Post

OOOOO @wsj.com What a bombshell bit of reporting. Did you do the same with Musk/Trump and Starshield. All of your bombshell reporting should be viewed with skepticism. It seems you have an agenda and it is not accuracy or democracy.

I would term this a "correction" or a "retraction" rather than an "update", WSJ. That's the norm when you're caught being dead wrong.

Get fucked

"Retraction"? "Correction?" Questions are being raised about your sht hackery. I'm not able to say whether these are true or not, but it's out there.

Update:

It's like the Wall Street Journal manufactured an October surprise

Go suck eggs you pandering wingnut rag.

Maybe, as a newspaper, you should do reporting before publishing absolute trash.

This is stupid

You idiots suck

Pathetic. Issue a correction. The reporter and editors should also be reprimanded, but she is a Democrat so that won't happen.

Update: The Wall Street Journal printed a lie about a candidate for US Senate

SUCK A DICK YOU FUCKING LOSERS

gfy

Worst Stinkin' Journalism.

Why isn’t this a retraction? PBK confirmed her membership.

Love that you're hours late to your own update bsky.app/profile/star...

Why are you not revoking the story and issuing an apology? Zero journalistic integrity you fucking hacks

You guys are clowns. How hard would have been to contact the organization before the first article?

Read the original headline. Read it again. Then ponder your place in the annals of journalism.

lol

So the reporting on this wasn’t done correctly

The WSJ do *journalism*?! Of course they would do no such thing! 😝

Yes, I *was* wrong, and I have already admitted my mistake. I did not read the article because I haven't given WSJ any money.

Hmmm ... I suppose that my alma mater paid the induction fee on my behalf, 43 years ago! Thanks, University of Santa Clara.

I guess that will have to do for a retraction and apology, huh?

@thepressbox.bsky.social how does this happen? How does the Murdochs' supposedly "down the middle" political reporting part of the WSJ a) not verify w the actual organization first and b) think whether a candidate graduated Phi Beta Kappa is worthwhile potential "scandal" less than two weeks out?

Oh, look! The corrupt Wall Street Journal is lying again. I swear, they're just Fox News in a prettier package

Bwahahahaha. You fucking clowns. You break a big story about massive corruption in the Administration and then your hack editors and fascist bosses demand some equal time, you cook up the stupidest, most irrelevant story possible and manage to fuck it up by not even making a cursory check.

So you are bad at your jobs and never attempted to confirm anything and should be sued

Eat shit, fascist liars.

WSJ should be embarrassed and/or investigated for this sloppy attempt at a hit piece.

BREAKING: Politician neglects to tie own shoelaces. UPDATE: On closer inspection, they are loafers.

We get it: you need a counterwieght to all the GOP lying and corruption. If you insist on this course, no matter how trivial the supposed dem transgression, just make sure it's true before publishing.

"Update: we printed something that was not true without checking on it first.”

damn seems like if yall actually did your jobs you wouldn’t end up looking so fucking stupid

APOLOGIZE

I’m guessing the guy that wrote this sloppy piece was never phi beta kappa

I'm sorry you're stupid. There, I apologized just like you dipshits.

This guy officers. Check his hard drive

Really showed your malice on this one, it's so actual.

Update: we printed bullshit lies with zero verification because we're dumb hacks

This warrants an apology, bud.