Post

I've always been a fan of the Nordic model, but the disease that is anti-immigration populism has infected that region as well. It's harder now for me to think of them as a warm and friendly people.

Well, not actually if you read Adam Smith. In fact, he kinda came up with the concept “share the wealth” in Theory of Sentimental Morals. And Wealth of Nations is littered with slaps at the rich. Essentially, he saw capitalism as a way to help the lower levels.

We have a problem with the word "Capitalism". Marx mentioned Adam Smith more than 100 times in Das Kapital. Smith wrote "read, write and ACCOUNT" FIVE times & used the word 'education' EIGHTY Times. Without mandatory accounting in schools it ain't Capitalism! Smith knew Capitalists were Bastards!

But, these hoomans are too human. They tolerate too much information hiding by Morons. How do they not notice economists saying nothing about Decades of Depreciation in useless variations of Automobiles? Maybe Vulcan Anarchism could work. bsky.app/profile/umbr...

Umbrarchist@umbrarchist.bsky.social

No government sounds cool but what kind of people can run a complex technological society? What have anarchists been saying about Planned Obsolescence since Apollo 11? "Vulcan Anarchism" As described by ChatGPT:

Let me define the difference between a Capitalist and Socialist government... Capitalist: Using all your hard earned taxpayer money to benefit oligarchs and corporations. Socialist: Using all your hard earned taxpayer money to benefit the taxpaying masses.

Big capitalists buy up the little capitalists until there are only a few big capitalists who have taken everything from everyone. Capitalism only works for the capitalists who own everything. Wall Street is nothing more than rigged gambling we are forced into by the capitalists. No thank you.

To be fair, the system isn't closed. It receives a colossal daily input of energy from the Sun. If only we had the means and the will to put this to work, we probably could have quite extended growth. But capitalists prefer to use up our little local resources and destroy a perfectly good planet.

FF magnates probably have lawyers working on ways to stake claims on sunlight, wind, mass displacement of water, & heat from the earth's core. Once they solve that problem & get their puppet politicians to enact the required legislation (for us to pay them for access), they'll drop FF overnight.

Yes! Living systems are Open systems. Closed systems yield self-destruction, meeting the requirement of the Law of Entropy. Lost in the false belief of materialism, we have forgotten how to live. We have forgotten the importance of Wisdom, Truth, Love, Goodness, and Unity.

It wouldn't work very long But if the country is like the US of A, then do what you do. How the frick they manage to spend so much money whitout public free healthcare?

The problem is failing to hold our "of, by, and for the people" government accountable, accepting and electing politicians who are beholden to corporations and super rich politically connected donors. We're exploited, pay taxes, vote and are responsible for the state we are in. Every one of US.

Predatory capitalism is what happens when the government stops protecting consumers - it's the deregulation that will eventually destroy capitalism. If the middle and lower classes are eviscerated, who will do the consuming? Trump is destroying all regs that protect consumers and the environment.

Oh, yes, Democratic Socialism. It's not Socialism, folks, that's why it works. It doesn't do away with Capitalism, it uses it as a tool to provide for the needs of the People. Capitalism is put in its proper place as a tool, rather than a greed machine destroying the People.

AI says… there is quite a difference. Here’s the core difference in one sentence: · Social Democracy uses capitalism to fund a welfare state. · Democratic Socialism wants to replace capitalism with a worker-owned system.

This definition is wrong. Capitalism is based on the FACT of a thing or service being worth more to one person than another. Your statement’s ‘capitalism’ is the ‘no regulations’ version of capitalism. And ‘no regulations’ is how US football could be 43-man Squamish, later known as Calvinball.

With the development of AI, the end goal of the capitalist class is fully automated luxury living for them and a few trusted quislings, and the eradication of the rest of us. This could very well happen within your lifetime.

While I am not an anti-capitalist, I feel that everyone should contribute the same percentage of their income to the operation of our country. Why should those of wealth pay a lesser percent of their income as those who are barely getting by? What merits that special consideration?

Or maybe not? The rich have more money, they could be paying more. Everybody can live whit same income after taxes. (Some differences must still exist to give a reason for people to do the higher income jobs)

The capitalist world system was created/implemented by slavers for the sole purpose of using the transatlantic slave trade to make themselves richer than kings. Every year capitalism has existed, there have been more enslaved people on earth than the year before, as kings are replaced by capitalists

Absolutely....the "moderate" Dems are just like "moderate" GOP. We need our Party to be "for the people"...which the so called moderates are not. They are owned by rich donors. IT'S TIME FOR DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS something like FDR but even more like Zohran!

