The Lewis Lab

The Lewis Lab

@peterlewislab.bsky.social

We use biochemistry and genomics to uncover the mechanisms of gene silencing in development and cancer. UW-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health. TheLewisLab.net

1K followers795 following92 posts

The Lewis Lab reposted

The Lewis Lab reposted

The Lewis Lab reposted

Preprint alert! 🚨 We are very excited to share our new manuscript on Bohring-Opitz syndrome, a devastating rare monogenic disorder driven by truncating variants in ASXL1. This project was led by PhD student Emma Doyle, one of the OG Conway lab members 💪. 1/6 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

biorxiv.orgDivergent Pathogenic PR-DUB Complex Variants Converge Functionally Via PRC2 Displacement From ChromatinThe PR-DUB complex is responsible for erasing the repressive histone modification, H2AK119ub1. ASXL1-3 proteins are mutually exclusive catalytic partners of BAP1 in the PR-DUB complex. Somatic heteroz...

The Lewis Lab reposted

The Lewis Lab reposted

Excited to share this preprint!! with @brandonscooper.bsky.social and Bill Sullivan We tested whether endosymbiotic Wolbachia can alter host gene expression through chromatin modifications that persist from spermatogenesis to adulthood.

bioRxivpreprint@biorxivpreprint.bsky.social

Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility produces heritable chromatin modifications that suppress position-effect variegation https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.12.731975v1

The Lewis Lab reposted

The Lewis Lab reposted

Here is our article published in Nature Comm, on new players in chromatin dynamics after UV repair. This work highlights the histone chaperones DNAJC9 and MCM2 as central players in chromatin repair. Our proteomic dataset opens up new perspectives for dissecting epigenome maintenance mechanisms.

nature.comProteomic profiling of UV damage repair patches uncovers histone chaperones with central functions in chromatin repair - Nature CommunicationsChromatin states need to be maintained during DNA damage repair. Here, the authors expand the histone chaperone network involved in repair-coupled chromatin restoration and highlight a mechanistic coo...

The Lewis Lab reposted

Yaay! Well done @bluebuleta.bsky.social and team! Great to see this work finally out! Read the paper to see how SETDB1 and HUSH regulate Xist transcription

🧵 Happy to share that the final version of our study is finally out in @natcomms.nature.com today: www.nature.com/articles/s41... What started as an unexpected observation—that SETDB1 depletion accelerates X chromosome silencing—led us to uncover a role for SETDB1 in regulating Xist transcription.

The Lewis Lab reposted

We’ve recently been awarded a MIRA R35 and an R01 to study non-canonical roles and missense mutations of the Polycomb system in health, cancer, and neurodevelopmental disorders. We are seeking an animal tech with lab manager duties. Please share!

The Lewis Lab reposted

In a genome not so far away, the most elegant design in the galaxy was already wrapped into ~147 base pairs. #HappyNucleosomeDay, May-The-Fourth Be With You.

Alexis Verger 🧬🧫🧪@alexis-verger.cpesr.fr

It's already back ???? #Maythe4thBeWithYou #MayThe4th #MayTheFourthBeWithYou Well, somebody has to do it @nucleosomepolice.bsky.social 🫣 poke @markhamillofficial.bsky.social Did you know that the nucleosome inspires the Millennium Falcon design and made the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs ?

The Lewis Lab reposted

Excited to share our structural insights into how microtubules differentially guide phosphorylation of kinetochore-microtubule regulators, Ndc80 and MCAK, for chromosome segregation. Heroic efforts by Yiming Niu with a fun collaboration with Jennifer DeLuca lab! www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

science.orgMicrotubules guide Aurora B substrate geometries for accurate chromosome segregationCryo-EM reveals how kinetochore-microtubule attachment is regulated by Aurora B substrate accessibility on microtubules.

Microtubules have been viewed as passive structural supports, but a study from @hirofunabiki.bsky.social in @science.org Advances redefines microtubules as active regulators, helping to prevent abnormalities in the number of chromosomes, a hallmark of cancer. 🔗: https://bit.ly/4v8miCC

The Lewis Lab reposted

The Lewis Lab reposted

Proud to share the yeast telomerase structure, led by the talented @hongmiaohu.bsky.social in collaboration with the Wellinger and Chartrand labs. Discovered 37 years ago and took us nearly 7 years but totally worth the wait 😍. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFE4...

youtube.comCryo-EM structure of yeast telomeraseYouTube video by MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology

Led by Investigator Scientist @hongmiaohu.bsky.social, @kellythd-nguyen.bsky.social’s group in the LMB’s Structural Studies Division have produced the first ever structure of telomerase from yeast. Read more here: mrclmb.ac.uk/news-events/... #LMBResearch #cryoEM 🧪

The Lewis Lab reposted

Supercoiling not only brings DNA to life (and makes it dance) but also changes how key proteins such as #CRISPR interact with it. Thanks @qmsmith.bsky.social for the brilliant collaboration, Sylvia for developing an amazing new #imageanalysis pipeline & @eddierollins.bsky.social for beautiful #AFM.

