David Binnig

David Binnig

@binnig.bsky.social

Portlander. Transportation & housing hobbyist.

1.4K followers1.6K following1.8K posts

Added how often councilors co-sponsor items with each other. One pattern that wasn't at all visible in the straight vote counts is that Koyama Lane is especially likely to co-introduce legislation across factions and to get broad support for her amendments.

David Binnig@binnig.bsky.social

Okay, added amendments to the "agreement" page. Image here is showing "all" votes rather than contested votes on amendments. Only amendments with named attribution are included (e.g. "Kanal 2"), so many amendments (esp. amendments to amendments) are not included. pdxcouncilstats.com/agreement

Okay this is an interesting view: how often councilors voted for items proposed by other councilors. On this measure I think Dan Ryan is kind of uniquely a hard-line factional voter.

This post is unavailable.
View full thread

Okay this is an interesting view: how often councilors voted for items proposed by other councilors. On this measure I think Dan Ryan is kind of uniquely a hard-line factional voter.

This post is unavailable.

By contrast Pirtle-Guiney voted yes at least 75% of the time in contested votes on items introduced by other councilors, across factions. Dunphy, Green, Kanal, and Morillo were all yes at least 50% for items introduced by all other councilors.

N is small for some of these cells, though — Koyama Lane would be similarly high in whatever this agreeableness metric is, but split with most other councilors on one Novick budget item.

David Binnig reposted

i never expected the O to endorsement me, and I’m not surprised they only discussed the headlines they’ve chosen to make about me. but, i’m pissed about how they’ve reduced Tiffany’s contributions. she’s done more than anyone in our races to build a functioning council.

David Binnig reposted

zimmerman has a strategy of casting no votes on stuff he knows is going to pass so he can go on podcasts and talk about how he's fighting for affordability by voting against funding city services and it's quite annoying to me

David Binnig@binnig.bsky.social

Zimmerman is most often in the minority, and most likely to be a minority of one: pdxcouncilstats.com/rankings

Or you can sort by how often each councilor votes with other councilors. Novick is most interesting, with Clark at the top of his agreement list but Zimmerman at the bottom.

Contested votes are more interesting since otherwise there are a lot of low-stakes unanimous votes in the count. This view groups Y/N and N/Y votes so 11/1 and 1/11 are in the same bucket:

David Binnig reposted

“Later, as he sat on his balcony eating the dog, Dr Robert Laing reflected on the unusual events that had taken place within this huge apartment building during the previous three months.” (J.G. Ballard, High-Rise)

The Atlantic@theatlantic.com

A novel’s first line carries enormous weight—in The Atlantic Daily, Atlantic writers and editors share some of their favorite first lines in modern literature. We want to know: What first line of a book has stuck with you?

David Binnig reposted

Replying to @fischer.bsky.social

but it is likely that progressives will break the 25% threshold in every key race, which means a fraction of your vote will go to your lower ranked candidates. and it is not hypothetical that it could end up influencing those races: progressive reallocations helped put zimmerman above arnold in 2024

View full thread

It's totally understandable that people think you shouldn't rank a candidate you don't want in office; the city & county are telling them that. Here's why it's wrong: 1. Ranking a candidate you don't like *can't hurt* a candidate you ranked higher. 2. It can help block a candidate you hate more.

Spendy Criddler@crazydream.bsky.social

Portland’s own website says I shouldn’t rank a candidate that I do not support. www.portland.gov/vote/questio...

View full thread

If you have different preferences you can swap out the names but it’s still true that if there are six or fewer candidates with a non-negligible chance of winning you should rank all of them (optionally excepting your single least favorite), even if you oppose & dislike several of the others.

I'm not sure what the intention is when groups like Portland for All tell people not to rank any of the moderate candidates in D3/4, but the *effect* is that it's telling progressive voters to throw out whatever influence they have over which moderates get elected.

David Binnig@binnig.bsky.social

But if the TKL/Morillo/Leon voters had ranked Novick somewhere in their 4th through 6th ranks, TKL and Morillo still win, but those surplus votes + transferred elimination votes put Novick above 25%, shutting out Torres. (Whether they rank Torres below Novick or not at all is immaterial.)

It's totally understandable that people think you shouldn't rank a candidate you don't want in office; the city & county are telling them that. Here's why it's wrong: 1. Ranking a candidate you don't like *can't hurt* a candidate you ranked higher. 2. It can help block a candidate you hate more.

Spendy Criddler@crazydream.bsky.social

Portland’s own website says I shouldn’t rank a candidate that I do not support. www.portland.gov/vote/questio...

View full thread

But none of these voters ranked choices beyond their top 3, so their ballots are exhausted and thrown out. Now the remaining seat hinges on how Sollitt voters used their ballots. If most of them ranked Torres 2nd (because they wanted change), Sollitt is eliminated and Torres wins the third seat.

But if the TKL/Morillo/Leon voters had ranked Novick somewhere in their 4th through 6th ranks, TKL and Morillo still win, but those surplus votes + transferred elimination votes put Novick above 25%, shutting out Torres. (Whether they rank Torres below Novick or not at all is immaterial.)

It's totally understandable that people think you shouldn't rank a candidate you don't want in office; the city & county are telling them that. Here's why it's wrong: 1. Ranking a candidate you don't like *can't hurt* a candidate you ranked higher. 2. It can help block a candidate you hate more.

Spendy Criddler@crazydream.bsky.social

Portland’s own website says I shouldn’t rank a candidate that I do not support. www.portland.gov/vote/questio...

As a simple example: assume that there's a bloc of D3 voters who like Morillo and TKL, are Leon-curious, and don't like Novick, Torres, or Sollitt, but dislike Torres the most of those 3. Assume they rank only candidates they like, and that other candidates have neglible support.

For convenience, assume that first-choice ranks follow the small-donor elections numbers.* TKL and Morillo win easily with 31% and 29%, then Leon is eliminated. At this point the surplus votes (above 25%) for TKL and Morillo, plus transferred votes from Leon, would be 15% of the vote—

David Binnig reposted

corrupt big developer is mad about neighborhood rezonings that will enable more affordable housing development and more small builders to enter the market. tremendous messaging gift

This post is unavailable.

I don’t think it happens this year but to the extent that factions harden I wonder if we could get a “center squeeze” in Portland’s STV council elections?

I kind of expected a center squeeze in the 2024 mayoral race and then it didn’t happen. (That Wilson would have won any hypothetical head-to-head contest but would be eliminated before the final round as fewer people’s first pick.)

To expand—if you want more progressives on city council you can: • Pump up turnout among latent progressive voters • Sell more people on progressive ideas • Flip previous mod voters through charisma and/or triangulation. You can’t just truncate your preferences harder.

David Binnig@binnig.bsky.social

I guess it’s the season again to start pointing out that “don’t rank” campaigns didn’t work in 2024 and basically can’t work in Portland’s election system.