Post

Just a thought: How about we stop shaming the poor for buying things that may not be essential, and start shaming the rich for making a profit off things that are essential.

1.3K reposts5.3K likes

How about we encourage the poor to not buy non-essentials so they can stick it to the rich for making a profit? Encouraging people to be frugal and to make better choices is not shaming. It's helping people to free themselves from the prison of malignant capitalism.

And how about we acknowledge that we are fully dependent on their liquid spending. And that even if they did everything right, there is not enough room to climb the ladder. Demand for better jobs doesn’t create jobs. Jobs aren’t products - but we act like they are. Labor is bought. So screwed up.

Friendly reminder 📌: If you buy cheap, you exploit someone else who cannot defend themselves, and you exploit the planet, which is even less able to defend itself. Both the social and ecological backlash have already started to kick in.

I hate the idea that hard working people don't deserve nice things every now and then because they're poor. Being poor is a HARD, soul crushing existence and we all deserve a little reprieve.

And shaming the rich for competitive yacht purchase while people starve on the streets. And shaming the rich for pissing contest rocket creations while people sleep in the streets. And shaming the rich for buying elections and selling out the country for a chance at more deregulation(monopolization)

If we're going to constantly go at them for their lack of political insight and general stupidity, and we definitely do, why not go the whole hog? The contents of their shopping trolley is so unimportant I can't see why you're even posting about it.

Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed. -Herman Melville

And a good thought it is.. I am coming to realize how much of a negative factor the wealthy are to improving life for the poor and working class they literally ruin everything they get involved in

Every social program that helps the less fortunate is gobbled up by the utilities, food groups, pharmaceutical companies! Their great deceit has been pointing the finger at the poor while large corporations have been the beneficiaries.

No kidding. Subsidized housing is another case in point. The owners can be close to slumlords while getting full market rate because people have nowhere else to go. Afraid of retaliation and too poor to hire an attorney.

I had a Republican coworker who used to say this all the time: "I drove past the homeless shelter and people had cell phones. If they can afford phones, they can afford a place to live." I tried to explain how necessary a cell phone was to a person without a home. She never tried to understand.

How can people get jobs without a permanent address? At the very least they need a constant phone number to be able to apply for a job. It’s infuriating that people judge the unsheltered for having a damn cellphone.

As well as the more people that can participate in the economy, the better the economy and it's opportunities. Sadly that idea is to much for people that want to control all the money.

Sounds really cool and I do share the actual sentiment. But why would anybody do work without compensation? (rich people do not get paid a salary, they make a profit in this simplified view). Is the author exempt because she makes nonessential things , but a wheat farmer has to work for free?

That. And also, we might ask why the rich hoard wealth that they could never spend in their lifetimes while others are without essentials. Homes that sit empty while people are unhoused. How many homes does one need in a morally just society? How many planes? Yachts? Islands?… I could go on 😂😂

When someone reaches $1 billion, we need to give them a medal, shake their hand and say “congratulations, you won at capitalism.” But then take every fucking penny from them after that.

Also, as if the rich don’t buy non-essential things? That’s truly rich indeed. For far too many of the them, the vast majority of what they buy is non essential. For far too many of them, they also don’t add much if any value back into society. I mean if they want to generalize we can go there

Agree, I also think we’re going to have to let go of the “we told you so, pretty soon” or we going to remain in the elitist democratic camp vs. the camp of caring and being for the middle/lower class.

Can we shame billionaires for buying things that are not essential? Like enormous yachts, homes with more rooms than you could even visit in a lifetime, multiple cars and more shoes than there are feet in some countries?

It is time to shame the rich for not paying their fair share of taxes! The rich need to be pay taxes at a progressive rate so the rich pay higher rates than secretaries, firemen and working Americans. Get rid of the loopholes & lower rates for dividends & capital gains!

So much profit is the problem. But then, when there's too much profit, it could and should be taxed, in theory, and money would return to poorer citizens in various ways. But then people, even those relatively poor, won't always vote for candidates or parties wanting to tax profit and wealth...