Amy Hoy: Pro Edition

Amy Hoy: Pro Edition

@amy.stackingthebricks.com

only srs biz content over here 👋 web - dev - design - saas - edu biz - copywriting - sales - ethics - rants if you're over 35, i probably taught you rails or javascript performance personal account @amyhoy.bsky.social

3.8K followers286 following557 posts

there's an oldish saying, "do you want to be right, or do you want to be effective?" and i think it needs an update "do you want to FEEL right, or do you want to be effective?" bc really there aren't any points at all for "being" right. only being effective matters.

Erika Hall@erikahall.bsky.social

What if they will never admit you're right, or even think you're right, but you can gain enough leverage to get them to do a good thing or stop doing harm?

men — and it is almost always men — don't do this. 1. i didn't ask for recommendations 2. those are NOT management theory books 3. i already own the book, trying to sell it to me like i've never heard of it is insulting 4. on no planet do i need a man to tell me what to read next

Jonathan Stephens@jonathanstephens.us

Feels like a perfect time to suggest @grimalkina.bsky.social's book Psychology of Software Teams: www.drcathicks.com Paired with @charity.wtf , @lizthegrey.com , and George Miranda's Observability Engineering (www.oreilly.com/library/view...) . Both big Next Reads, specifically b/c management.

i read management theory stuff for fun and if you think it's boring, you're wrong there's SO much tea. "Physicists, unlike accountants such as Deloitte, are educated to ask fundamental questions to understand the nature of things and to understand them in terms of energy and speed"

intelligentmanagement.wsWhy the Network of Projects is a Real and Operational Alternative to Deloitte’s ‘Adaptable Organization’the Network of Projects organization design is a real and operational alternative to Deloitte’s ‘Adaptable Organization’, based on systems science.

Amy Hoy: Pro Edition reposted

a product taking up space (in the abstract) nudges us to consider how much we need, or want, it. SaaS products are a perfect evasion of any sense of taking up space.

Amy Hoy: Pro Edition reposted

we have a rare window of availability at @codetv.dev, so if you're looking to make something special that helps your company connect with devs, now is a very good time to get in touch. I love working with teams that have the courage to experiment & take big swings — if that's you, get into my inbox!

got to use my “do you want to eat shit or shovel shit?”* line on a friend today who was talking about how much shit it’s taking to set up her first real business vs just freelancing * about being an employee or an entrepreneur

Amy Hoy: Pro Edition reposted

No one is ever completely “ready” for something difficult that they’ve never done before. So: Just start. But also: You know you’ll run into gaps, so realize that along the way, back off, get help, then get back to it.

Amy Hoy: Pro Edition reposted

the worst part about the github outages is that the engineers will probably take the blame when it’s more likely the managers’ faults it’s hard for me to imagine an engineer asking their manager to do a shittier job; these outages are usually downstream of management pressure to punt on quality

i have been violently allergic to "product LETS users" since the first time i heard it like bitch. YOU are a TOOL. you don't "let" me do anything.

dorian@doriantaylor.com

from this morning: the language of software vendors and how their products "let" users do this or that maybe instead of praising companies for what their products "let" us do, consider all the things we *could* be doing that they're holding out on youtu.be/VuJmz-H0pE8

You don’t understand scale. Use $50 to pay chatgpt for 10 feelings. In 6 months you have 250 feelings. Plant those into 250 morning scripts. 6 months you have 6,250 feelings. Seed them. 6 months you have 156k feelings. Seed them. 6 mo you have 3.9MM feelings. Sell them for $1 each.

this isn't cheating, and it's not "absolutely bizarre"! this is just how LLMs work. they are improv machines. they do not have any sense of truth or fiction bc they don't "know" anything. they can't even "know" if they "looked" at an "image." this is totally unsurprising

Eerke Boiten@eerkeboiten.bsky.social

And the top rating for AI cheating goes to: "In the most extreme case, our model achieved the top rank on a standard chest X-ray question-answering benchmark without access to any images." futurism.com/artificial-i...

