Dan Levenstein

Dan Levenstein

@dlevenstein.bsky.social

Neuroscientist, in theory. Studying sleep and navigation in 🧠s and 💻s. Wu Tsai Investigator, Assistant Professor of Neuroscience at Yale. An emergent property of a few billion neurons, their interactions with each other and the world over ~1 century.

4.4K followers1.4K following1.5K posts

Took Barb’s cognitive neuroscience class during my masters, when I was considering a switch from biophysics to comp neuro. The grad student discussion section was held at the local pub and always came back to the importance of evolution, development, and large-scale neuroanatomy of not-just-cortex…

The Transmitter @thetransmitter.bsky.social

Barbara Finlay, who died on 12 September, championed the idea that developmental constraints dictate how evolution sculpts brains, which she used to model the timing of hundreds of events and align them across mammalian species. By @callimcflurry.bsky.social www.thetransmitter.org/evolution/re...

Dan Levenstein reposted

Replying to @tyrellturing.bsky.social

4/7) It's only by tying the emergence of that manifold to the architecture, loss, learning rule, and *data/world* that the network was shaped by that we arrive at any additional knowledge gained by observing the manifold.

I've been trying to figure out how to explain this tendency of LLM writing to use terms it hasn't introduced as if you already know what it's talking about, but it's a dead giveaway that's a little more subtle than "delve" or em-dashes.

Dan Levenstein reposted

I had a feeling recently that seems to be corroborated by chats with colleagues, so I decided to share it here. A lot of systems neuroscientists driven by algorithmic-level questions are going through what looks and feels like a research depression. 🧵 (1/n) 🧠📈 #NeuroAI

Dan Levenstein reposted

this is an extremely cool and useful information visualization

Jaz@jaz.sh

Okay so I've built a new Atlas, this time it lets you explore the conversations on Bluesky over the past 7 days graphically. It should update every ~6 hours and help you navigate the information environment that exists on here. I've learned a LOT about what people do here today... atlas.jazco.dev

Dan Levenstein reposted

I kinda get why people hate on fussy philosophical stuff, but on the other hand don't you think we live in a time where it'd be especially helpful to have rigorous conversations about things like personhood, meaning in life, the point of art, the point of pure mathematics, & operationalizing ethics?

Dan Levenstein reposted

There’s a Ted Chiang story where AI has a parallel AI-only scientific literature. In that case, AI was doing all the real science and humans were left to pick up the scraps and try to understand what they could… Not sure if I’d prefer that or slopfest.

Christophe 🔬 Leterrier@christlet.bsky.social

Hallelujah! Papers written by an AI and reviewed by an AI can finally be read by an AI, fulfilling the prophecy of the Great AI Circlejerk

Dan Levenstein reposted

I’ve been thinking… now that AI is taking on groundbreaking, award-winning problems across science, what are those equivalent problems in #neuroscience? What would one of these models actually have to do to leave us all in awe? 🧠🤖

Dan Levenstein reposted

If there are any PhD hopefuls on here, I wanted to share a few thoughts on your timeline for the upcoming admissions cycle, with apps due starting mid-November. What should you be doing right now? ✔️ Generating a list of schools ✔️ Reaching out to possible recommenders 🧵!

Dan Levenstein reposted

The superposition of these two studies — both incredible — reflect a snapshot of "one big thing" systems neuroscience has yet to resolve. In mice: 1. Task-related signals are everywhere. 2. Absent large swaths of "everywhere," suprisingly sophisticated learning & behavior remains.

Really enjoyed this conversation with @braininspired.bsky.social!

The Transmitter @thetransmitter.bsky.social

In this episode of @braininspired.bsky.social, @dlevenstein.bsky.social explains how internally generated brain activity during sleep shapes our cognition, and why NeuroAI is such a powerful approach to understanding our brains. #neuroskyence www.thetransmitter.org/brain-inspir...

Yale Neuroscience is hiring another computational neuroscience position this year! Please share with anyone who might be interested, and feel free to reach out if you have any questions about the position, or growing neuro-AI community at Yale/WTI!

