Post

MN GOP AG candidate Ron Schutz buys into Trump's big lie 👇 HAUSER: Have you seen evidence there's anything wrong w/ our elections? SCHUTZ: I get anecdotal evidence H: But nothing authoritative? S: Well, I don't know if I would dismiss first-hand accounts. I have not done any investigation

266 reposts1.1K likes

The number of GOP politicians that buy into this crap, well proven to be wrong, has always made me wonder why? Why risk your reputation and all that for a lie that's been proven many times over wrong? Just.....WHY? I've come to the conclusion that it's either blackmail (Epstein) or payola.

I'm a MN election judge; the rules around vouching are very specific. The person doing the vouching signs an affidavit swearing that the person they are vouching for lives in the precinct. There are legal penalties if it turns out that they don't. Observers who don't know details are just guessing.

Common misconception about vouching in Minnesota. A registered voter in the precinct can only vouch that you live in the precinct. You still have to have a photo ID to register.

He’s a good Republican. Close your eyes and spread lies. Hearsay is not evidence and eyewitness see what they want to see. Do the work. Show me the paper proof. Show me the numbers. Talk about facts. That’s what an AG is supposed to do.

The difference between anecdotal evidence compared to real stats: Voter fraud incident rates @ .0003%-.0025% can't sway any election. 34% of states passing election impediment laws & gerrymandered districts will sway every election.

They care, passionately! Just not enough to, look. They are lying, it's ok to stop pretending they are not lying. I don't believe you. Why are you saying that? Show me. If you're going to waste our viewers time with radical right allegations, we'll have to cut you short.

Tom Hauser doesnt know how to press these people. Lets them get away with..hearsay is good enough for me for the same party that wouldn’t accept Trump could be a felon even after he was found guilty by a jury of peers and lots of evidence

Well my neighbor’s cousin knows a guy who said his coworker saw people in Antifa outfits rigging elections. It’s hard to ignore that kind of evidence.

he himself hasn't looked into it because he knows he's lying. why is he even running then if he doesn't believe the outcome will be free and fair? why would you spend all that time and money on that instead of something else?

VOTE OUT ALL REPUBLICANS EVERY CHANCE YOU GET! REPUBLICANS SUPPORT PEDOPHILES AND PEDOFELON47 t-RUMP THE SEXUAL ASSAULTER! RELEASE THE TRUMP-EPSTEIN FILES NOW, LIARS!

Anecdotal evidence reflects personal feelings, opinions, or single accounts. Usually unverified and not truth. It is not tested or measured using scholarly or scientific methods. Those few people that he talked to at the state fair are probably missing a few screws, too.

These guys...even if there is some anecdotal evidence ...that is all of what, couple hundred improper vouching? Did that swing the election? NO! Get data or shut up.

In their respective MN primaries, Ellison (DEM) got 550,000 votes, 85% of the total DEM vote. Schutz got 370,000 votes, 100% of the GOP total. Offhand, barring an Act of God, I think Schutz is gonna lose. VOTE VOTE VOTE!

So appalling. Post regime change, arrest all of the enablers and charge them with - attempting to subvert the Democratic process.

Must be so-o-o-o frustrating that there isn't one single Repugnican in the whole wide world smart enough to expose the "massive" fraud that invalidates all those elections.