Post

I, personally, would not go on the record with a reporter to announce I’m in favor of destroying the playground my kid is currently loving because I drive to work once a week (and the road still wouldn’t go there anyway), but everyone lives their lives differently I guess

137 reposts822 likes

Agreed there. But to be honest I wouldn’t be against a slight redesign or adding safety features. Those stump steps & no handrail just seems like a recipe for constant falls. Granted a handrail might not work, as it’s just something else to bounce off of.

I get that, but I’m making more of an aside. I think the playground should remain, just wouldn’t mind a redesign of bits

Back in the sixties there was a lot more dunes, hundreds of feet of sand before you hit the surf....that was the playground. The damning of the Sacramento and other rivers kept the sand from replenishing the beach and erosion took its toll....

this skeet has wildly escaped local containment, so to summarize seven years for those not in San Francisco: this is about closing the new coastal park we voted for two years ago it's the third ballot measure on the issue in 6 years anyway, vote no on G and come volunteer, I promise it's fun

savesunsetdunes.orgVote NO on G - Save Sunset Dunes ParkVote NO on G - Proposition G would demolish Sunset Dunes Park. It would tear out every park feature, from the playground to skate park to hammocks to seating and art. Stop the park closure! Save one o...

One has to wonder what the _Standard_ puts "rather than 19th Avenue" in the narrative voice, making it unclear who's getting the existence of Sunset Boulevard so ridiculously wrong.

Usually bay area residents wait until their kids are gone to screw over everyone else's kids. I applaud this woman for getting ahead of the curve.

"Open" "Closed" none of these terms make sense when cars are involved. The real choice is "I drive car through there" or "I can be there"