Ted Palenski

Ted Palenski

@tedpal.bsky.social

PhD candidate at Glasgow University • Working on ethnographies, data justice, and sociomaterial approaches to research

307 followers223 following323 posts

Ted Palenski reposted

Replying to @ethanz.bsky.social

"The problem is not devices. It's not screens. It's not social media." A radically different social media wouldn't be harming us this way if our grandmothers invented them - they'd urge us to call home. It's the business model that's harming us. #attention2026

Ted Palenski reposted

Carolyn Marvin, one of my mentors and committee members ❤️ If you haven‘t read When Old Technologies Were New, do your yourself a favor!

We must, however, also make sure we teach critical compressed air thruster literacy (CCATL), so that students learn to fly responsibly, while obviously reaching new heights* of learning. *heights made only imaginable thanks to the innovative thinking of the 1960s cartoon the Jetsons.

Ted McCormick@tedmccormick.bsky.social

I’m sorry to have to be the bad guy here but we need to recognize that we live in a compressed air thrusters world now. If you’re not finding ways to teach the critical use of compressed air thrusters in your classroom, you’re setting your students up to fail when you could be setting them up to fly

Learning as expression — a social, relational act. I do wonder what kinds of space we will see made for it. I can certainly imagine all sorts of tech solutions that do not lead to the outcomes we would hope and instead solve the ‘problem’ via ‘personalised oracy edtech’.

Sue Cowley@suecowley.bsky.social

It's interesting to watch the reactions to a push on oracy because focusing on oracy requires us to make space for children and young people's voices to be heard. It needs agency and chances to talk with peers which aren't really a feature of the system atm. Learning as expression, not just memory.

I can imagine a lot of very terrible edtech solutions that have individual students speaking to LLMs that allow for the continuation of the status quo. There is no depth to the degree that companies will go to capitalise off the problem.

Ted Palenski reposted

I will be eternally grateful to have been born in a literate culture where literacy was valued and expected and I still had the time, attention, and freedom to develop a literacy practice. Understanding context, inference, vocabulary, perspective, affect — all powerful, useful skills and values.

So refreshing to hear critiques of (gen) AI that start from the idea of interdependence. 'Cognitive offloading' may be a concern, but it is one that can be dealt with via 'critical intervention' at the level of the individual. I shy away from this idea, especially as it continues to circulate

CyborgGoddess.bsky.social@cyborggoddess.bsky.social

Thank you so much @melhogan.bsky.social for the chance to share my research on relationships with AI and ethics of care. I really enjoyed our conversation! shows.acast.com/the-data-fix...

View full thread

contrast to 'cognitive offloading' which feels increasingly empty and which does not really address what's at stake. Valuing (and protection) forms of attention and forms of attentiveness are absolutely vital to living better, with each other, especially in education. Well worth a listen!

It's also very nice to be able to deepen my own critiques as I write up the PhD, while also making new connections and creating new resonances that will extend well beyond submission. (Now I need to read Lindemann's book but I will wait until post-submission...)

So refreshing to hear critiques of (gen) AI that start from the idea of interdependence. 'Cognitive offloading' may be a concern, but it is one that can be dealt with via 'critical intervention' at the level of the individual. I shy away from this idea, especially as it continues to circulate

CyborgGoddess.bsky.social@cyborggoddess.bsky.social

Thank you so much @melhogan.bsky.social for the chance to share my research on relationships with AI and ethics of care. I really enjoyed our conversation! shows.acast.com/the-data-fix...

we can value all of things things separately. writing is a very flexible technology. it's so odd to me that we have to writhe and contort ourselves to adjust teaching and learning in the 'age of ai' when ai is supposed to be some magically flexible technology.

This post is unavailable.

i think it's mostly that the biggest advocates of gen ai are the ones least interesting in writing for writing's sake -- or really for any other reason but accumulation of capital

It's even worse when it comes to schools. So many Qs: (1) What is 'AI'? (2) What does 'use' mean in terms of frequency? (3) ... in terms of specific tasks? (4) How is 'use' distributed across an organisation? (5) What are possible secondary effects of such 'use' in workflows within organisations?

This post is unavailable.
View full thread

I would really like orgs to collectively think about what kinds of time they need to meet their medium and long-term goals. For orgs with social purposes (e.g. schools, unis, care facilities) it would be nice to shift the focus from saving time to *making* time and then see what tech might do

TBH these high-level 'use' statistics, where the terms are intentionally under-defined, are only useful as forms of marketing for similarly under-specified uses cases. They seem to worsen structural problems by further shifting the responsibility for said problems onto individuals w/ the least power

It's even worse when it comes to schools. So many Qs: (1) What is 'AI'? (2) What does 'use' mean in terms of frequency? (3) ... in terms of specific tasks? (4) How is 'use' distributed across an organisation? (5) What are possible secondary effects of such 'use' in workflows within organisations?

This post is unavailable.

(6) What forms of experience and expertise become less valued as a result? And the question that nobody seems to care about: (7) What are the long-term effects of the de- and re-valuation?

This seems especially relevant when the discourse is all about efficiency and narrow views of saving time. This is all backwards IMO, especially as I near the end of the PhD. Time is imagined to be some sort of tradeable resource: shaving off a minute here or there leads to transformation. Magic!

