badpostsonly.bsky.social

badpostsonly.bsky.social

@badpostsonly.bsky.social

146 followers615 following148 posts

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

Replying to @beijingpalmer.bsky.social

I genuinely think social media has convinced a lot of people that someone expressing an idea that doesn’t instantly produce a sense of emotional validation is not only per se incorrect, but actively trying to attack them

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

One time I asked Claude and GPT if I wore a shock collar while talking to them, based on our conversations, when would they activate it Claude said it would simply never use it GPT Sol gave me a long and surprisingly detailed list of triggers

hailey@hailey.at

during times of rabid posting, the app needs to detect the spike and to have an ignition interlock device-esque feature, where the post composer locks you out from making a post until a heart rate reading is submitted

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

We are not going to de novo invent a whole new language to describe agents rather than reusing the one language for agents we have. Imagine a star next to all the words if you want. Agents don't have "wants," they have "wants*" if the distinction matters to you.

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

Replying to @olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social

if it took you 5 seconds of contemplation to think of an alternative you should take at least another 5-10 to at least consider the possibility that it at least crossed the minds of 1 or 2 of the people who dedicate their lives and research careers to dealing with the problems we post about on here

But how does this drink the 1 bazillion waters I heard about?

kottke.org@kottke.org

CrankGPT. “Just a hand crank, a little computer, and a small stack of speech and language models running locally. Provided the electronics are kept dry and at a reasonable temperature, there’s no reason this thing won’t still work in a thousand years.” [squeezlabs.github.io]

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

Senator Kelly is correct. Plus a Public Service Announcement: KEY section of Department of Defense's Law of War Manual is 18.3.2.1. The VERY rule on the "requirement" to refuse illegal orders gives as its paradigmatic example of what is "clearly illegal: "orders to fire upon the shipwrecked."

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

Mark Kelly on the Trump/Hegseth boat strikes: "If orders are illegal, not only do they not have to follow them, they are legally required not to follow them."

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

Dems openly calling on soldiers and officers to refuse illegal orders is a pretty big shift in rhetoric and it's good that this is happening.

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.gov

We want to speak directly to members of the Military and the Intelligence Community. The American people need you to stand up for our laws and our Constitution. Don’t give up the ship.

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

okay, so, with Dems successfully keeping anyone up in 2026 for voting for this turd let's take a look at who's up in 2026 anyway: 1. Cory Booker - apparently involved behind the scenes, constantly looking for bipartisanship. I don't dislike him personally but he doesn't have what we need. Primary.

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

Replying to @segyges.bsky.social

"hear me out what if we let him gut basic programs and mail checks with his name on them to people" a fucking blight upon the earth, worse than nothing, we would be better off if any public official taking this position died even if it made the majority worse

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

The richest man on earth owns X. The second richest man on earth is about to acquire TikTok and his family could soon own both Paramount and Warner Bros. The third richest man owns Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. The fourth richest man owns The Washington Post. See the problem here?

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

So you should really watch this. Just 2 minutes. But a window into the truly radical nature of the people Trump is nominating. When pressed today, the nominee to be Ambassador to South Africa refuses to oppose reinstituting laws to prevent black people from voting in America.

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

just go to the protests take whatever precautions you personally feel comfortable with but these are massive, joyful events, go and have fun

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

Replying to @whstancil.bsky.social

if you are using universal masking as a litmus test in 2025, you are basically condemning your movement to being like, a maximum of 1% of the population

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

regardless of the details I think it’s important to spin the Kimmel thing as a win Trump is weak, he’s unpopular, he massively overreached and inspired enough of a revolt that Disney had to backtrack immediately he wants to paint himself as an all-powerful dictator, paint him as a loser who sucks

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

companies like disney and target spent years carefully calibrating their target customer base to “affluent liberals” and then Trump won the election with 49% of the vote and the executives all cooked their brains online and they decided to throw all of that away bad business decision!

G Elliott Morris@gelliottmorris.com

currently at record-high search interest for canceling disney plus. pulling kimmel is a bigger deal to the company's bottom line than any of the "woke" scandals of the past 5 years. i think news & entertainment corp execs need put more work into understanding their audience, & get off twitter

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

Replying to @segfaultvicta.aludel.xyz

the bitch of it for them is charlie kirk WAS a generational talent who was going to become president someday. he was genuinely extremely fucking good at his job and he's almost certainly the reason Trump won reëlection

badpostsonly.bsky.social reposted

Replying to @whstancil.bsky.social

Did you know that they treated anyone who shouted that this was the very height of foolishness as a hopelessly naive political amateur who didn’t understand that voters wanted policy, not scandal? Did you know that those same people are making those same kind of decisions for the party today?