Surprisingly Republicans used to believe in protecting workers, the environment, retirement savings, public health and access to healthcare. Heather Cox Richardson recently pointed to the 1956 Repub platform that would surprise many today as even being the Democratic platform. Read it and learn.

I agree with all of this but i dont understand why you singled out republicans. Democrats have fought socialism just as aggressively as republicans have

Because Republicans have primarily been the ones gutting education and support systems. Mostly while Dems just watched and didn't do much to stop or repair them, but the Right-wing has been the primary actors in the disassembly of functional society. That's probably why.

This is either you being profoundly ignorant, or you know that what you just asked doesnt have an answer. And the reason theres no answer is because fascist entities constantly attack anyone that attempts real socialism. So how about you just go fuck yourself :)

Marie In Atlanta@marie-atl.bsky.social

Friendly recommendation: People came to 🇺🇸 from other places where "socialism" was 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙙 to describe governments they fled. In many cases what the "socialist" political system was actually dictatorship & authoritarianism. DSA, define "socialism" for those folks or they'll rely on the GOP's definition

I believe Democratic Socialism was always the intent. In other words... The intent was that our democratic socio-economic system... "for the ppl by the ppl"... would inherently impose the required restraints on Capitism. Capitalism was to be guided by the rules of Democracy. Not the reverse!

Most, if not all, of those countries still exploit the global south. They're just better at offloading that suffering from their own people, but somebody somewhere is bearing the brunt of an inherently unjust system.

It's even worse, it's a system built on exploitation, otherwise there's no profit. And that exploitation can only be outsourced to other countries for so long, eventually, it'll have to come back around. And that's what we se, that's what people suffer from and fascism says "Thank you, capitalism".

This is why they're so worried about the decline in population. We used to understand that overpopulation was a bad thing. Bad for the planet, bad for us. Ever increasing consumption is simply stupid.

It's remarkable how rarely this is pointed out. If I gave you a bucket, and added a drop of water to it, and for every minute thereafter, I'd add 10% more water to the bucket than the last, you would protest that the bucket was going to overflow. This is why economics got called "the dismal science"

When the Right calls everyone left of Hitler a "Radical Left Loonie", there's really no reason not to go hard on socialism, most people don't even know what these words mean anyway.

It captures the real tension between capitalism’s pressure on ecological systems and the reality that billionaires in the USA are often taxed far less fairly than ordinary people..

We have a problem with the word "Capitalism". Marx mentioned Adam Smith more than 100 times in Das Kapital. Smith wrote "read, write and ACCOUNT" FIVE times & used the word 'education' EIGHTY Times. Without mandatory accounting in schools it ain't Capitalism! Smith knew Capitalists were Bastards!

They have crushed the middle class. Republicans swing towards lawless white collar superiority while calling democrats “Godless communists”. Meanwhile, they give farmers more bailouts for their votes and take away our MC and SS.

They're gaslighting us to think that a few thousand people hoarding billions of tax-free dollars has no bearing on the financial strength of hundreds of million people who build things & do actual work that profits the billionaires. When in fact, 50% of Americans control only 2.5% of the US economy

Nope. A small handful of Ayn Rand zealots and misc tech cornucopians push that nonsense. Capitalism does not exist in a vacuum. It is limited and guided by a bureaucracy, by law. Failures of Capitalism are failures of government, which in a democracy is a failure of the electorate.

I agree, that Capitalism doesn’t make us happy. Some become rich and many poor. Something should change! But the experiment with socialism didn’t work on Eastern Germany! Should we really make that mistake again?

Unrelenting greed is precisely cancer. Here's the thing: cancer *always* loses. Yes, if not excised early enough it can kill its host. But if the host dies, it dies too! It's a stupid strategy for a cell in your body and it's a stupid strategy even for "brilliant" tech bros or would-be dictators.

🔥 Exactly. As I've consistently found on all social media sites I've utilized - #Bluesky included - 🤑 #centrist 🔵 HATES the left wing 😳 OF ITS OWN PARTY (almost?) as much as Trump. S. 🔵 #3rdWay🔵 particularly HATES the anti-corporatist #DemocraticSocialists' #economics. apple.news/A1Hmfe465S16...

apple.newsEstablishment Democrats Are Embracing Loserdom — The NationSome centrists would rather have Trump triumph than forge an alliance with the left.

