Post

when I was younger I thought the subplot of Ender’s Game in which Ender’s siblings shitpost themselves into running the world was the least realistic part of the book I am coming around to the idea that it was by far the most realistic

502 reposts4.7K likes

The part how Ender and his friends eagerly pursued to xenocide a sentient species because they had been trained and condition not to believe what they were doing had any real world effects until the rug got pulled out from under them feels too real given how people treat politics as. "Just a game!"

The unrealistic part is that they'd become wildly popular by posting intellectual essays on social philosophy instead of dank meming each other into power. Card was an early adopter of social media and "BBS will save humanity!" is a recurring theme in his 90s work

Good that you point it out! Everyone needs to learn about this weakness, and how to deal with it. On the other side of the story, we need to take back control and stop to overwhelming amount of bots, fake news and rampant LLM's churning out new problems at an astonishing rate.

Of course, Orson Scott Card wasn't inventing the idea. He had seen how effective judicious sock puppeting could be on BBSes and the early internet, and was just extrapolating what would happen as they became more universal.

Well, in Card's defense, this kinda agora-style, "public intellectual discourse combat" was how it used to work. Hamilton/Madison/Jay's Federalist Papers (which I suspect inspired Card at least some 🙂) & then Buckley/Vidal later. It's only recently, in the internet age, such doesn't work anymore.🤷‍♂️

Fiction only looked more interesting than real life in the past because the level of mundane stupidity was filtered through history books and the news. Except for the Joseon imperial historians, bless them and their dedication.

Ender's Game predicted coming to power through posting on the net. The Sprawl Trilogy predicted that the technology will lead to the rise of the hyper rich, who will become inhuman. The Diamond Age predicted that corporations and the hyper rich will achieve sovereignty.

when I first started on FB I used to let my shitposting account's argue with each other because that was the only useful fun bit of anything that I got from those books

Being a man (most likely a man) of the people is almost a requirement of authoritarian figures...and that most often means anti-intellectual. Reminds me of that Blazing Saddles scene...

Orson Welles actually sat next to Hitler at a dinner and described him as completely unremarkable and forgettable. faroutmagazine.co.uk/adolf-hitler... They're not geniuses, they're mediocre men who resent the world treating them as such. Musk, Trump, Hegseth, Vance, etc. Empty losers at heart.

faroutmagazine.co.ukWhen Adolf Hitler met Orson Welles and left no impressionOrson Welles met many famous people, but when he sat down with Adolf Hitler at a Nazi Party meeting, the Austrian-German left no impression on him whatsoever.

The book was also written before the internet was largely a thing, so he also predicted not only how to gain power from the internet, but also like *the internet itself*. Wild. Too bad he’s such a homophobe, but it prepared me for the JKR moral betrayal 😅

Who’d thunk that a film about the dumbing down of a civilization—would be an actual historical event? Feel as if another dimension stole my body and switched me to a clusterf*ck world.

Who knew that all people actually want is someone to tell them how angry they should be about absolute nonsense and bull crap? I want a leader who isn't a walking, talking shit post 🤧

I’m at Orson Scott Card at a sci-fi convention and sadly he’s an asshole and that just completely ruined my ability to enjoy anything he’s written

The reason I don't believe that part is because the smarter you are, the less likely you are to understand what regular people react to and follow. Successful populists like Turnip appear to all be half-wits who stumble into power by amplifying the lowest common denominator.

I've never bought Trump being a half-wit. He's anti-intellectual, and most dumb on anything requiring book learning. But the man is insidious...he understands human nature and how to manipulate it.

The idea that somebody would act as dumb as him on purpose is INSANE. I'm not talking about his speech patterns or choice of simple vocabulary, I'm talking about the absolute nonsense he's constantly spewing. He WISHES he was smart, and ACTS like he knows everything. But he is the opposite.

I absolutely disagree. He is a typical ignorant Conservative + billions in net worth inherited. The man bankrupted a CASINO. People who act like Turnip or fElon are intelligent do not understand what intelligence looks like. They both have some skill in certain areas, but that's all.

Please read my response. I agree...book learning he's dumb. What I said is he clearly understands aspects of human nature, and how to manipulate that nature to his own ends. That's clear.

The other part of the overall novels - typical of Card's work - is the not-so-hidden thread of cruelty, particularly to children. That, too, has become more realistic over time, far more than I would have liked.