Banks just giving more & more money to AI companies reminds me of when Eddie Murphy went undercover as a white guy & found out banks just give white people money for free
youtu.be/l_LeJfn_qW0?...
Anthropic's pre-IPO credit facility is expected to surpass its $10 billion target Anthropic is asking lead banks to lend around $1.25 billion each Other major participating banks are being asked to provide around $1 billion each
To act as if we still have time before making radical changes is in itself a form of climate denialism. Or perhaps we should call it collapse denialism.
www.currentaffairs.org/news/the-mas...
keep thinking about the evil of this. It's not just destroying the physical books, bad as that is. They are trying to remove the underpinnings of knowledge, destroy all the accumulated wisdom - and silliness, and creativity, and whatever else humans have thought worthy of writing down.
No longer content with pillaging intellectual work and dismembering our environment (already critically weakened), AI companies are now hellbent on destroying books galore including rare editions.
Shut down these nefarious enterprises already.
People keep using the "can't put a genie back in the bottle" metaphor for "AI", even though in the stories they always get back in and current "AI" is more of a "we're spending trillions of dollars and the energy output of a continent trying to keep this bastard out of the bottle" situation
I am exasperated with people accusing programmers of "gatekeeping" programming. We were practically dragging people through the gate. Do you know why a mindless LLM can tell you so much great programming information? It's because we've been sharing that information for free online for decades.
Protein folding and similar approaches are not meaningfully the same as generative models such a Large Language Models. Anybody who pretends otherwise is, whether they realise it or not, promoting a con.
@amnesty.org very based:
"Amnesty International finds that standalone generative AI systems, based on unlawful web scraping, depend on mass invasions of privacy by design, and are fundamentally incompatible with IHRL. As such, Amnesty International is calling for a prohibition of such systems."
Decided to pull out an important part of the interview.
Generative AI is often justified with comparisons to the cost of Amazon Web Services ($57bn) or Uber's ($32bn) in losses, when its costs and losses are hundreds of billions of dollars worse.
And there's no post-bubble redemption story.
Anthropic and OpenAI are dangerous and unsustainable companies that shouldn’t be taken public. The AI bubble is a con and retail investors are the marks.
AI doesn’t have ROI, it’s nothing like AWS or Uber, and it’s got no post-bubble recovery story.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbKD...
Amnesty International understanding that this "generative AI" shit as currently conceived and deployed is a project which enables fascism and endangers the already vulnerable and marginalized populations of the world.
Oh hell yeah @amnesty.org comes out swinging:
"Amnesty International finds that standalone generative AI systems... are fundamentally incompatible with IHRL. As such, Amnesty International is calling for a prohibition of such systems."
www.amnesty.org/en/documents...
the presence of technical aspects doesn't make something not creative! musicians have theory and audio engineering, visual artists have perspective, colour theory. every art you know of has a sub-layer of technical decisions that have to be made to produce an actual work
Extremely good and concise summary of the statistical/methodological shenanigans involved in measuring the so-called "AI boost"
Here's a couple of my favourites:
💜 Frustratingly, the three most common reasons for doing anything in tech are “it’s what everybody else does, so it must be right”, “a big tech company does it, so it must be right,” and “Google makes it easy to embed this in our org for free.”
The world’s "safest" AI provider now runs on the world’s dirtiest data centre: Musk’s Colossus. Powered by 35 methane generators, most unauthorised. A massive slap in the face to locals - led by @keshaunpearson.bsky.social & co - and to all those who thought Claude was the responsible choice 🙄🤢
We tried to warn you about Anthropic.
Now they're using xAI's ultra-polluting community-killing nightmare data centre to power your toxic claude relationship
All the new paid subs from @rutgerbregman.com and @quitgpt.bsky.social's campaign, now powered by Musk 🫠
www.anthropic.com/news/higher-...
I created my first Ruby gem. I mostly made it to use on my own projects and to give myself a challenge. I wrote the entire thing without the help of any LLM tools and I learned a lot in the process as a result.
github.com/PatrickMcSwe...
Frontend is failing. 75% of devices with browsers are smartphones, but not even half of sites pass Core Web Vitals on them. Why not? Too much JavaScript, added to indulge SPA fantasies the data is falsifying in real time:
infrequently.org/2025/11/perf...
"don't pay attention to any of that frivolous humanities education, STEM all the way - what, do you think you can hack a computer with poetry or something?"
apparently, yes
Looks like LLMs are *very* vulnerable to attack via poetic allusion: "curated poetic prompts yielded high attack-success rates (ASR), with some providers exceeding 90% ..."
https://arxiv.org/html/2511.15304v1
The tech press are Tim levels of cooked.
Absolutely nowhere will you see any mention of web apps and PWAs as an alternative to censorious native app stores (I looked), and that's a bloody scandal.
this from @jono.id is a position I've been suggesting for a while now–that modern APIs and CSS like View Transition obviated the need for the SPA architecture.
www.jonoalderson.com/conjecture/i...
It's been interesting to witness in real-time how the usage of "algorithm" in many places has shifted from a neutral "sequence of instructions" to a negative "controlled ordering and boosting of information".