Post

I've been saying this. if the Very Serious Centrists are getting dogwalked by DSA radicals with almost no money, they have no business claiming to be the most electable ones

David Dayen@ddayen.bsky.social

Incredible that the center-left habitually chides progressives for forgetting the "ancient wisdom" of politics and then watches as they're beaten by the most basic organizing: campaigning in public, finding volunteers, canvassing. www.nytimes.com/2026/08/10/u...

211 reposts1K likes

I’m running for NC senate in central NC. Alongside me are two house candidates. A former mayor who was the youngest ever in the city’s history, a school teacher, and myself a dad of four who works in social work. We’ve knocked thousands of doors and that has made our races competitive.

The simple act of going out and talking to people regardless of party or location means a ton of voters are meeting a candidate in person for the first time. It is eye opening. The effort matters more than the money especially the more local the race gets.

Capital will overwhelmingly back the GOP in 2026. You’d expect Dems to select for cost-efficient candidates who can get solid electoral bang for each buck In other words, managing to overcome a huge funding disparity—rather than relying on one—makes candidates far more suitable to face Republicans

Ducati5@ducati5.bsky.social

This tells a different story: The race drew record breaking spending from AIPAC and corporate special interests, totaling nearly $70 million. El-Sayed was 11 : 1. An average of $95 was spent for every vote against El-Sayed, more than 10 times as much as Abdul’s $9 per vote average.

You realize the difference between winning a primary and winning the general, right? The GOP nominate the lesser electable all the time and it helps the Dem. Why wouldn’t the reverse be true?

My apparently niche take is that good candidates win and bad ones lose and very little of that has to do with policy positions. (Applied here I’m optimistic in MI and skeptical in WI.)

This is a topic that varies district by district. DSA ain’t winning in Texas but Talarico might. There’s isn’t merely one winning recipe here. Be a good candidate that speaks to and represents your constituents.

one of the big stories of 2024 was dems spending a billion dollars on “old-fashioned ground game” + tv ads, while the gop owned digital and won—so this might seem counterintuitive. but a), a midterm primary is not a presidential general, and b) voters still have to buy what you’re selling!

These hacks have been waiting for droves of neverTrump Republicans to vote D for a decade now, and they still have this fantasy. If only they can just get past the pesky Democrat voters, then maybe *this* time...

What if… the DSA radicals winning elections with almost no money ALSO had money! Maybe the money would actually cause more harm than good. I suppose we’ll find out eventually.

Hong has been campaigning all over the state since last winter, and her opponents barely started doing any public campaigning until June. The lieutenant governor was my default, and by May I was honestly unsure if she was actually running, so silent was her campaign.

And of course that was probably in part due to the special circumstances of her campaign not having raised any money, but others like Roys seem to have had the idea that before June was fundraising time, and June-July was campaign season.

(I voted for Roys this morning) Republicans have been practicing the ethic of Always Be Campaigning since the 1990s. Democrats need to learn that campaigning isn’t a necessary chore to be endured, it’s the foundation of democratic politics.