchens' "The Lies Of Michael Moore", which did not in fact identify one single solitary lie.

It does mess with your brain but NRO is just gloming onto the hype. bsky.app/profile/r-s-...

"Liz Cheney... liberal"