polecopub

polecopub

@polecopub.bsky.social

The bluesky account where academic publications are treated as social, political, technical and economic objects #STS #Openscience #PoliticalEconomy Blog: https://polecopub.hypotheses.org/ Matilda scientifc director: https://matilda.science/?l=en

961 followers369 following599 posts

When I was a kid, only national elections were really followed and discussed (yet, US presidential ones were often commented). Now, in one night, we follow live reports from Serbia and Brazil like their own citizens.

polecopub reposted

I've kept track of review invites I receive each year since 2018. I've had 3 review requests this week alone - and I think something like 50 this year to date. By the end of the year, I'll break my record for review invitations by some margin (estimate of 66+ in 2026 vs 56 in 2020). 1/

Already in chapter 1. A must read on the social history of #peerreview, #reviewers and #referees

Melinda Baldwin@mbaldwin.bsky.social

I am absolutely delighted to announce that the open access version of "In Referees We Trust? How Peer Review Became a Mark of Scientific Legitimacy" is now live! Want to know more about how scholars' lives came to be ruled by Reviewer 2? Download the book FREE at: direct.mit.edu/books/monogr...

polecopub reposted

85% of #OA journals in sociology & political science are #DiamondOpenAccess #DOA. They lag behind Gold #OpenAccess in technical standards, visibility & citation impact—but more often let authors retain copyright. Read the study by Joachim Schöpfel and me: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

doi.orgStructural Challenges of Diamond Open Access in the Social Sciences: Insights from DOAJ and Scimago DataDiamond Open Access is considered a more equitable and sustainable alternative to APC-based and subscription-based publishing models and is particularly prominent in the Social Sciences. This article ...

polecopub reposted

Banned Books Week is almost over! The Trump administration had at least 596 books removed from schools serving military families. Don’t forget to get out there and read some of the books they tried to keep off the shelves. Happy Banned Books Week!

The redefinition of authorship. I love "a human author" which seems to reject collective authorship And publisher work. Not mentioning many non-humans (computers, printers, multiple software,...) were involved into the "creation" of "your book".

Victoria Strauss@victoriastrauss.com

Canada is refusing to issue ISBNs to books primarily generated with AI. This illustrates both the urgency of the problem of the growing flood of slop books, and also the toothlessness of addressing it on the honor system without there also being consequences for lying

That is the new normal: in some cases, fake data open to publish, in others genuine #opendata "analyzed" by #GenAI to quickly publish crap. 50 years ago, "sloppy and dirty science" already existed (see Latour's portrait of a biologist as a capitalist), it has become "clean" fake science.

Neuroskeptic@neuroskeptic.bsky.social

This is a disturbing story - two published neuroscience papers that were seemingly completed AI generated retractionwatch.com/2026/10/01/o... It was only detected because of a vigilant peer reviewer on a third submission @deevybee.bsky.social.

Inflation is everywhere, except at @crossref.bsky.social #openscience #opendata

Crossref@crossref.org

Key decisions our current board has made: lowering DOI registration fees doi.org/10.64000/nvf... & rebuilding the Crossref system doi.org/10.64000/enn... Meet the candidates standing for election 👉 bit.ly/4jbgK6A. Who will represent you? 🗳️Vote by 22 Oct 2026 #Crossref2026

The never ending catastrophe of #GenAI in academia: #openscience infrastructures forced to close just to be able to survive. After limitations on review papers, limitations on new authors, limitations on the number of posted preprints.

arXiv@arxiv.bsky.social

arXiv has updated our policy on rate limiting for all submitters. This update was made to fairly distribute moderator time & support the arXiv community of staff, volunteers, readers & authors. Please read our announcement to learn more: https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/updated-rate-limit-policy/

polecopub reposted

Replying to @petersuber.bsky.social

Update. I have no plans to write a retrospective essay on #OATP ( @oatp.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy ). But I've started writing up some Tagging Principles that I learned from OATP. It's a work-in-progress and I welcome comments. docs.google.com/document/d/1... #Folksonomy #Ontology #Tagging

docs.google.comTagging PrinciplesTagging Principles Peter Suber I’m still revising this piece and welcome comments. When the revisions taper off, I’ll probably try to publish it. Since it’s longer than an article and shorter than a b...

The cost of knowledge unproduced.

Bart Penders@penders.bsky.social

Back of the envelope calculations: 3600 years of research time went into the collective application process. The research will fund 3200 years of research. We are 400 research years poorer as a result of this. 1/2

polecopub reposted

They already are, see SocArxiv posts for moderation nightmare. And of cours chemistry and biology crap have been there for quite some time through paper mills or more amateurish sources. You can "publish" a systematic review of any given discipline, full of crap of course, but that looks legitimate.

