Gary Lupyan

Gary Lupyan

@glupyan.bsky.social

1.9K followers183 following540 posts

Would be nice to get the authors to tell us what they were thinking. Do they really just not give a shit? Have the norms shifted that much? Am I just naive?

Gautam Kamath@gautamkamath.com

How do you tell if authors fabricated their research results? Sometimes: they just tell you. Read, e.g., this caption carefully. Another banger of a post by my friend Nihar B. Shah on his blog, where he found at least 20+ such #ICLR2027 submissions: researchonresearch.blog/2026/10/20/s...

Gary Lupyan reposted

Sydney Sweeney reveals in an interview that she doesn’t care about the PHP vulnerability because she moved everything to Rust in 2024. “They said the rewrite would take six months. We’re on month 30. We haven’t shipped a feature since, but I’m having a very normal Wednesday.”

Gary Lupyan reposted

I am pleased to share this article written with Marc Feldman that reviews the history of scientific racism and biological race realism, through the lens of two recent books: Hochman’s The Race Illusion and Lorusso & Winther’s Remapping Race in a Global Context. academic.oup.com/bioscience/a...

academic.oup.comThe “zombie science” of biological race realismReview of Adam Hochman’s The Race Illusion and Lorusso and Winther’s Remapping Race in a Global Context.

My university is pushing "quantum" for social science (and humanities!??). I have no idea what this means, but they keep trying to get us to come to these meetings. Does anyone have any idea what they're talking about?

Gary Lupyan reposted

So, advice for potential PhD students re emailing potential supervisors to connect with them. 1) Do not use AI. Like seriously, don't. It's a Dunning-Kruger issue ... your email might look good to you, but for those of us in our fields AND getting a million of these, the generic language is OBVIOUS

Gary Lupyan reposted

UT Linguistics'll have 4 (!) computational linguists! Consider applying! I'm looking for students and also potentially postdocs. For postdocs, particularly interested in philosophically rich issues around AI cognition: Can AI introspect? How can we study if they have preferences?

Lindia Tjuatja@lindiatjuatja.bsky.social

The UT comp ling faculty (@jessyjli.bsky.social @kanishka.bsky.social @kmahowald.bsky.social & myself) are looking for PhD students to join us! sites.utexas.edu/compling/ 🤘 We are an interdisciplinary group with interests across linguistics, cogsci and NLP. Apply by 12/1:

Gary Lupyan reposted

testing astra's parametric modeling capabilities by asking it to reconstruct these marble maze pieces from reference photos, and then use them in threejs to make a marble maze builder with box3d physics.

I think they mean the median bluesky user

indeed so shall I play strike@curiousaboutupdog.bsky.social

i simply do not believe that the mean bluesky user is sophisticated enough to debate which moments of an unknown probability distribution best describe certain things about that distribution

Gary Lupyan reposted

So we fly a pride flag in our front yard in a very conservative neighborhood and it’s been there for the last few years. Someone put this in our mailbox and my goodness…

Do LLMs reason by pattern matching? Why, yes they do! But as we argue here, so do people! @zstuddiford.bsky.social started this work 4 years ago when he was a freshman in my lab. Zach is now at UCSD w/ Ben Bergen and I couldn't be more proud of him and of this project. Have a look!

Zach Studdiford@zstuddiford.bsky.social

Simple mistakes in LLM reasoning might suggest that models are *pattern matching*, not reasoning. But what if people are doing the same thing? In my preprint with @glupyan, we find that LLMs are highly aligned with people *because* they are pattern matching! A thread🧵(1/15):

I suspect most people on here still don't quite get how far casual use of agent harnesses has come in the last 6 months.. What took many months now takes minutes & in this case delivered as human understandable code, interactive figures and stats.

Using transformers to test alternative explanations of old behavioral effects has been a huge boost to my conceptual understanding. My bar for understanding is getting higher even as I am fighting off temptations of cognitive surrender.

Gary Lupyan reposted

🚨 New paper 🚨 Are your participants using AI to take your study? We conducted the first study directly observing AI assistance in online research, spanning 700K+ Prolific submissions. We found very rare, concentrated AI use, but gaps in safeguards. arxiv.org/abs/2610.09279

Gary Lupyan reposted

Not in math, but I found this very worth reading. I suspect most academics are going to confront similar questions before the 20s are out.

John Lake@jlake9.bsky.social

1/ Timothy Gowers shares Kevin Buzzard's "To grieve, or not to grieve?", on AI-for-math progress and what mathematicians should mourn or embrace. X: https://x.com/wtgowers/status/2106424761656148345 Essay: https://xenaproject.wordpress.com/2026/10/01/to-grieve-or-not-to-grieve/

Gary Lupyan reposted

There's growing experimental evidence¹˒²˒³˒⁴ that LLMs are unusually good at talking people out of entrenched false beliefs and conspiracy theories. ¹ pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39264999/ ² pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41179846/ ³ sciety.org/articles/act... ⁴ connecticut.adl.org/resources/re...

Der Fisher@blackholefun.bsky.social

Unpopular opinion: LLMs are generally deradicalizing people whose beliefs are based on pure propaganda. I've been watching this happen slowly with some people I care about. ChatGPT is one of the reasons they finally accept that the NRA, OAN, and NewsMax are lying to them.

So rare to see a behavioral effect so fundamental these days. ❤️

Ken Paller@paller.bsky.social

Did you know that your speed — in a simple task of quickly pressing a button every time you see a yellow square — is faster when you are exhaling or pausing then when you are inhaling? Dr. Erika Yamazaki figured this out, did all the work, and published on it this week www.cell.com/iscience/ful...

