(((John))) is mad on the Internet

(((John))) is mad on the Internet

@tehoriman.bsky.social

StayNJ's greatest enemy. I yell into the void of Bluesky. Didgeridooer of Hullabaloos I will never know peace, but you will never know joy.

511 followers282 following8.7K posts

Doing some math, this is a 16% swing from 2024. If you do that evenly: Norcross+34 Van Drew+1 Conaway+25 Smith+20 Gottheimer+27 Pallone+32 Bennett+11 Menendez+41 Pou+21 McIver+68 Mejia+31 Hamawy+41 But I suspect that it'll actually hit harder in 2/4/7 than elsewhere in the state.

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

looked at in longer perspective, it's striking how much this resembles the premodern system of exclusion, rents, and personalist connections, which was--and this part's important--radically worse than the modern system of impersonal rules and general taxation

Boston’s chief planner is a true believer in the San Francisco model, in which you make it impossible to profitably build apartments by-right so developers are forced into a politicized discretionary negotiation with the city, which relaxes the rules in exchange for below-market units.

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

There are only two explanations for the NYT's habit of presenting GOP operatives and donors as true swing voters: 1. Their reporters and editors are somehow incapable of running a simple Google searches, showing just a staggering level of journalistic incompetence 2. They want to the GOP to win

This post is unavailable.

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

Samantha Brennan@samanthabrennan.bsky.social

A new survey of 1,000 American adults found that the strongest supporters of transgender sports bans are not the people who admire women most: they are the people who hold the most hostile views about women. www.helenwebberley.com/news/transge...

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

exchange between a right wing Brazilian congressman and a left wing congressman is pretty brutal for the former

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

The “parent estrangement” panic should be understood as part of the same complex as anger at social media “censorship,” and demands for affirmative action for conservatives in academia. Conservatives simply think you should be forced to listen to their dogshit ideas, no matter how cruel.

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

every now & then someone on the anti-trans side will get cold feet about how openly ugly it's all getting—they want to keep the image of a nice, sensible centrist but it's never enough for them to get off the train

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

The fact that the president's doctors are giving him the dementia test over and over again -- tracking his decline, most likely -- and that the president keeps bragging about having to take that test should be a five-alarm fire.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

Trump: "You know, the first question -- they have a lion, a snake, a giraffe, and a bear. And they say 'which is the snake?' ... by the time you get to number five a lot of people are left out on the road ... I get no credit for it."

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

As it turns out, SoCal Strategies is also a fake pollster as well. Probably the same people involved too. This is becoming an epidemic

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

Replying to @lastpositivist.bsky.social

The story of the Republican party during Obama was the rubes taking over from the patricians who pandered to the rubes

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

El-Sayed: "People like Vance think America is too small for some of us. I think America is big enough. America has been big enough include people whose families came, were here before anybody else showed up, or who were brought here despite themselves. His view of America is small -- small like him"

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

MUST READ: Neil Bush, brother of one President Bush and son of another President Bush, explains why he voted for James Talarico. In part: “My vote was motivated by two things: deep concern about Ken Paxton's record and genuine admiration for the character and principles I see in James Talarico.”

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

I’ve been released from IDF custody with a “warning,” apparently because of my public profile (I told them I wasn’t even a congressmember yet, just a nominee). But several dozen rabbis & participants harvesting olives with me are still in detention.

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

holy smokes, conan strikes up a chat with a random lady on the subway and she immediately starts riffing on his level, no problem.

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

I will always remember Vivek Ramaswami as the freak whose vibes were too off to hang with the DOGE guys, and that group included Musk and a guy who ran a Satanist hacker group that extorted CSAM from minors.

This post is unavailable.

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

Billionaires throw a fit at the idea of an annual wealth tax... but literally everyone else already pays one via property taxes (either directly as a homeowner or secondarily as a renter). The only reason securities aren't taxed the same is because that's where the rich keep most of their wealth.

Matt Novak@paleofuture.bsky.social

“The borrowing let Ellison keep his stock and avoid locking in taxable gains, and highlighted how billionaires often employ a strategy called ‘buy, borrow and die’ to retain their wealth without selling assets.”

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

Replying to @vituperativeerb.bsky.social

“Does Ukraine think the successor CEO in the event of Musk’s sudden and untimely death will behave this erratically” is not something I’d want anyone in Ukraine to be thinking if I were Musk

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

the Titanic: famously a story about the importance of avoiding obvious disaster that results from hubris and error, rather than a story about how things have to get worse before they get better

FactPost@factpostnews.bsky.social

JD Vance on the economy: "You don't turn the Titanic around overnight"

(((John))) is mad on the Internet reposted

One of the central problems in the American cost crisis is that knowledge of costs, or lack thereof, is treated as a rhetorical weapon rather than verifiable objective truth

Mo Zhu@moinmybackyard.bsky.social

"The proponents for single stairs have it mapped out that it costs $200k for another stair. I have no way to verify that. I find it hard to believe that it would be that expensive."