Yale Neuroscience@yaleneuro.bsky.social

The Department of Neuroscience at Yale is hiring faculty members. We have 2 searches: one general (deadline Oct 15), one focused on computational neuroscience (deadline Nov 30). Apply! apply.interfolio.com/190736 & apply.interfolio.com/190740

Dan Levenstein reposted

Replying to @cianodonnell.bsky.social

We were actually discussing this at a workshop earlier this year. In particular: The dynamics of BTSP actually seem to potentially be counter to a gradient descent mechanism, and more in line with hashing.

Interesting to think of how to pay for the cost of algorithms that work for you and not for advertisers.

For You Feed@foryou.club

Hi For You users! Please help me figure out what a 🔋Turbo version of For You would be worth to you. It works twice as hard to find the best posts. Answer one question in cups of coffee. Zero cups is a real answer. You get a month of 🔋Turbo either way: foryou.club/turbo

Dan Levenstein reposted

I gave a talk in our ISRC CN3 summer school yesterday on computational modelling of learning and memory, at the end I threw in a list of what I consider the big open questions in the the theory of learning in neural circuits. What did I miss??

Dan Levenstein reposted

If you’re interested to do an interdisciplinary co-mentored, field transition, or open ended theory/computation postdoc at WTI, please get in touch!

Applications are open for WTI Postdoctoral Fellowships! Calling experimental, computational + theoretical researchers working across disciplines to explore human cognition. Apply: apply.interfolio.com/189775 Learn more: wti.yale.edu/initiatives/postdoctoral #KnowTogether #ScienceAtYale

If you’re interested to do an interdisciplinary co-mentored, field transition, or open ended theory/computation postdoc at WTI, please get in touch!

Applications are open for WTI Postdoctoral Fellowships! Calling experimental, computational + theoretical researchers working across disciplines to explore human cognition. Apply: apply.interfolio.com/189775 Learn more: wti.yale.edu/initiatives/postdoctoral #KnowTogether #ScienceAtYale

Postdocs - come talk at Yale!

Yale Neuroscience@yaleneuro.bsky.social

📢 Calling all senior neuro postdocs: SYNAPSES brings postdocs from around the world to Yale to share their work during an in-person symposium on October 22, 2026. Apply today! Deadline Sept 3. medicine.yale.edu/neuroscience...

Dan Levenstein reposted

I think the difficulty of understanding feedback loops underlies many big debates in science: Origin of life: "genes first" vs "metabolism first" (neither, it's a feedback loop) Development: "nature vs nurture" (neither, it's a feedback loop) Neuroscience: "brain vs behaviour" (you guessed it!)

This is why I’ve gone from “never want to touch a spiking network again” to “excited to do the kinds of things I always wanted to do with spiking networks” in the span of 5 years.

Dan Goodman@neural-reckoning.org

I just gave a short tutorial on what is a spiking neural network and how to train one. From zero to a trained network in one hour. Slides and code you can run in Colab at this repo: github.com/neural-recko... 🤖🧠🧪

They’re Made out of Meat

Dan Goodman@neural-reckoning.org

Is the brain a computer solved in 4 posts so that we never have to talk about this again (please please please). 1. It's not the same physically as a computer - it's made of meat. Hopefully this one at least is uncontroversial.

Dan Levenstein reposted

Replying to @neural-reckoning.org

So asking "is the brain a computer" is not helpful. Symbolic computation is sometimes a useful way of thinking about a brain feature, and sometimes not. And that's it. We really can stop talking about it now. I'm going to regret this. I know it.

A good experiment-theory collaboration takes _________. Wrong answers only.

Marcus Ghosh@marcusghosh.bsky.social

How can we build better experiment-theory collaborations in neuroscience? We're hosting a series of 6 in-person, interactive workshops to discuss this. Come along! www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/understand...

Dan Levenstein reposted

(apart from the important point that if we let AI do all our thinking, we are doomed) generally speaking this is why I have come to view presentations and paper writing as *doing science*, just as much as lab work or running computer simulations or whatever. Communication and discussion are central

Cian O'Donnell@cianodonnell.bsky.social

During my postdoc I was trying to move to a new area, my supervisor said: you have to go to a conference, it's the only way to learn what they are thinking and what the key questions are. He was completely right. Science is a collective and social human pursuit, not a bunch of pdfs online

Dan Levenstein reposted