View full thread

well maybe these researchers really are the dumb babies they sound like, bc llms don't EVER work by "diving into the data" and using "probability" that implies the llms analyze and calculate. and they can't! responses are dictated by statistical correlations between TOKENS in the CORPUS

this isn't cheating, and it's not "absolutely bizarre"! this is just how LLMs work. they are improv machines. they do not have any sense of truth or fiction bc they don't "know" anything. they can't even "know" if they "looked" at an "image." this is totally unsurprising

Eerke Boiten@eerkeboiten.bsky.social

And the top rating for AI cheating goes to: "In the most extreme case, our model achieved the top rank on a standard chest X-ray question-answering benchmark without access to any images." futurism.com/artificial-i...

the models generally "championed" for radiology are typically specialized, not commercial chatbots aka "frontier models" they still do the stupidest shit — like correlating diagnosis based on which hospital name was on the image — bc there's no such thing as artificial *intelligence*

i lol'd at this the way i lol'd when i first understood gödel's incompleteness theorem

Berna Devezer@devezer.bsky.social

📣 The difference between replicable and not replicable is not itself scientifically replicable. 📣 New work with Erkan Buzbas, showing that verdicts such as "X% of results replicated" are based on an inferential machinery that doesn't work. arxiv.org/abs/2604.26268

Amy Hoy: Pro Edition reposted

It's not that difficult or expensive to understand people if you really want to understand them. Many organizations prefer to spend huge amounts of money to keep that confirmation bias high going.

Amy Hoy: Pro Edition reposted

Forgot to mention: I’m running a 40% launch sale! But only for the first week. ⏰

Josh W. Comeau@joshwcomeau.com

🎉 Registration is now open for my latest course, Whimsical Animations! This course will teach you everything you need to know to design and build stunning, creative animations and interactions. It’s time to make the web less generic and boring! 😄

great thread, and also this is just the way things go: a variety of small, indie biz pave the way -> megacorps acquire and fuck em up -> users tolerate -> gets worse -> users revolt -> a variety of small, indie biz pave the way market concentration is bad, & it's also fragile

jenn da joker@jennschiffer.com

people will need to embrace small biz to afford these services, which they’ll need more than ever thanks to ai, which opens the door to (hopefully) more independently owned alternatives. you will just need to get used to paying for software like you do patreons/newsletter— but for a mutual vs adobe

Amy Hoy: Pro Edition reposted

Replying to @jennschiffer.com

people will need to embrace small biz to afford these services, which they’ll need more than ever thanks to ai, which opens the door to (hopefully) more independently owned alternatives. you will just need to get used to paying for software like you do patreons/newsletter— but for a mutual vs adobe

Amy Hoy: Pro Edition reposted

for the last 3 years Microsoft has basically been covering their products knee-deep in shit and now we customers have to ladle out the shit with tiny spoons that Microsoft sells us and we have to read whiny blog posts about how they could not have foreseen this and also spoons will triple in price

Amy Hoy: Pro Edition reposted

we have empirical proof that posting is one of the only human endeavors you can approach with both infinite time and money and never get any better at. the last truly expert domain

William B. Fuckley@opinionhaver.bsky.social

something sort of insane is that we have non-trivial evidence that posting is the top of all possible hierarchies of needs. some of the richest men in the world who could be on their mega-yachts choose to not only post, but orient their lives around posting related things

i knew the github guys well before they made github. this whole arc has been wild to watch.

spooky tail latency@bluespacecanary.bsky.social

microsoft may actually have managed mismanage github so badly that it loses its effective monopoly despite none of its aspiring competitors being remotely prepared to replace it. incredible

this is, frankly, the best argument that llms are actually sentient* the intro is weird but the magic starts at 0:17 *THIS IS A JOKE. ALERT: THIS IS A JOKE.

ompuco@ompu.co

found a whole operation of unmanned youtube channels making completely unchecked long form slop videos where the ai voice simulacra regularly trips up & does this for a full ten minutes every time. all the very legit comments are like "NO! THATS NOT TRUE! YOU LIE HE DID NOT" & never acknowledge it.

i recently thought i finally landed on a solution to my "which camera do i get for deep infrared??" dilemma and bought a pre-converted ~830nm oly e-m5 mk ii from mpb but it was weirdly heavy, off-balance, & the evf was smeared. so back it went. now i am back where i started, but more annoyed

m43: THEORETICALLY pocketable, but i have to buy a small body to convert ($400-500 + conversion) aps-c: i have a bare sensor samsung nx2000 which is great except it's faulty. it weighs 200g less than the e-m5! lenses are bigger, but not THAT much. i have an nx300 to convert for ~$300 ???