Post

This level of anti-customer behavior is only possible when you have an effective monopoly and know the customer will have to react to your wishes rather than you reacting to customer needs.

It’s in retaliation for being scrutinized over their interference in the Ukraine defense, the US can’t force them to launch new satellites if they don’t have a current rocket to launch. It’s only one part of the problem allowing SpaceX to do what NASA should be.

No, I think it's just a business decision: Assuming they can get reuse working, Starship will be much cheaper per-launch than F9, and the payloads that cannot be made to fit into the pez dispenser form factor make up a small enough fraction of their revenue stream to not be worth keeping F9 flying.

Musk is a national security risk, as outlined by the article's first paragraph: "SpaceX’s plans to retire its most popular rocket could jeopardize the United States’ ability to launch military satellites — a plight compounded by the Pentagon’s dependence on Elon Musk’s company."

They’ve got launches on it scheduled up through at least 2030, but there’s no room or capacity for any additional launches in that time frame with the phaseout

Almost like it was a terrible idea to let an essential capacity be effectively monopolized by a for-profit company that answers to a tiny claque of insatiably greedy shareholders. That said company is run by a fascist lunatic only compounds the problem.

It would make a lot of sense for the next Administration to force SpaceX to spin off the Falcon 9 business to ensure continued American access to space.

A reliable rocket that dominates the industry doesn’t juice stock prices and idiot investors like an unreliable, possibly death-spiraling rocket that may put robots on the moon or some shit