Post

🚨🚨🚨 Jeffrey Epstein during a 2010 deposition: Q. Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18? A: Though l'd like to answer that question, at least today l'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights, sir.

2.7K reposts6.9K likes

And he was murdered. Maxwell should reach out to someone trustworthy. (If one exists) ask for protective custody and tell the fucking truth! Even if she pleads the 5th, she can still spill tea…..she knows too much, and will always be a danger to Trump

it’s already taking the repugs an extra whole week to try to come up with some way to forgive him. or to get “the guys “ together and watch all the tapes? can’t decide which one. this should be good !

This video and the video of a victim’s secret interview detailing his perverted pedophilia actions on her and another girl when she was 13…are all the evidence we need for proof he was just as guilty as Epstein.

Please Google: Title 18 USC 242, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law. Red State legislators have deprived people's rights by enacting Republican bigotry laws. The 9th Amendment mandates America; Rights given to constitutional authority shall "NOT" be used to take away the people's rights.

Need timeline graphic: Friends bef '93 at Marla wedding, 13yo Katie Johnson rape accusation '94, Carroll rape '95/6, Jeff caught '03, Stormy & Playboy bunny abt 2006, plea deal '08. Stormy, Carroll and Katie descriptions track with similar m/o IMHO. Disinformation in 2016 here abt lawyer oddly ...

lawandcrime.comYes, Donald Trump Was Accused of Raping a 13 Year Old, But This Lawsuit Has Little Chance of Succeeding | Law & CrimeA similar lawsuit was filed in federal court in Southern California in April by a "Katie Johnson" and was subsequently dismissed. Alan Garten, an attorney for Donald Trump, says the allegations are "u...

...taken at face value by legacy media that barely or didn't report on Katie's rape accusations at all. 2016 was her second try to speak & 2nd reaction extreme intimidation. Meagher website didn't disappear. Her case tracks with his regular pro bono commitment. Nothing strange except threat to him.

...Everybody: Read Katie Johnson's lawsuit. It all tracks on the two men's methods, relationship/sexual rivalry/perversions and Mafia'esque intimidation tactics very corroborated and very clear since Katie in 1994. Instead of dismissing as a crank, if she comes out of hiding, BELIEVE. THE. WOMEN!!!

...Can't stop thinking about how odd it is that this Law & Crime reporting implies legal flaws when nothing about this is unusual. California would have been the wrong jurisdiction for a rape in NYC, so of course it was dismissed there. Of course, a presidential candidacy would stir the stress, etc

This is one, of many, reasons why Trump feels the urgent need to distract attention away from this case, cover it up and punish others. He’s pulled out the big guns, showing desperation, to go after Biden and Obama. He’s one scared narcissistic psychopath right now.

If the ol’ Bone Spurs were to retroactively lower the age of consent to 13, his Epstein woes would end, overnight. Like a miracle.

FACT: There is absolutely no doubt that both Trump and Epstein routinely raped underage girls. Both should have been locked up for life at least 25 years ago.

That footage was also in the 'Filthy Rich' 2020 documentary that also has victims & witnesses as well exposed quite a few of the other paedophile perpetrators besides Trump. Epstein showed how much of a coward he was by pleading the 5th & had no conscious whatever what he did to those young girls.

Can anyone explain the invocations of the 6th and 14th? I’m a lawyer with some fair understanding of criminal procedure and I don’t think I’ve ever seen an invocation like this. Did he mean to imply something, or is he a doofus who read the Wiki for “criminal procedure” and went “random bullshit go”

Like is he saying “on advice of counsel I’m going to preserve my due process rights and refuse to answer” like he’s trying to get extra credit?

That looks really bad, especially because he did answer the preceding questions about having a relationship with Trump. So it’s not like he was just taking the 5th all down the line. But that particular question, he wouldn’t answer. If it had been no, seems like he would have just said no.

From the current moment in time, one wonders whether covering up the Epstein files could have been way up there on Trump’s list of motivations to run for a second term: 1. Cover up the EPSTEIN files 2. Stay out of jail for previous indictments 1/2

I think it’s looking more and more like the oligarchs, lead by Murdock, have turned on Trump and want to dump him in favor of Vance. Trump has outlived his usefulness and is now more a liability for their agenda.

Vance is already working on a scheme to push Trump out of the way. Vance knows that Trump is a liability to him. And Vance’s agenda is going much further than Trump’s agenda. It all looks like the consecutive assassinations during the Roman empire.

If that's true, it misses the effect on Trumps followers if he is no longer in power. Republicans have only the slimmest of majorities in all three branches. Dear Leader being pushed out in disgrace won't be enough to discourage enough MAGAs to swing a handful of elections?

That’s true. The calculation would be the damage he’s doing to support among non-hardcore MAGA (young men, Hispanics who voted for him etc) as opposed to his hold on hardcore MAGA. I also think Mamdani’s success in NYC has them really scared and they see Trump as a catalyst for the emergence of 1/2

I once read an article in Vanity Fair about the Lolita Express & Epstein's island. They obviously had a copy of the flight logs & among the people they named who were on it: Trump & Bill Clinton. I'm sure Epstein flew many more places than his island, so it still proves nothing but it looks bad.