Post

I feel like as a journalist if you don't include the numerous times this man has been preposterously full of shit somewhere in your first two paragraphs you're failing both humanity and your readership

I like how there's ZERO mention by the NYT of the fact musk has spent the last year primarily coddling white supremacists and authoritarian propagandists must just not be newsworthy that a guy like that receives billions in taxpayer dollars and has numerous significant security clearances

there's just zero financial incentive for the brunchlords in the mainstream press to engage in any meaningful introspection in the way they cover rich bullshitters 10 straight years of tripping over their own dicks and zero lessons learned

"I said 'could,' not 'would'," will be his response. Presumably followed by some sort of "joke" attempt like, him just posting with no other context "morning would"

A 7 month trip, one way, and there is not an existing launch vehicle nor travel capsule nor landing vehicle nor return plan nor staff plan? If we are just credulously printing anything, I think I will be able to bench 500 lbs next year, too

while putting the fact he isn't an engineer, and has never designed anything of note, in the eighteenth paragraph if they mention it at all

So: 2011: Musk will put a man on Mars in 10 years 2017: Musk will put a man on Mars in 6 years 2023: Musk will put a man on Mars in 4 years By 2030 he'll be promising to do it during the interview.

And then, I guess, in 2034 when he gets that question he'll be saying there have already been people on Mars for two years. Which is completely absu—no, actually, you're right, that tracks.

ZERO mention of the fact he's spent the last year primarily coddling white supremacists and authoritarian propagandists must just not be newsworthy that a guy like that receives billions in taxpayer dollars and has numerous significant security clearances

Chang has been covering science for a very long time. He should know better. OTOH, this is a good piece by a space reporter about the questions Musk didn't get but should have about deliverables that SpaceX owes to various U.S. government agencies soon. arstechnica.com/space/2023/1...

arstechnica.comWorld’s largest space conference succeeds in making a Starship update boringIn a much-anticipated Starship Q&A, no one asked about the stuff we all want to know.

Natalie Angier, Natural Obsessions It's such a terrible book. The topic is fine, the people featured in it are all good scientists, the effort of the immersion was real, it should have been everything one would want, but the result is so awful.