Quentin Smith@qmsmith.bsky.social

1/11 In our story out today in @nature.com , we showcase the molecular mechanisms that enable Cas9 to bind and cleave negatively supercoiled ((-)SC) off-targets! 🧬🧵 🔗 www.nature.com/articles/s41... #CRISPR #Cas9 #DNATopology #AFM #CryoEM #SingleMolecule #Biophysics

View full thread

Which DAXX functions are required for ERV silencing? DAXX mutants defective in ATRX binding or H3.3 deposition still restore ERV repression. By contrast, deletion of the C terminal SIM abolishes silencing. Thus, ERV repression requires the C terminal SIM, but not ATRX binding or H3.3 deposition.

These separation-of-function mutants show that H3.3 deposition can be genetically uncoupled from ERV silencing. This supports our earlier finding that H3.3 deposition at ERVs is dispensable for repression. Instead, repression depends on the C-terminal SIM and interaction with SUMOylated effectors.

View full thread

We previously showed that the DAXX HBD alone is insufficient for H3.3 deposition. Deleting the final eight amino acids, which removes the C-terminal SIM, blocks H3.3 accumulation at ERVs without affecting DAXX localization.

One SUMOylated protein that binds the DAXX C-terminal SIM is the ATPase MORC3. Removing the SIM abolishes the DAXX-MORC3 interaction and prevents MORC3 recruitment to ERVs. MORC3 knockout cells likewise lose H3.3 accumulation at these loci.

View full thread

Previously, we demonstrated that the DAXX four-helix bundle mediates ATRX interaction. But point mutations in this domain, or deletion of it, do not disrupt DAXX binding to ERVs or H3.3 accumulation at these sites.

View full thread

In our study, we asked how DAXX promotes H3.3 deposition mechanistically. Genome-wide, DAXX is not widely distributed across repeats. It is concentrated at a restricted subset of evolutionarily young ERVK elements, where it restrains ERV expression and influences nearby genes.

We identified a conserved basic patch within the tower domain of the DAXX histone-binding domain. Using recombinant HBD-H3.3-H4 complexes, we found that mutation of this surface weakened interaction with DNA in vitro.

A major challenge in interpreting H3.3 knockout phenotypes is that loss of H3.3 affects more than chromatin incorporation. It also causes a marked drop in DAXX abundance. Thus, ERV derepression in H3.3-null cells could reflect loss of H3.3 nucleosome assembly, loss of DAXX, or both.

Happy 30th birthday to this paper published March 22, 1996, one of the studies that moved chromatin biology from correlation toward mechanism. Brownell et al. linked a transcription-associated Tetrahymena HAT to yeast Gcn5p, providing a biochemical link for chromatin modification to gene activation.

View full thread

And then decisive experiment. Recombinant Gcn5p expressed in E. coli had HAT activity in the in-gel assay, whereas uninduced and vector-only controls lacked activity. With that, Gcn5p was assigned a direct biochemical activity, linking histone acetylation more directly to transcriptional activation.

The paper closes with a model: Gcn5-containing HAT complexes are targeted to active genes by the transcription machinery, providing a direct link between histone acetylation and gene activation. A fitting paper to revisit 30 years later, on what would have been Dave Allis's 75th birthday, March 22.

Happy 30th birthday to this paper published March 22, 1996, one of the studies that moved chromatin biology from correlation toward mechanism. Brownell et al. linked a transcription-associated Tetrahymena HAT to yeast Gcn5p, providing a biochemical link for chromatin modification to gene activation.

View full thread

Then came the validation. Anti-peptide antibodies detected a single 55 kDa species, tracked with the active RP-HPLC fractions, and immunodepleted ~60% of HAT activity. p55 was not just associated with HAT A. It was the catalytic subunit.

The conceptual surprise was in the sequence. Tetrahymena p55 turned out to be highly homologous to yeast Gcn5p, a known transcriptional co-activator: ~40% identity, ~60% similarity, with a conserved bromodomain.

Happy 30th birthday to this paper published March 22, 1996, one of the studies that moved chromatin biology from correlation toward mechanism. Brownell et al. linked a transcription-associated Tetrahymena HAT to yeast Gcn5p, providing a biochemical link for chromatin modification to gene activation.

Starting from the previously purified active p55 HAT A subunit, Brownell et al. sequenced six internal peptides, designed degenerate primers, and assembled the cDNA by PCR and RACE. The predicted protein sequence then recovered all six peptides from the purified enzyme.