Blake Richards

Blake Richards

@tyrellturing.bsky.social

Researcher at Google and CIFAR Fellow, working on the intersection of machine learning and neuroscience in Montréal (academic affiliations: @mcgill.ca and @mila-quebec.bsky.social).

12K followers3.3K following3.4K posts

One of the key factors for the rise of MAGA, IMO, was a deep resentment towards educated urbanites amongst many rural and suburban voters, fuelled by a strong feeling of being judged by them. The Cheesecake Factory thing is just the Republicans trying to tap into that sense of being judged again.

This post is unavailable.

Blake Richards reposted

I'm happy to share my first contribution to The Transmitter. From its inception, AI has borrowed ideas and concepts from the brain's operations and mechanisms. The two field have a lot to gain from each other and we should work to make the bridge wider and stronger.

The Transmitter @thetransmitter.bsky.social

A citation analysis reveals that the connection between the two fields is real and gaining momentum. But it’s also narrow and tool-heavy; we need to find ways to widen it, writes @rcfduarte.bsky.social. @cnc-uc.bsky.social #neuroskyence www.thetransmitter.org/computationa...

Blake Richards reposted

Super excited about this work, led by @haoliu4391.bsky.social and @s-michelmann.bsky.social. Also grateful for the many insightful conversations in which Sebastian gradually convinced me that memory encoding requires retrieval—leveraging existing semantic knowledge to regenerate the experience.

Sebastian Michelmann@s-michelmann.bsky.social

1/ Our brains probably don’t store a new copy of “red” when we encounter something red. Yet we can reinstate distinct memories of red objects. How do we reuse what we already know when encoding memories? Excited to share new work led by @haoliu4391.bsky.social, with @marcelomattar.bsky.social 🧠🧵

Blake Richards reposted

Blake Richards reposted

For those who can’t join us in person tonight, the talk will be livestreamed on @longnow.org's YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPx_...

Blaise Agüera y Arcas@blaiseaguera.bsky.social

Friends in San Francisco: Join me at @longnow.org on October 22 for a conversation on interdependence with @baratunde.com. We'll explore cooperation as the core governing principle of nature and synthetic minds, why intelligence is inherently collective, and what this means for our shared future.

Blake Richards reposted

One reason I'm so worried and often pessimistic about the recovery of US science after Trump is dead is that restoring institutional credibility that was destroyed by govt action is one thing (and not guaranteed to succeed)...but the credibility that was willingly surrendered is gone forever.

Emmet Fraizer@woolsox.bsky.social

Last summer, Scientific American's owners were stalking the site, making sure it wasn't being too critical of Trump. This summer, the magazine was sold and gutted. I wrote about it for The Nation www.thenation.com/article/soci...

Blake Richards reposted

Blake Richards reposted

Blake Richards reposted

Using AI to write the proposal for a grant: heinous, what are you doing, writing is thinking Using AI to populate a weird excel sheet of project timelines in some pseudo-serious format mandated by the grant agency: i love you, liberation technology

Blake Richards reposted

Being anti-AI coding in games makes zero sense. With AI you can quickly make amazing, customized tools and engine code for your team that were cost prohibitive to make before, and these tools empower real artists, designers and programmers to make better games.

Blake Richards reposted

My main concern here is that what counts as “intelligence” is radically broad, covering “…doing, or performing functions” Any capacity measurable by cog sci is thereby written off, however closely it instantiates properties associated with human consciousness AI consciousness is ruled out by fiat

Anil Seth@anilseth.bsky.social

1/2 Three reasons why AI is not conscious - and perhaps never will be. New in @nature.com with Ned Block @neddo.bsky.social and Giulio Tononi www.nature.com/articles/d41...

Blake Richards reposted

Making myself angry for no reason at all remembering the American transit planner that went to Amsterdam and was appalled at how little stakeholder engagement they did in favor of actually building shit.

Blake Richards reposted

Konrad’s framing of quietism in neuro is the exact therapy for what I described in this thread: bsky.app/profile/shah...

Konrad Kording@kordinglab.bsky.social

Why We Systems Neuroscientists Should (Usually) Be Quietists: The Philosophical Logic of NeuroAI -- response to David Barack kording.substack.com/p/why-we-sys...

Blake Richards reposted

I had a feeling recently that seems to be corroborated by chats with colleagues, so I decided to share it here. A lot of systems neuroscientists driven by algorithmic-level questions are going through what looks and feels like a research depression. 🧵 (1/n) 🧠📈 #NeuroAI

Blake Richards reposted

Friends in San Francisco: Join me at @longnow.org on October 22 for a conversation on interdependence with @baratunde.com. We'll explore cooperation as the core governing principle of nature and synthetic minds, why intelligence is inherently collective, and what this means for our shared future.

