Post

One line in the Abrego Garcia matter uttered by SCOTUS: that the court must give due regard and deference to POTUS in matters of national security and foreign affairs. That was John Roberts’ hint to Trump on how to get what he wants.

Kyle Cheney@kyledcheney.bsky.social

President Trump knows that one way to gain advantage in the legal fight over a controversial construction project is to link it to a military need

442 reposts1.4K likes

So now everything he wants will be a matter of National Security. Can’t wait to see how creative they get to put his face on Mount Rushmore or the Kennedy Center. 

I've been hanging by a thread for so long that I can't even remember what 'normal' feels like. The terrible effects Trump has had on the mental and physical health of the country will be studied for years to come.

Maxima@maxima-infinity.bsky.social

. Trump has changed an eyesore in the middle of Washington, Into a prospective soft military target in the middle of Washington. Terrorists (or Revolutionaries) could easily take it out but with a lot of collateral damage. Trump's siege mentality, akin to Putin's, is becoming pathological. .

When he thought they would stop him from building his ballroom, he got the idea that he could call it necessary for national security. That worked. Now he is going to try it here.

Trump is clearly their (Federalist Society) vessel for destroying democracy and then we’ll be run by an imperial court or some other paid and bought slub as the unitary executive. We the people intend to stop them.

Dwumpy is a toy. He's Trumpy-Ruxpin. He's got a battery operated heart, and his right leg has servo assisted joints. Pull his cord and he says, "Sharks, batteries, electrocuted." There's not enuf left there up top to add 2 + 2.

There is NO FACILITY anywhere in the WORLD like what Trump wants bc other COUNTRIES don’t allow INEPT STUPID PETTY NARCISSISTS like Trump to LOOT their TREASURY to build MONUMENTS to their EVIL SELVES!

Everything from tariffs, to ballroom to arch, it's *national security*. I'm surprised he didn't find a way to call the Reflecting Pool a national security project. BTW, the Department of Interior/NPS need to be sued for misappropriation of funds. Doug Burgum needs to warm a hearing chair in 2027.

But really since he’s constructing it without a congressional approval, would a future president even need congressional approval for removal like what was argued as needed for the East Wing demolition and ballroom vanity project? If it was never approved by statute, it should be removable.

Slime bag Roberts…hopefully he contracts measles or another RFKj revitalized disease incurring pain & suffering commensurate with his vast criminal management approach to the courts.

So, he'd be diverting drones - of which, I'm not sure they have that many - from his (already won 🙄) war with Iran to protect DC (Arlington, mostly- a CEMETERY) from...those who oppose him in general AND the war, one among a plethora of specific grievances? Isn't that usually called treason?

How much bullshit could a bullshiter shit when a bullshiter does shit bull. He would shit all the bull that a bullshiter could if a bullshiter could shit bull. Nothing Trump says is either truth or beneficial to Americans.

I'm so sick of "national security" & "for the children". They are both meaningless excuses to strip us of liberty, gives more power to the state & makes absolutely no one safer.

Yes - exactly this. He wants his ballroom and arch, so he labels them as "national security" to avoid having to actually get approval. Basically, his "reasons" are always BS - Trump decides what he wants, and the rest of the gang looks for a vaguely legal way to do it.

I'm sure he might try to finagle this argument into the Kennedy Center somehow. 'Put my name on it or I'll destroy it. It's for national security!'

Turning that obscene arch into a military fortress might be because he is worried that those soldiers resting in Arlington after giving their all might rise up to kick a fascist ass one more time.

Then the next Democratic POTUS can use national security as an excuse to tear it all down. Every Confederate statue on federal land is a national security threat too. Tear them all down.

Is it because he's gonna need those snipers and drones to resist us coming in to drag his festering carcass out? If so, it's not a very good plan. I think most of us would be okay with high altitude carpet bombing of DC to be rid of him. Prolly cheaper than fumigation anyway.

No Kings 4: Impeach, Convict, Remove. Oct. 17th. Everyone in the streets, demanding impeachment. We demand every candidate vow to impeach. Articles on Hegseth created so much panic they just shut down. It's a weak spot. Tell your organizers. mobilize.us/s/zQQ3ZP

mobilize.usAre You Ready for No Kings: Impeach Convict Remove?? · Mobilize"What are we gonna do? How are we gonna stop this? Why aren't we demanding impeachment?" Are you an organizer who has heard these questions many times over the last year? Have you had diminishing att...

If he says it's a matter of national security, he gets almost everything he wants thanks to the billionaires giving John Roberts, Alito & Thomas heaps of gold. They're all traitors to America & must be impeached asap.

Rename his clubhouse Empire of Peace and mount 50 cal machine guns all over it and dress Kristi Noem as a Killer Warrior Bitch and charge more money to pay Year 2 dues.

I hate to read his drivel, but actually did to see that he wants to put snipers at the arch site ... what would they be there to protect, the bridge? It could be destroyed from beyond sniper range too easily. The entry to Arlington Cemetery? It hardly needs that kind of protection. A TOTAL waste!

Maybe he should be told that the reason that nobody else around the world has a facility like he is describing, is that everybody else in the world realizes that it is one of the dumbest ideas ever made!

The Supreme Court needs to be investigated. They are guilty of several ethics violations. Would it be a surprise to find out they had broken the law. Several women have died since they overturned Roe. They never once said, “that’s not what we meant.” They are morally responsible.

Due regard and deference only requires such regard and deference as are due. That means it needs to pass the ho-ho test, which is a very low bar, to get Roberts's vote. Trump kind of blows that every time he opens his mouth on unTruth antiSocial. It will be hard for Roberts to pretend this time.

Absolutely. I just said this to my husband this morning when he asked me what the orange fucktwat had said about the fucking arch.

The snipers are for us. Remember on June 1, 2020, Trump said this about protestors: Can't you just shoot them? Just shoot them in the legs or something?" If we win on Nov. 3, we must impeach and remove--immediately!

Now why would the military be useful there? Unless it is not for foreign attacks. Maybe they are worried that the US is tired of their bullshite and will vote them out. And that would allow them to retire their bullshite and leave peacefully, like they did before...

It’s unthinkable, literally unbelievable, that we have SC justices + the chief justice himself who are enabling the undermining of democracy, the rise of fascism, all of the pain & suffering that comes with it. What the bloody hell do they think they’re achieving — how do they live with themselves!