Jeff Lewis

Jeff Lewis

@lewislab.bsky.social

Interested in understanding how organisms sense and respond to stressful environments, and why some individuals are more sensitive or more resilient. he/his

963 followers479 following852 posts

Jeff Lewis reposted

Excited to share our preprint! “Genome-scale base editing reveals the functional effects of variants in yeast” Using high-throughput base editing, we measured the growth effects of 308,461 variants, identifying 18,009 with significant effects. #Genomics #CRISPR 1/8 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

biorxiv.orgGenome-scale base editing reveals the functional effects of variants in yeastGenome sequencing has catalogued vast genetic diversity, but the functional consequences of most variants remain unknown. Here, we used genome-scale CRISPR base editing to measure the growth effects o...

Jeff Lewis reposted

1/ There are a ton of cool papers coming out on evolutionary transitions in individuality right now! Here are five recent ones I've really enjoyed, spanning Snowball Earth, volvocine algae, plasmids that fuse into a new individual, the relatives of animals, and... water kefir

Jeff Lewis reposted

1/ How do cells divide when they're stuck in something squishy? Most of what we know about the cell cycle comes from yeast in liquid or on flat plates, but in nature they live in dough, mucus, soil and tissue. This new paper asks what that does to division. Love this one!

Jeff Lewis reposted

There seems to be a bigger mystery- MYF appears to have dropped for FY2026 overall at NIH but number of new/competitive renewal have not come back to pre 2025 levels- is there an explanation? The MYF reduction is spotty at institute level @maxkozlov.bsky.social @grantwitness.org

Craig Kaplan@triggerloop.bsky.social

Was pointed to this chart at @grantwitness.org grantwitness.org/nih/analyses... does anyone know how NCI avoided massive MYF this year but still fewer grants?

Jeff Lewis reposted

One of my favorite papers from our lab. Not only does it show heterogeneity is important in development, but it also points to division of labor: clones divvy up tasks in the organism based on their relative ability to perform well at a given fate! I like to think of it as "embryo economics".

Alfonso Martinez Arias@amartinezarias.bsky.social

..and have a look at the highly related paper from @arjunraj.bsky.social biorxiv.org/content/10.1... with complementary experiments that reinforce the point and reveal multicellular #memory@arjunraj.bsky.social

Jeff Lewis reposted

Replying to @markhisted.org

This is why “presidential priorities” should be greatly curtailed. No, the White House should not get to decide the direction of US science. We should go back to the longstanding method of setting science priories before 2025: legislation, based on open debate in the sci community and public.

Jeff Lewis reposted

Correct. Vought and Bhattacharya want to do to NIH what they have gotten further with at NSF- turn it into a slush fund for their political preferences. But peer review is popular, and it is required by law. So they are slowly chipping away at peer review process in an effort to break it.

This post is unavailable.

Jeff Lewis reposted

Editors and reviewers, just like authors, are quite busy and are trying their best. Being rude with us editors helps no one. Being understanding, on the other hand, goes a long way. Thank you for your patience.

Jeff Lewis reposted

“This guy’s cursing me up. I better reconsider my decision”, said no editor ever…

Alejandro Montenegro@aemonten.bsky.social

Editors and reviewers, just like authors, are quite busy and are trying their best. Being rude with us editors helps no one. Being understanding, on the other hand, goes a long way. Thank you for your patience.

Jeff Lewis reposted

“no review panels are scheduled, although about 600 proposals are still pending with SBE” So 600 teams of scientists got preliminary data, did analyses, wrote up proposals, got budgets approved, etc, based on NSF saying there were funds in this area. And now their work is just sitting there

Science Magazine@science.org

Exclusive: In March, the White House’s budget request for fiscal year 2027 called for eliminating NSF’s Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences. Whether Congress will approve the request is unclear, but NSF is not waiting. Learn more: https://scim.ag/4hC7bes

Jeff Lewis reposted

Great point made on the other site. The OpenAI math results can't even be cited. Deepmind has kept a tradition of publishing their results but OpenAI and Anthropic have been reporting these as repos and press releases.

Jeff Lewis reposted

Umm wow. Michael Lewis’s new book says what about NIH??? “He was terrified," said Brought. "He'd never been close to power. He'd never even worked with someone who had been so close to power… He was there because he’d follow orders.”

Nate Brought@usfreepressspain.bsky.social

So, the guy who wrote The Blind Side released a new book today, Blockers: Rebels In The Deep State, and I'm quoted at least once... 🤣😂 Glad he quoted the story about how I called Matt Memoli a bitch to his face...

Jeff Lewis reposted

While book chapters are frequently a bear to write, it’s always thrilling to get a physical object at the end. Thanks to my coauthors Chris and Barbara! We got the intro to yeast chapters for this nice volume from MBAA.

At some level, I empathize with the idea that the amount of time spent on these is not necessarily inversely proportional to how much folks care or are interested in the lab. But the generic template, the 'telling, not showing,' and the circular statements all make it impossible to stand out.

Ran Blekhman@blekhman.bsky.social

My inbox is being flooded with fully AI-generated emails from prospective students. I tried to work out why I can't bring myself to read them, and ended up with some thoughts and advice for writing cold emails in the age of AI. My new post: blekhman.substack.com/p/why-i-am-n...