How do we co-create a future with tech that actually serves humanity and the planet? On Oct 22, join @baratunde.com and @blaiseaguera.bsky.social for "On Interdependence": a 10,000-year look at civic action, Indigenous wisdom, and human survival. Tickets: longnow.org/talks/02026-...

1/6) Great paper title! But, I actually disagree with some of the main points in this paper. And I think the authors are not accurately representing what "The Science" (TM) says about this topic.

Russ Poldrack@russpoldrack.org

I just came across this paper by Cesario et al. that has one of the greatest titles ever: " journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

View full thread

5/6) In sum: 'Yes' to ditching the idea of humans as some final destination in the grand path towards more "advanced" species. 'No' to the claim that brain size and complexity are somehow unrelated to behavioural complexity and flexibility.

6/6) Put another way: no, your brain is not a lizard inside of an onion. But if natural selection kept adding adding to your ancestor's existing neural circuits, that's almost assuredly because those additions helped make you a more flexible, intelligent actor in the world.

1/6) Great paper title! But, I actually disagree with some of the main points in this paper. And I think the authors are not accurately representing what "The Science" (TM) says about this topic.

Russ Poldrack@russpoldrack.org

I just came across this paper by Cesario et al. that has one of the greatest titles ever: " journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

View full thread

3/6) But they veer off path when they say "[It is not true] that adding complex neural structures allows increased behavioral complexity—that structural complexity endows functional complexity. The idea that larger brains can be equated with increased behavioral complexity is highly debatable." 🤔

4/6) This is not as debatable as they are suggesting. First, there is a very clear correlation between brain size/complexity and behavioural complexity. Second, there must be a reason that larger, more complex brains evolved multiple times in multiple branches, despite their clear energetic costs.

1/6) Great paper title! But, I actually disagree with some of the main points in this paper. And I think the authors are not accurately representing what "The Science" (TM) says about this topic.

Russ Poldrack@russpoldrack.org

I just came across this paper by Cesario et al. that has one of the greatest titles ever: " journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

2/6) What they get right is the point that evolution is often misconstrued as some ladder of progress, whereas the "...the correct view of evolution is that animals radiated from common ancestors... complex nervous systems and sophisticated cognitive abilities evolved independently many times." 👍

Blake Richards reposted

My journey from the eminently decipherable retina to the entangled mess that is the mammalian motor system. No turning back now. !https://www.thetransmitter.org/methods/what-to-do-when-traditional-mechanistic-approaches-no-longer-work/

thetransmitter.orgWhen traditional mechanistic approaches no longer workMany complex behaviors have resisted mechanistic explanations. Deciphering them requires new approaches—and maybe a new concept of “understanding.”

1/7) I fully agree with @kordinglab.bsky.social's response to @dlbarack.bsky.social. The motivation behind the "Strong NeuroAI" approach that myself and others have adopted is not simply an a priori philosophical position, but an empirical observation:

Konrad Kording@kordinglab.bsky.social

Why We Systems Neuroscientists Should (Usually) Be Quietists: The Philosophical Logic of NeuroAI -- response to David Barack kording.substack.com/p/why-we-sys...

View full thread

7/7) In general, I suspect we will ever fully comprehend any large systems in biology, except in the light of natural selection. And this would be a more general articulation of the "Strong" position.

1/7) I fully agree with @kordinglab.bsky.social's response to @dlbarack.bsky.social. The motivation behind the "Strong NeuroAI" approach that myself and others have adopted is not simply an a priori philosophical position, but an empirical observation:

Konrad Kording@kordinglab.bsky.social

Why We Systems Neuroscientists Should (Usually) Be Quietists: The Philosophical Logic of NeuroAI -- response to David Barack kording.substack.com/p/why-we-sys...

View full thread

5/7) I believe that the "Weak NeuroAI" program that @dlbarack.bsky.social advocates for (which I support), ends up being a form of the "Strong" program once we actually try to contend with *understanding* the neural networks that serve as a source of hypotheses and as a digital experimental testbed.

1/7) I fully agree with @kordinglab.bsky.social's response to @dlbarack.bsky.social. The motivation behind the "Strong NeuroAI" approach that myself and others have adopted is not simply an a priori philosophical position, but an empirical observation:

Konrad Kording@kordinglab.bsky.social

Why We Systems Neuroscientists Should (Usually) Be Quietists: The Philosophical Logic of NeuroAI -- response to David Barack kording.substack.com/p/why-we-sys...