Gary Lupyan reposted

Academia is full of horrible stuff, but some lines in the sand still hold and should be actively maintained. Open harassment in response to less than fully deferential treatment of senior academics is such a line.

Jeremy Pober-geist 👻@jpober.bsky.social

In what world do you think this is acceptable behavior? Scouring bluesky for months-old replies so you, with tenure, could put a postdoc on blast in the name of...what? Because I think AI's lack consciousness for different reasons than yours? Or are you just trawling for academics who look like me?

Gary Lupyan reposted

I really do not like the recent push against anthropomorphic language

Andy Masley@andymasley.bsky.social

This is the first part of a 2 part post on why I believe that current AI models meet my criteria for really "thinking" and "understanding," and that prohibitions on using these words because they "anthropomorphize" AI seem philosophically confused to me. blog.andymasley.com/p/why-i-beli...

Welp, there’s that. Considering that learning even simple rules is exceedingly difficult for *5 year olds*, we really shouldn’t be surprised.

ingmarvisser.bsky.social@ingmarvisser.bsky.social

New paper 🍼📄 ManyBabies 3 is out (open access, registered report in Developmental Science). 30 labs, 33 languages, 839 infants set out to replicate a textbook finding: 7-month-olds learn abstract rules from speech (@garymarcus.bsky.social et al., 1999). We didn’t find it. 🧵

Gary Lupyan reposted

My God, I can actually give Opus 5.5 open ended assignments like "make this code run as fast as its C equivalent, or tell me why it can't be done" and leave it for several hours -- and it actually works and has done the job. And not by cheating with cgo either.

Gary Lupyan reposted

How do philosophers and scientists of mind actually work together, and where does the collaboration break down? ISPSM is launching In Conversation, a new online series that aims to bring philosophers and scientists together to work through questions like these. 📅 23 Oct 2026, 1pm BST/8am EDT

Gary Lupyan reposted

This is the far more likely pathway for how AI will end us all, btw. Not via some superintelligent swarm of paperclip maximizers, but by a cascading sequence of dumb fuckups driven by human beings who have arranged things to be fast-moving and catastrophically fragile while also being really lazy.

Kieran Healy@kjhealy.co

That’s a load-bearing assumption, Dr Strangelove. www.cnn.com/2026/09/18/p...

Reading the TiCS paper by @initself.bsky.social et al., reminded me of the debates around Hoffman et al's interface theory from a decade ago. I think my commentary on it featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/interfacethe... struck a similarly Umwelt-oriented position w/ sprinkles of predictive coding

featuredcontent.psychonomic.org#interfacetheory: True enoughIn 1625, the astronomer Christopher Scheiner confirmed Johann Kepler’s hunch that images projected to the retina through the crystalline lens of the eye, much like images passed through telescope l…
Gary Lupyan@glupyan.bsky.social

Yes, exactly. Platonic representations are one of the many erroneous conclusions reached under the assumption that intelligence is a one-dimensional scalar.

Yes, exactly. Platonic representations are one of the many erroneous conclusions reached under the assumption that intelligence is a one-dimensional scalar.

This post is unavailable.

Gary Lupyan reposted

To tell if a maze is solvable, just hang it by its corners If it tears into pieces, you’ve found a solution

Gary Lupyan reposted

We are hiring a full professor for "Intelligence in biological and artificial systems". If you don't know about the German system yet, let me tell you a little bit about working as a professor at the institute. Thread 👇

Tim Kietzmann @timkietzmann.bsky.social

📢 We are hiring a full professor in "Intelligence in Biological and Artificial Systems". Come join us at Germany's first and largest cognitive science program. Please share far and wide, and get in touch with any questions. www.uni-osnabrueck.de/en/universit...

Seeing people who don’t understand what’s happening calling for executions of those responsible

Matthew Kollmer@matthewkollmer.com

This "AI destroys rare books" news has effectively broken the Rare Books feed How to tell ppl that when rare booksellers & special collections talk about rare books, we don't just mean out-of-print? Like, Amazon isn't destroying the books folks associate with mahogany shelves in lavish bookshops?

Gary Lupyan reposted

thanks Daniel for this v useful guide.

Daniel Lakens@lakens.bsky.social

New Blog post: Which Data Repository Should you Use? In light of OSF closing down, I compare Zenodo, Dataverse, ResearchBox, PsychArchive, and local repositories on six important dimensions. If you want to know which to pick: It depends! daniellakens.blogspot.com/2026/08/whic...

Gary Lupyan reposted

Incredible. When E—n M—k & his crew obliterated USAID in a weekend, they deleted a vast trove of publicly-funded knowledge: the Development Experience Clearinghouse. A Canadian high school student (!) happened to have downloaded the entire thing for a project. AidData has now posted it for all.

aiddata.orgBefore reimagining development data, remember what we’ve learnedWhy we’re publishing a free, searchable, and ungated archive featuring a quarter-century of USAID evaluation reports.

glad that more people are having that realization! it’s a bitter pill but the sooner we swallow it the more predictive the discourse around AI becomes.

Matt Steinglass@mattsteinglass.bsky.social

Maybe that is a very misplaced stance, but my instinct is to question the presumption that I or humans in general are special. Clearly there are huge differences between what AIs do and what humans do, but it also seems wrong to say that an LLM is "merely mimicking". Functionally, that is not true.