Post

Welker: "Do you agree with the president's ban [of CNN, MS NOW, and Politico]?" Barrasso: "We all respect and value the freedom of the press; it's in the Constitution…The press has an obligation to report fairly, and the president doesn't see it happening that way."

47 reposts208 likes

I don't fucking care 'if the president doesn't see if happening that way'! It's in the fucking constitution - you can't just ban them because you don't think they're 'playing fairly'!

Barasso: "The press has an obligation to report fairly." Wtf? Election of 1800, Adams vs. Jefferson, 2 guys responsible for founding documents, ran for office during a time when newspapers might actually make up some crap about a politico. The press must not start riots. The rest, fair game!

So? Who gives a flying f@ck how he sees it, Senator. You are either for the 1st Amendment or you are not. If you are not, which basically you are saying, then resign. You are violating your oath.

Whenever I see any of the four Republican senators who are MDs all I can think about is their confirming RFK Jr to lead DHHS. Nothing any of them say about anything has any credibility.

Wouldn't it be cool if just one reporter had the ovaries or balls to remind Republicans how Trumpet used that same media to VILLIFY Obama saying he wasn't a "real American"? All LIES about his birth certificate! The media reports FACTS & #DonaldTheDictatorWannabe calls it fake news. BIG DIFFERENCE.

The majority of Americans that voted wanted for your president twice so FAFO. If you want a different president the order side needs to frame the policies they will push for and spell out in detail how they will benefit the American people. Cut through the white noise and don't go off message

Also, Wyoming is over-represented in the Senate. Don't forget there's only one Congresswoman from Wyoming, but yet two Senators. You could combine Idaho (2), Wyoming, Montana(2), the Dakotas (one apiece) and Nebraska (3) into one state and STILL have fewer Congressman than California (52)...

Imaginary interaction: Welker: "Do you agree with Biden's ban of Fox and Newsmax?" Barrass[h]o[le]: "This is a complete outrage and unconstitutional! I am encouraging my colleagues in the House to bring articles of impeachment!"

TRANSLATION: "I don't realize that 24 months from now I won't be able to retrieve my pathetic lapdog legacy from the annals of history. I'm a fucking pathetic weakling whose grandchildren will know I did this."

It's funny because not only is that not how freedom of the press works, but that is literally the kind of treatment the press is supposed to be guaranteed of being free from under freedom of the press ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

If the press had a constitutional mandate to report fairly, right wing media wouldn't exist, and wouldn't ever have existed. Fox News could rename itself to the Fox Framing Network and it would be more accurate.

Again, this fool folds in an instant. He is willing to erase a fundamental American right in the blink of an eye. This is disgusting and disgraceful and demonstrates how weak and traitorous the goo is.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Kristen Welker has proven herself to be totally incompetent. Did she ask Borasso if Trump was a member of the press when he was banned from X and FB?

So some place in the constitution, presidents can decide if the media, or anyone exercising our right to free speech is being fair. Someone show me that entry in the constitution. Epstein files

Trump "not seeing it that way" doesn't reflect reality. It means he's a very special little boy who is violently allergic to anything that pierces his little narcissist bubble.

This POS knows that there is a HUGE difference getting banned from a private company Twitter and being censored by the US federal government. These Republicans think we are all as dumb as their voters.

Well the president's right. Most of the press bow down and kiss his feet. They'll be the ones to stay. It's only the truth seekers he wants banned because his whole presidency is based on lies he wants repeated. If he wants respect and accolades, he's going to do something worthy of that.

Absolutely shameful. From a US Senator no less. The whole point of freedom of the press is so that one individual can’t decide what is correct or “fair”. And to compare what the president is doing to the work of private businesses to ban individual users of their platform has to be gaslighting.

Allowing a pathological liar to determine what's "fair" doesn't appear to respect or value the First Amendment. So cut the evasive bullshit, senator. You support a despotic grifter's propaganda state.

There are multiple strong rational voices in the House, Jason Crow comes to mind. CNN, MS NOW, and Politico reporters should hold pressers with the emerging Democrat leaders and ignore the whiner.

Barrso posited a totally false equivalence saying in Trump was banned from Twitter and Facebook. Trump is not part of the press so his being banned is NOTHING like banning the press from the White House.

The press has the obligation to report the truth. What Trump doesn’t like is the truth. And the truth is that he is the most corrupt & incompetent President we have ever had.

Facebook and Twitter are not the president of the United States. They can ban anyone they want as they are under no constitutional requirement of freedom of speech. The govt of which the president is the chief officer cannot ban freedom of the press. That’s why that protection exists!

The idea that the press must be ‘fair’ in order to be free is completely contradictory to the entire concept of press freedom. Fairness is a matter of opinion, freedom is not.

Barrasso is an idiot and a traitor to the Constitution. If the POTUS is allowed to block news outlets based on his own opinion of "fair reporting" then WE DON'T HAVE A FREE PRESS!!! Trump and Barrasso are MAGA TRAITORS!!!

Ok. And he may have his own opinion, just like every other citizen of this country. He may not force others to only hear/read his sole opinion. End of story.

BARRASSO: Kris I want to ADDRESS this issue. [WELKER nods] You KNOW I am sensitive to the freedom of the press WELKER: Absolutely BARRASSO: BUT!

Barrasso: "I think the President's decision to replace all news media with wisdom-filled, patriotic statements from Trumpcast Realnews is a just one. He is clearly the greatest leader of any country in all of human history, and therefore any unbiased reporting must reflect that fact at all times."