View full thread

3/7) If we take the manifold example, I would argue this actually fits fully within the framework we advocated for. Because, simply observing a neural manifold tells us very little about how the brain is computing something or why.

4/7) It's only by tying the emergence of that manifold to the architecture, loss, learning rule, and *data/world* that the network was shaped by that we arrive at any additional knowledge gained by observing the manifold.

1/7) I fully agree with @kordinglab.bsky.social's response to @dlbarack.bsky.social. The motivation behind the "Strong NeuroAI" approach that myself and others have adopted is not simply an a priori philosophical position, but an empirical observation:

Konrad Kording@kordinglab.bsky.social

Why We Systems Neuroscientists Should (Usually) Be Quietists: The Philosophical Logic of NeuroAI -- response to David Barack kording.substack.com/p/why-we-sys...

2/7) An observation of the failure of neuroscience to generate human comprehensible explanations for large neural circuits (e.g. in the forebrain of vertebrates). @dlbarack.bsky.social's positive examples of advances in neuroscience, such as manifolds and neurotech, do not counter this, IMO.

Blake Richards reposted

(1/2) I’m starting a NeuroAI and comp neuro lab at the University of Toronto! How do brains and AI learn from ongoing experience? How do they connect delayed outcomes to past actions, adapt to change, and retain what matters? Recruiting funded PhD students for Fall 2027. Links in the reply 👇

Blake Richards reposted

Reminder - the open access deal on this BBS collection is only for one more week (until 23/10/26) - don't miss your chance to get hold of the full pdf 👇🏽

Anil Seth@anilseth.bsky.social

1/2 🎇 Good news! 🎇 The kind people at Behavioral and Brain Science have made the new collection on "Conscious AI and biological naturalism" #OpenAccess for a limited time: target article, all 50 commentaries, & my response. Go to the link and click 'save pdf': doi.org/10.1017/S014.... Do share!

Blake Richards reposted

Mila’s annual supervision request process is open for MSc and PhD applications for Fall 2027 admission. While I won’t be taking on new students for supervision this cycle, I encourage you to apply to join Mila’s brilliant deep learning research community.

mila.quebecSupervision Requests | MilaEach student at Mila is supervised by one of our affiliated professors. Applicants are selected through the supervision request process.

Blake Richards reposted

Such a great question and nice to see a positive answer

Royal Society Publishing@royalsocietypublishing.org

Do animals remember after months of hibernation? In new research from #BiologyLetters, Columbian ground squirrels retained spatial memories after nine months of hibernation, outperforming inexperienced squirrels by 41–98% in their first maze trial after waking doi.org/10.1098/rsbl... #Cognition

Blake Richards reposted

Our paper is out in Nature, congrats to Qiyu, An et al! By stimulating ~20 motor cortex neurons carefully selected based on their activity, we could induce learned population activity and, sometimes, the movement itself, depending on the brain's state. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

nature.comTargeted stimulation of motor cortex ensembles drives learned movements - NatureOptogenetic stimulation of motor-cortex neuron ensembles shows that precisely timed activity in the primary motor cortex can generate learned neural patterns and movements, demonstrating an active rol...

Blake Richards reposted

Almost four years ago, An and I were just starting to prepare this manuscript when tragedy struck. Since then, Qiyu and the team have worked extremely hard to bring this study to light. I could not be more proud of them.

Takaki Komiyama @takakikomiyama.bsky.social

Our paper is out in Nature, congrats to Qiyu, An et al! By stimulating ~20 motor cortex neurons carefully selected based on their activity, we could induce learned population activity and, sometimes, the movement itself, depending on the brain's state. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Blake Richards reposted

Over 400 researchers and I have signed this open letter calling for the AI and security communities to come together to improve alignment and containment approaches in order to protect our critical infrastructure and digital systems. ai-security-letter.org

Our paper on exponentiated gradient (EG) learning is now out at Neuron! www.cell.com/neuron/fullt... We show that EG naturally respects Dale's law and produces networks that are a better phenomenlogical fit to biological networks. Congrats to @repromancer.bsky.social for getting this out! 🧠📈 🧪

cell.comExponentiated gradient learning yields brain-like synaptic distributionsCornford et al. show that exponentiated gradient (EG) learning, which updates synapses multiplicatively, matches gradient descent on cognitive tasks while respecting Dale’s law and producing brain-lik...