Again, please answer the simple question: What will the socialists do different this time that will enable it to succeed … so far, no answer has been provided. Why not? Maybe because socialism is still just a power grab by the elites.

Capitalism is about using resources more productively to achieve growth. This has nothing to do with the 'finite resources' issue. Of course 'capitalism' does not guarantee that benefits of productivity are distributed 'fairly'. So that's why we have governments.

Still, some of that population will be the losers. You cannot get infinite growth, the world is not infinite. If it's big, it is big but it will still grow to the limit where it can't just sustain growth. There is always someone the money is taken from.

If we think we have an affordability crisis now, lol, let's see where we are in a month. Trump fucked up the housing crisis, there is no "MOU" / Peace agreement with IRAN, the gas is going to $10.00 a gallon, the fighting will continue, we're out of weapons, interest on the growing debt is sky high!

Oh fuck off. You all can only win 3 measly seats in a deep blue state. You have less seats now than in 2018. Half the Squad got their asses kicked their next election. Your fucking platform is more Trump than anything. Good luck telling Americans who you really are.

.. It's more than just health care too .. I don't understand it very well because I'm not Insane , Racism , "Religion" , Money , Mysogony .. and more attract the magat culture people it seems .. And they don't care if their voting against their best intrests ..

Democratic Socialism is NOT Communism! It’s time Americans educated themselves on the difference. DS works in Europe and Canada and the citizens are better off.

Those countries are NOT socialist. They are social democracies. Think of the difference between the former East Germany (socialist) and West Germany (capitalist with a social democratic structure)

Communism is much like socialism with a few differences. I was surprised while discovering some Communists on Bluesky and YouTube. I took the time to pay attention and found they were quite knowledgeable. Always seem to learn something new on those days.

It's not a closed finite system. Example, in caveman times they had these otherwise useless rocks. But nowadays we use those rocks to make nuclear power. Resources are based on our knowledge of using them. I would recommend to read Begining of Infinity.

Just to remind folks that social security was started during the presidency of Democrat Franklin Roosevelt. Medicare was started during the presidency of Democrat Lyndon Johnson. Both programs are socialist programs the gop has been trying to gut for years.

This is Malthusianism. We may live in a closed, finite system in a literal sense, but practically we keep finding ways to expand what we thought were limits. We can protect our resources and environment and grow.

By the 2028 elections we will see Blue MAGA accounts here who were so far up Jefferies and Schumer's asses only their legs stuck out cheering the DSA faction of the Democratic Party. Then, they will quietly vote for Harris and get 4 more years of fascism when she loses.

Sweden is a great model. Sweden practices a robust, free-market form of capitalism paired with a strong social safety net. Often misunderstood as socialist, its economy relies heavily on private property, multinational corporations, and stock-exchange-listed companies. Look how happy they are!

I’ve never heard it put that way, but what a perfect analogy.. ..and the billionaire owners are the health insurance companies, who take in the premiums (profits) but don’t pay out to the patients (underpaid workers)

I've always said that if you're making a profit and one good enough to pay for bonuses and 2-4% expansion then wonderful but to push the same people and machinery to do better every year for zero bonuses or investment is madness 😐😐

Nah. I'll never be DSA Never, ever. Capitalism worked fine until America refused to regulate it and control it. Many countries around the world have figured out a way to blend Socialism AND Capitalism and they are, by far, the most successful nations This level of nuance is beyond DSA

Communism is an economic system where the government owns industry and there is NO private enterprise. Its goal, never achieved, is an equal distribution of wealth. No one is advocating that. They want effective government that protects its citizens from the abuses of power and extreme wealth.

Those who hoard as much wealth as they can to the detriment of others are the tumour, slowly destroying the well-being of the body (the rest of us). Love the analogy. Uncontrolled growth is a pernicious danger.

If your point is that the pursuit of endlessly increasing profits, through escalating exploitation of workers and the natural world, is shortsighted and self-defeating, I don't disagree That doesn't stop capitalists from doing it tho, any more than it stops cancer cells from doing what they do

I’m all for socialism, but what’s often misunderstood about capitalist growth is that it’s not necessarily about physical resources. It’s just wringing more profit from any-bloody-thing including interpersonal relationships.