Post

We'ee not seeing the option to add? App has auto updated?

It's a really great feature guys!! Keep up the good work.

Now my links are disappear

that first-24-hours number is the kind of thing that either means you built something people actually needed, or you got lucky with timing. curious which one you think it is, or both?

" there was an internal miscommunication and these were accidentally added to the list of disallowed domains" ... right

And goes back to beginning of I touch a person’s page ! Really annoying !

I am having a problem with BlueSky jumping - it has never happened before but when I get into it, it jumps ! As if I have finger on things but I don’t ! Please fix !

yw. this is where i learned about the update by the way

ohh. i just assumed since it was already merged in the source code and alex had said there was an update that the code was already on the website

Really good change

Can you also deploy web 👀

This is great, but why isn't ActBlue considered a recognized "Support Site?" (or WinRed for that matter, not that there's too many GOP candidates around these parts...)

Wow, 20K users added 60K links in 24h! 🚀 Great bug‑fix update—keep polishing, team Kalyx AI & Matteo! 😂

Probably an aggressive anti-spam measure. There is a steady stream of porn bots.

@dssanctuary.bsky.social that could be what happened

These domain were explicitly designated as "sites that can't be added as profile links" under BLOCKED_DOMAINS, not "sites that are hidden to unlogged/underage users". This was not an accident or an error: someone wrote (or had the AI write) code that way, and someone greenlit the result.

One of the many reasons AI is a fascist technology- accountability washing. Who's at fault for discriminating against the sex workers? Was it really a whoopsy doopsy as dev boy up there implies? Did Meta's automation "accidentally" suspended No Kings account? Can't ever tell.

This really needs an answer. This is at least the second time Bluesky has implemented things that appear to target adult creators. We have filters for a bizarre number of types of nudity but none solely for violence or disturbing content. This sure feels like they’d like us gone.

Hopefully just something to do with the feature not being finished and making sure it doesn't show up for people that specifically opted out of adult content or for users that are verified as minors. That being said, with their previous track record I'm not going to automatically give them grace.

Total waste of time - doesn't work (or even findable!). Stick to implementing simple stuff that works. KISS: Keep It Simple, Stu▪︎▪︎▪︎

Glad is fixed and all but like... do you really think anyone believes a word? "Accidentally"? lmaoooo

👁️ Happy for the reversal but I am afraid that past lapses leave it hard to immediately believe the BlueSky team when you say it's a miscommunication.

Suuuuuure it was accidental. For sure dude, it was all a miscommmunication. Mhmm, I believe that. Yep, suuuuure do.

I *think* the part where it was also blocking link shorteners/redirects might have been intentional? To protect from phishing?

Do you really expect people to believe this?

As happy as I am about this being fixed, what has happened that this "internal miscommunication" has happened as it did? The original code was explicit about what domains, sites to block, and we genuinely feared the worst.

you literally keep dropping the ball on the same things

Mhm

Yeah, it’s the internet. People can’t read or they just think too much or overread into things xD

Thanks man.

Hey! I saw that you can add links to profiles in labelers accounts just in the same way as regular accounts but they don't show up! Idk if I should maybe open a Github issue/discussion to fix that or it's intended. Could be useful to link a website with extended details about the labels or something

I'm not sure that's true. I've seen a lot of people who work with vulnerable kids saying that social media provides one of the few spaces where they can find support, particularly in hostile family situations.

tbh I think we see way more issues with seniors on social media than minors

are there plans to let users self-label their links like you can with posts? in the lexicon for link records i see an entry for something like this but i don't see any option for it in the regular app

u could test it. put on adult account, check with one after changing settings

It could be an idea for profile links to display them when hidden under a "more links" dialog if interstitials for all links isn't on the cards.

For unverified UK users, though, we don't seem to be able to set any links at all.

According to @attie.ai , 66 accounts currently have links to steady.page in their profiles. So it's not just me.

"accidentally"

Has the precise nature of that "internal miscommunication" been publicly articulated anywhere? Or evidence that the inclusion of adult-oriented platforms in `BLOCKED_DOMAINS` was "accidental", especially in light of the public code repository suggesting it was conscious & explicit?

also how come the link settings are age restricted? doesnt make much sense lol 💀💀

"accidentally"

That's a very specific set of things to disallow.

Looking for a meaningful connection? ❤️ The best relationships begin with honesty, kindness, and genuine conversations. Take your time, be yourself, and let the right connection grow naturally. Discover more dating tips at lovematch.site #Dating #Relationships #Love

Is there any intuitive way to add crypto addresses used for public donations?

It's very nice. I've noticed that when you're on your own profile and click on your link it doesn't follow the link but goes into editing it, even though you're not in Edit mode. Maybe it's a bug?

You have a problem right now.

It's a very cool feature ngl, hope it comes back