Post

The generation that got to buy cheap houses thanks to a postwar construction boom, then blocked new housing construction to juice their asset values is now whining that they have to pay taxes on their unearned wealth. Just breathtaking selfishness.

745 reposts3.3K likes

Honestly, good. I hope this works. They need to feel the pain of their schools, roads, emergency services, libraries, etc deteriorating. Business will flee and their home values will plummet. Maybe then they will finally begin to understand what it means to be part of a society.

I think the folks whining about property taxes are idiots. However, when we bought our first house, it was with a variable rate mortgage at around 9%. We also took out two seconds at 12% interest rate each, and paid all three every month. It was not easy and it did not feel cheap.

This is 100% not a national issue, and not a state issue. You don't like property tax, vote out your county commissioners. These supposed conservatives, all of a sudden very interested in centralizing power. Stay out of my local governments fascist pukes.

Why am I not surprised it's Republican states where this is strongest? Okay, let's fund schools by increased income taxes, it's more fair anyway.

If they refuse to pay their property taxes than the must be prepared to pay the consequences, a forced sale of their property to pay the amount they owe....pretty simple. I'm an 80 year old man who clearly understands the value of all of us supporting the essential services we all benefit from.

Obviously this doesn't apply to every individual, but as a generation Boomers have been the most selfish generation I think tge country has ever endured.

But billionaires don't have to pay taxes on their unearned wealth. It's one of the great disparities - billionaires can shield their wealth as "unrealized" and NEVER pay takes on it. While today "poor" folks get taxed endlessly.

businessinsider.comHow billionaires like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk avoid paying federal income tax while increasing their net worth by billionsAmerican Billionaires are able to skip paying federal income taxes by reducing their income to zero, even as their net worth soars.
Bill Walter@billwalter.bsky.social

Most Americans, conservative and liberal, agree that America was great in the 1950's, when the top marginal tax rate was 91%, corporations paid 35% of all federal taxes, and the average working American paid nothing. It's the middle class that makes a capitalist society strong and prosperous.

Definitely we should return to a similar tax structure- but not a similar social structure. The fifties were great if you were white, cis, christian and male. If you didn't fit exactly in that slot, great was somewhere between elusive and impossible.

Agreed. We are woke now to abuse and the techniques of abusers - we cannot, and should not go back. Indeed it was the prosperity of the 1950's that would spark the peace corps and the civil rights movement. "Waking" the oppressors to the fact that any widespread prosperity would threaten them.

You’re wrong. They got to buy “cheap” houses because after the war the financial system was re-established on a footing oriented towards the real economy, not siphoning off the economic surplus, like today. House prices are determined by speculative demand, not (merely) quantity.

Well, to be fair, I know a lot of boomers (and older) who are not represented by the one person quoted here. Let's not define an entire generation (or more) based on this one person. Yes, this person and others like him exist, but they're not a reason to hate an entire generation (or more.)

They're confusing a civilized country that redistributes wealth, so that it remains civilized with education, postal services, health care facilities and services, utilities, transportation systems, libraries, telecommunications, the Internet, AI, and more; with their own country as a property.

‘Why are property taxes so high?’…well you greedy fucks cut taxes on the wealthy and corporations, and stopped funding local services, so the revenue had to come from somewhere. Tax the rich. Tax wealth. Tax multiple home ownership to death. It’s not communism, it is a working society.

You can assume whatever motivations you want, but no one's "blocked new housing construction to juice their asset value" unless by "juicing asset value" you mean not wanting to live next to industrial buildings or sky-darkening high-rise apartments. Capital gains tax is another issue altogether.

Wouldn’t “housing starts as a percentage of new adult population” be a better measure? Would probably show similar, but still

"A fairer system, [the anti-tax advocate] argued, would make people pay for the government services they use, but not those they don’t. 'I’m not willing to [pay taxes on] my home for a book or a walk in the park'” I bet he LOVES toll roads

“I want to own my house, live in it, enjoy all the safety and comforts and financial benefits of living in a civil society, and make other people pay for my share of that privilege.” - a lot of selfish ashpoles

I’ll gladly stop paying property taxes when I no longer 1) own property and 2) enjoy the benefits of living in a civil society that must be funded and paid for. Because I try not to be a selfish piece of shit.

Its intensely frustrating watching Oregon descending into ever increasing austerity due at least in part to a property tax cap and Oregonians continue to fight against every targeted tax to fix things voters actually want...

It's a reminder that Oregon was founded explicitly as a whites-only state and white people freak out when people who aren't white get any social services at all. That's the root of the "Somali fraud" BS the Republicans are pushing in Minnesota.

Agreed. I still don't believe Christine D who wants to wade into county tax and local school districts has good intentions. Seem more like she wants the Governor to control local tax and schools at the state level, like Texas - which is not local, and not conservative.

Many states have capped the increase in the tax bills to tie to inflation, followed by an uncap and return to market value when the house is sold. In Mich. under Prop. A, in effect for about 35 years, that 72-year-old's tax bill on the home he's had for 40 years is half of that of his new neighbor.

Yeah it's terrible. Puts the burden on young adults looking to start families, while the elderly are penalized for downsizing. And then we wonder why all our young people leave...

I'm beginning to think that intentional over-55 ghettos like "The Villages" in Florida might serve a purpose if they gather up these selfish amoral douchebags and wall them off from the rest of us.

This is among the dumbest fucking things I’ve seen in a while. You can argue about the amount of a property tax, or the use of its proceeds, but to claim that property to which taxes attach are not owned is just stupid.

That chart says housing hasn't kept pace with population growth but the chart doesn't show population growth. Population growth in the US has slowed significantly. There have been 4 decades of <10% growth and 3 of those have been in the last 4 decades

Population growth from 1940 to 1980 was 71% and from 1980 to 2020 it was 46%. That's a 35% drop in population growth so I'd assume a roughly 35% drop in housing starts relative to the population would be about normal.

Yes this is selfishness but you are bad at math. The guy quoted at the beginning of the article is 72, so he likely bought his first house in the Reagan admin. NOT during the postwar construction boom, they are all long dead

A postwar housing boom that was heavily subsidized by the federal government. The GI Bill adjusted for inflation would be about $400billion, FHA and FNMA racks up a couple hundred billion each, and another $300billion for highways.