Ted Palenski reposted

Amazing turn out from students and staff at the University of Edinburgh, in protest at senior management's greed and manufactured cuts. This is what solidarity looks like - as our campaign of industrial action begins this coming week in protest at the cuts. www.ucuedinburgh.org.uk/blog/student...

ucuedinburgh.org.uk900+ at inaugural Student & Staff Assembly! — UCU EdinburghMore than 900 students and staff gathered for the inaugural Student-Staff Assembly on Thursday 24 September.

Ted Palenski reposted

Just when I think I can’t hate OpenAI and Sam Altman any more, new details come out about how ChatGPT helped a shooter plan one of the worst mass shootings in Canadian history in Tumbler Ridge, BC. OpenAI made an explicit decision not to report the user to authorities.

motherjones.comChatGPT helped the Tumbler Ridge school shooter focus on guns, tactics, and terror, our investigation revealsOpenAI’s chatbot fed the shooter’s violent fantasies and planning up to the massacre.

Exactly this. Textbook example of what Joan Tronto calls “privileged irresponsibility.” All your everyday needs are met so you couldn’t possibly imagine the value of the work it takes to meet those needs.

This post is unavailable.

Ted Palenski reposted

Ted Palenski reposted

Exactly. How often are young people told: “If the product is free, you are the product”? This was also a business strategy during Covid. It is plain as day yet here we are, again. Groundhog Day ad nauseam.

Marcus Luther@marcusluther.bsky.social

These large tech companies giving free premium AI access for K-12 teachers is not about improving student learning. It's about market capture. It's about future profits. Don't forget that.

Ted Palenski reposted

We’ve opened the call for @britishacademy.bsky.social Postdoctoral Fellowships. We provide 3 years of funding to early-career researchers in the humanities and social sciences wishing to pursue an independent research project. Apply by 30th September www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/funding/sche...

thebritishacademy.ac.ukPostdoctoral FellowshipsThe British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowships is a three year award made to an annual cohort of outstanding early career researchers in the humanities or social sciences.

Ted Palenski reposted

one of the many, many reasons I love owning books is that they're the last bastion of physical media that corporations can neither digitally repossess nor render technologically inaccessible due to regionlocking, subscription changes or phasing out the relevant device. you buy a book and it's YOURS

This post is unavailable.

Everybody will be delighted to know that some very rich men are encouraging young people to do philosophy, major in the liberal arts, develop creativity and develop hobbies, since these people will 'benefit most' from genAI. www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/... #pairedtext

bbc.co.ukGoogle, Nvidia and Anthropic bosses' AI tips for studentsSundar Pichai, Jensen Huang and Jack Clark share their advice with the BBC.
becimay@becimay.bsky.social

In case you didn’t know, Exeter uni, where I work, has announced a plan to make 25% of staff in my English department redundant. Left-over staff will do double the teaching while their research time will be shrunk to 1%. Meanwhile admissions for English at Exeter are HIGH, and on the rise this year

Ted Palenski reposted

NIH grants have been under political scrutiny since early 2025. But what does the screening process actually look like? What is being flagged? I spent a month digging into leaked docs and emails. We've published the 235-word list that are being flagged by an internal AI tool. And so much more. 🧵

nature.comInside the new political screening that’s stalling NIH grantsMandatory reviews by top health officials and checks for 235 disfavoured terms have left hundreds of vetted grant applications in administrative limbo.

Wild. The limits of automation on full display, and the chaos that is modern academic publishing.

Mark Peifer (He, him)@peiferlabunc.bsky.social

Truly bizarre story of how two papers from the 1940s by physics pioneer Max Planck have been "retracted" from Naturwissenschaften, potentially by an algorithm, for anachronistic "plagiarism" issues, leaving the current editor baffled (but it is Springer Nature so.... www.science.org/content/arti...

Ted Palenski reposted

I understand the excitement about technology “rediscovering lost texts.” I do, & I get the media hype. But I wish people knew that there are hundreds of thousands of “lost” texts just sitting in manuscripts in libraries, which have never been published outside of those single manuscripts. 1/n

Sonja Drimmer@sonjadrimmer.bsky.social

What I said here about an earlier project still holds. 2/n bsky.app/profile/sonj...

Also, the Obergefell ruling came 11 years after my home state, Massachusetts, legalized same-sex marriage. Much nicer anniversary than the Brexit referendum.

FactPost@factpostnews.bsky.social

Today is the 11-year anniversary of Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark Supreme Court case legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide.

Ted Palenski reposted

Watching BBC News and they just did 5 minutes with a doctor about how this heatwave is life threatening and the interviewer closed it with "well, it's just an opportunity to have ice cream for breakfast!!". Amazing clip of how the BBC seems just blissfully unaware of what is happening

Reason #3743 not to use LLMs for lit reviews. Or for universities or research orgs to offer trainings for such a use. I am still angry about a training I saw earlier this year. Absolutely no criticality on display. After I emailed a list of reasons why I found the whole idea unacceptable.

Mel Andrews@bayesianboy.bsky.social

When utilized in literature review, LLMs consistently 1. fail to mention female authors in female-led literatures, 2. insist that men are more influential or more heavily cited when this is contradicted by objective citation counts, and 3. attribute women’s work to hallucinated male scholars.