lsfinn

lsfinn

@lsfinn.bsky.social

A place for random thoughts motivated by random things I read, here and elsewhere. To the extent they are reactions I suppose that make me a reactionary.

89 followers27 following535 posts

www.theguardian.com/commentisfre... Is there >any< sense in which one can call "a mistake" an entirely defensible judgement call made by a professional in full knowledge of the available facts at the time? Only if your're a journalist who thinks both-siding is ok for me but not for thee.

theguardian.comDr Fauci made mistakes. But his persecution is a travesty | Margaret SullivanIt’s easy to second-guess decisions made during the pandemic. That doesn’t justify the Republicans’ politicized response

Before retiring I was a university professor. With the rise of internet, and then internet click-bait, there came journal articles whose title was a provocative question that flew in the face of intuition. There was never any reason to read these because, invariably, the answer was "no."

lsfinn reposted

Replying to @anthonymkreis.bsky.social

You can’t do rushed, sloppy, and inaccurate historical work to change legal rules we all live under and not be treated as a player in the president’s political game. If a historian did that, they’d be called a hack, and not taken seriously thereafter. Why should the bar for law profs be lower?

lsfinn reposted

This! (Both grafs!)

Kevin M. Kruse@kevinmkruse.bsky.social

Right, simply entertaining this challenge as if it's remotely legitimate is already discrediting. If there's a single vote to end birthright citizenship, we need to take this Supreme Court apart with sledgehammers and start over.

View full thread

This is not to claim that a failure to understand or appreciate the limits of ones own training, and that there might be other disciplines whose sensible practice requires specialized knowledge and training, is limited to or especially prominent among lawyers.

All that I can really say is that, among those who wrote - not with questions about science, but with assertions and the demand that these be taken seriously - almost all of those who chose to claim a privilege based on an academic credential were of two professions, one of which were lawyers.

"It is now de rigueur for federal judges to “do history” via originialsm or textualism. But the craft of history involves years of reading and immersing oneself in the secondary and primary literature, which a law degree doesn’t train for and the haste of writing an opinion does not allow."

As a research scientist & faculty member in the sciences I received many letters & emails espousing nonsensical "theories." Most were written by members of two professions, who proudly asserted their professional training as proof of the seriousness their "research." Lawyers were one of these.

The draft obligates the US to provide $300b (for the reconstruction of Iran), not sourced from frozen Iranian assets. Yet, the agreement is to be approved by a "binding" resolution of the UN Security Council. Where does the US Senate's Treaty Power come in to play? www.wsj.com/world/middle...

wsj.comAn Annotated Analysis of a U.S. Draft of the Iran DealThe Wall Street Journal reviewed a copy of the draft document. Read the text in full, alongside the Journal’s analysis.

And, how can the Congressional "power of the purse" be subverted in this way? Seems like a lot of BS here, which even the Congressional Rs won't be willing eat.

“One thing I find intensely annoying is when pundits blithely assert things about the world that are obviously false.” Amen.

Philip Bump@pbump.com

One thing I find intensely annoying is when pundits blithely assert things about the world that are obviously false. Bush was below 50% way before Katrina! He barely won reelection! Where on the chart do you think Katrina happened?

lsfinn reposted

lsfinn reposted

With top attys like @nealkatyal.bsky.social now using AI to prep for oral arguments, I had a question. Is Anthropic's Claude conflicted out of prepping DOJ attys for the upcoming DC Circuit argument in Anthropic v US Dept of War? And is DOJ conflicted out of asking it to?

lsfinn reposted

“I picked up the guitar last year, and after endless hours of private lessons and online tutorials, I’ve now learned enough to realize that I have no idea what I’m doing with this instrument,” said the 45-year-old content strategist

theonion.comMan Finally Good Enough At New Hobby To Understand How Bad He Is At ItST. LOUIS—Voicing frustration as he discussed his lack of even the most rudimentary skills, local man Henry Right told reporters Monday that he had finally gotten good enough at his new hobby to under...

[Stay with me ...] "...when a candidate for public office faces the voters he does not face men of sense; he faces a mob of men whose chief distinguishing mark is the fact that they are quite incapable of weighing ideas, or even of comprehending any save the most elemental-

View full thread

We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron." H. L. Mencken

Lest you think of Mencken as a hero, beware that he was virulently anti-semitic and racist, and strongly sympathized with the Nazis. Read him with caution.

[Stay with me ...] "...when a candidate for public office faces the voters he does not face men of sense; he faces a mob of men whose chief distinguishing mark is the fact that they are quite incapable of weighing ideas, or even of comprehending any save the most elemental-

-men whose whole thinking is done in terms of emotion, and whose dominant emotion is dread of what they cannot understand. So confronted, the candidate must either bark with the pack or be lost. All the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre-

-the man who can most adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum. The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people.

This! (Both grafs!)

Kevin M. Kruse@kevinmkruse.bsky.social

Right, simply entertaining this challenge as if it's remotely legitimate is already discrediting. If there's a single vote to end birthright citizenship, we need to take this Supreme Court apart with sledgehammers and start over.

lsfinn reposted

The Supreme Court's "conversion therapy" decision today is indefensible on its own terms. A ton of medical regulations restrict speech on the basis of "viewpoint." Nobody thinks they're unconstitutional. This court just subjects pro-LGBTQ protections to special hostility. slate.com/news-and-pol...

lsfinn reposted

Iran has elections, but to its great shame, it has an unaccountable council of ayatollahs that overrules the elected representatives. Here’s why we’re nullifying the Voting Rights Act. by John Roberts

lsfinn reposted

One thing that AI evangelists seem to assume, particularly legal AI evangelists assume, is that the thinking and analysis is quick, and the writing is just tedious busywork that slows us down. But the writing IS the thinking and analysis. You work out the thinking and analysis by writing it down.