Jeff Lewis reposted

Ran is cooking with: ‘the only data point I have about this candidate is this: “they had an important task that could determine the rest of their career, but it required a little effort and personal reflection, so they used AI to complete it.”’

Ran Blekhman@blekhman.bsky.social

My inbox is being flooded with fully AI-generated emails from prospective students. I tried to work out why I can't bring myself to read them, and ended up with some thoughts and advice for writing cold emails in the age of AI. My new post: blekhman.substack.com/p/why-i-am-n...

Jeff Lewis reposted

We generated chromosome scale assemblies of house flies with different Y chromosomes. You won't believe what happened next!

bioRxiv Genomics@biorxiv-genomic.bsky.social

X-Y divergence of house fly (Musca domestica) proto-sex chromosomes follows distinct evolutionary trajectories despite residing in the same genome https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.26.754726v1

So, I've been thinking about the Claude RT preprint/press release. I'm not exactly sure what to think yet without more information. If this really was novel hypothesis generation via large-scale unbiased genome analysis, I think that's fairly impressive, even if premature without follow-up. But,

View full thread

I do think that AI has a ton of power to generate hypotheses at a much faster pace than was previously possible, much like genomics did 20 years ago (that feels crazy to type). I remember folks (myself included) thinking genomics was somewhat overhyped, and it was for some things, but not others.

All of this is to say that maybe this will be a false start for AI hypothesis generation, but I do think it will be similarly disruptive as genomics (where it also seems from my perspective to hold the most promise).

So, I've been thinking about the Claude RT preprint/press release. I'm not exactly sure what to think yet without more information. If this really was novel hypothesis generation via large-scale unbiased genome analysis, I think that's fairly impressive, even if premature without follow-up. But,

if this was biased by knowing where to look via training data, it’s suddenly both less impressive and raises questions about AI ‘scooping’ and IP theft. With lots of labs looking at different things, especially in this space, it could just be a coincidence that a Claude user was working on this.

Claude identified other possible leads to follow, and this one happened to win out in head-to-head competitions. Were the 'losers' also enriched for Claude users working on them? Ideally, transparent forensic analysis of how Claude code identified these targets would help clarify.

Jeff Lewis reposted

Replying to @carlbergstrom.com

The RT was annotated in the sequence previously for sure, but what was discovered was the associated clustered repeats that are expressed and appear to associate with the RT, i.e a potential anti-viral system of unknown function but potentially programmable in some way

Jeff Lewis reposted

Science peeps: Looks like SciENcv updated the digital certificate used to sign Biosketch and Current & Pending documents without notification. The old certificate expires Saturday, September 26, 2026. SciENcv docs before that date may fail validation in eRA Commons delaying or blocking submission.

Jeff Lewis reposted

How to destroy strong working relationships, camaraderie and collaboration among staff: Create a system that evaluates staff in comparison to one another rather than based on how well they do their jobs. www.fedweek.com/fedweek/opm-...

fedweek.comOPM Sets Cap on Top Two Ratings Levels of 40 Percent; Not a "Target"OPM has set a cap of 40 percent for the top two ratings levels combined in performance evaluations for the large majority of employees under the GS system

Jeff Lewis reposted

Some random thoughts: Good science doesn't always need disruptors. Often, it needs load-bearing walls. You can't pivot away from a failed multi-year experiment or "iterate" your way out of a mentee's PhD. Science needs stable foundations, not churn. Don't break the people building on top of it.

Respectfully, raw quantity has always been a poor proxy for scholarship quality. We all know examples of great scientists who publish a small number of large papers and others who publish many more strong, concise papers. I've been beating this drum for evaluative purposes for a long while.

Ran Blekhman@blekhman.bsky.social

We have to stop using "paper count" as a useful scientific metric. More writing output no longer means more knowledge gained www.washingtonpost.com/education/20...

Jeff Lewis reposted

Ran is correct about this IMO…. There’s use and there’s abuse and there’s laziness with regard to AI and academia. And there’s no one size all answer that works for everything. I do disagree with the footnote but acknowledge old Twitter has been better for science discussions.

Ran Blekhman@blekhman.bsky.social

The AI Discourse in Academia is Toxic. It Doesn’t have to be. My new post: blekhman.substack.com/p/the-ai-dis...

Jeff Lewis reposted

Okay, so, Nobel Prize for whomever figures out how to run this horrifying experiment in reverse, where penicillium mold and its cousins are forced to come up with increasingly effective antiobiotics.

Michael Baym@baym.lol

Ten years ago Tami, Roy, and I released a movie we made of antibiotic resistance evolving in real time. I thought maybe a couple thousand people tops would see it. I couldn't have imagined it would be seen millions of times, and be taught from middle school through the graduate level worldwide

Jeff Lewis reposted

The Das lab has 1-2 open postdoctoral positions. Our lab investigates the fundamentals of cell-cycle-dependent cell polarity. Boston College has fantastic resources, including a cutting-edge imaging facility with state-of-the-art microscopes. Please apply here: bc.csod.com/ux/ats/caree...