Post

Making cakes - protected expression. Literal performance - not protected. 🙄

As soon as we take back congress, impeach Cannon & this guy. Would love to see Alito get impeached too.

Fucking wow.

🤡

No law, no precedent, just the desired outcome of right wing crackpots that want fascism in the US.

Yet the 1A was used to legalize massive donations to PACs

#FedSocSix SCOTUS next June: " "The 1st Amendment says "CONGRESS shall make no law ... " but it is utterly silent on the power of right-wing judges in regulating free speech and expression. If the Founders wanted to constrain right-wing judges, they would have said so explicitly. "

Isn't political speech necessary for self-government? Turn the whole damn show into a drag lampoon of Kacsmaryk and SCOTUS.

“Judge” Kacsmaryk is about as white hood as any judge can be so there’s that.

"I can't define unprotected speech, but I know it when I see it." --Justice Potter Stewart

That is one novel interpretation of the First Amendment

Bong hits for Jesus?

That judge makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up. I remember when he was confirmed.

First Amendment protects speech necessary for self-governance… and the government gets to decide what that is… (That’s not how it works in America…)

free speech for me but not for thee.

So only money is protected????

well, they knew it when they see it

Calls them "libertines" no less. Forward to the 18th Century.

It’s only free speech if it’s a SCOTUS’s home flying a Christian Nationalist flag to antagonize their neighbors

Damn cheek of these college libertines. In my day, an evening’s entertainment consisted of several ladies in modest costume singing “Daisy,” followed by a little pantomime in blackface. Gave the boys quite a chuckle, too.

Absolute crap

“Originally, we weren’t free.” First 1960, then 1860, and now jumping straight to 1660.