Richard Sever@richardsever.bsky.social

"All corners of academia will soon be flooded with AI-generated research....Maths and CS go first because their entire output is symbol manipulation...Biology comes later not because biologists are cleverer but because the rate-limiting step is physical" giorgio.gilest.ro/the-weimar-o...

polecopub reposted

When we talk about the costs that LLMs impose on society we should not forget the fact that nothing works anymore because everyone is so scared of getting their shit scraped. I can't even use google scholar from my university or starlink because they send too much traffic.

A classical example of centralized/decentralized French HER system. ABES negotiates and define standards, thousands of librarians/curators in hundreds of différent HER institutions daily work on metadata #openscience

polecopub reposted

Do people understand that this is just starting? The US Gov declining only means that we are now carrying this forward ourselves. I have had a few conversations with folks that thought this meant the case was over.

Juan Pablo Alperin@juancommander.scholcommlab.ca

1/ In 2024, I filed a false claims act lawsuit against Elsevier, Springer, Wiley & Informa alleging they systematically overcharged US federal grants for article processing. The gov declined to intervene and now it's public. Some thoughts on what this is, and what it isn't:

polecopub reposted

A "good faith agreement": you work for me without compensation, you shape authors and reveiwers into slave workers and I decide whatever I wish because I own the title and the technical platforms #predatorypublishing #peerreview

This post is unavailable.

Sometimes we forget how much joy you can get by performing simple research tasks. As a sociologist, having a pair of really nice interviews with food for thought is such a pleasure.

@petersuber should be thanked for decades of engagement and work for the #openaccess #openscience community.

petersuber@petersuber.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy

This is the last month of activity for the Open Access Tracking Project (#OATP, @oatp). September 30, 2026, will be the last day of tagging and updates. The Harvard instance of #TagTeam -- the #OpenSource tagging platform on which OATP ran -- will start winding down soon after. But the code […]

polecopub reposted

Race scientists are like asbestos: unwisely built into the fabric of universities many years ago, will absolutely kill people, and require careful but total removal. Also, mostly harmless if embedded in concrete.

polecopub reposted

Dean of Science at Stellenbosch University writes that although AI generates almost all the words for his articles (including this one): "AI did almost all of the writing. I remain the expert and the thought leader behind the piece." www.nature.com/articles/d44...

nature.comWhen AI writes the words, who is the author?After an AI detector classified one of my opinion pieces as entirely AI-generated, I found myself questioning where authorship ends, where expertise begins and what readers deserve to know.

polecopub reposted

polecopub reposted

1. Recently I’ve received lots of emails from people I don’t know personally, asking for my feedback on their books or papers. They explain the connection between my work and theirs and ask me to take a look. The catch, of course, is that the emails are transparently, obviously, written by AI.

A very interesting case in sociology of #ignorance. Science bigotry pushes a journal not to consider evidence given in court (and public knowledge) that the data was biased by the very company making the drug. It won't retract it, then allow it to be cited in other papers and clinical guidelines.

Retraction Watch@retractionwatch.com

The request — which initially included two of the paper’s original authors — stems from 19-year-old court records revealing the sponsor of the study withheld evidence about opioid withdrawal that contradicted the paper’s conclusions.

Most people don't realize how large-scale disciplines work: I had never heard of Jason Arday before last week (same for Claudine Gay before the public discussions) and most authors/refs that US/UK sociologists point out are completely unknown to me. Of course, it works both ways. (1/3)

Even if it may be a deeper phenomenon in some HSS,, you'll find the same pattern in most STEM: sub-sub disciplines live their own lives ignoring most of what is happening elsewhere (would it be in research practices, norms or results themselves) (2/3)

Some colleagues are very good at making import/export science, shifting some well-know stuff to other parts of the academia (and may pretending these things are new and their own). Beyond their own personal recognition, their moves are important in science dissemination inside the academia (3/3)

A very insightful post on how #researchmisconduct inquiries happen (and diverge). IMHO, the only oddities in Arday's case are his weird extra-academic claims (charities, sport...) and the fact that he resigned so quickly. #researchintegrity #peerreview

James Smoliga, DVM, PhD@jsmoliga.bsky.social

The Jason Arday case may seem highly unusual. But the reality is it follows a typical pattern found within academic cases of plagiarism and research misconduct. Check out my new piece, which provides further context to Arday’s case. academiclife.substack.com/p/how-do-aca...