Post

holy shit -- Schiff ties Trump's judicial nominees in knots by asking them who won the 2016 before *before* asking them who won in 2020, which results in them sounding like election deniers about Trump's victories!

2K reposts7.5K likes

They can't admit it, because they know Trump, his lackeys and their own competitors for the court seats are watching and saying anything Trump doesn't like would see their nomination withdrawn.

This is how GOP clowns answer the question when they think Trump will never hear it (because they thought grand jury proceedings would remain sealed):

DGM@notredale.bsky.social

Graham on the political question of our time.

As a matter of fact; and as a matter of law, #DJT is a useless treasonous bigoted pendejo that MUST be removed from office and incarcerated! bsky.app/profile/otro...

Eliana@otrodia.bsky.social

#FuckTrump #Epstein #FuckTheGOP Who remembers the little document called the #USConstitution? “President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States” shall be removed from office if convicted in an impeachment trial of “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

They need to rig up some sort of a machine. Maybe shock collars? Some sort of mechanical boot that kicks them in the nuts? Whenever they can’t answer this question in a straight, matter of fact, way - zzzzzcckt! Shock to the neck and booomp! Kick to the nuts.

One fact is clear about each of these judicial nominees: not one of them possesses any capacity for shame. (That is a trait of sociopaths.)

Question, has any of the Trump nominees been able to answer these simple election result questions with a yes or no? I would venture to say that they actually may get a good number of Dems to confirm their nomination in addition to most of the Republicans.

Yea, this isn’t the gotcha that appeals to the avg folk. These guys aren’t even saying anything, so you can’t even put it in an ad or whatever is the point. It’s not like they’re not getting confirmed.

Over coached and u able to just say yes when asked a question. Equivocating pieces of shit do afraid of the current administration that the can’t answer a simple question

But I want this job and he can still denounce me and withdraw my name. After my confirmation I will admit privately he takes sadistic pleasure in making the courtiers dance.

Honestly, at some point, Schiff et al. should throw in some school yard bullying or setups for some jokes. If these nominees thought they already lost all dignity with their sucking up to Trump, make them appear even more undignified

These election deniers are poisoning our legal system for a generation. 👇 bsky.app/profile/jben...

Jen Bendery@jbendery.bsky.social

Former J6 federal prosecutors are begging senators -- mostly GOPers, but a handful of Dems are in there, too -- to stop confirming election deniers to lifetime federal courts seats. “Please stop poisoning our courts." www.huffpost.com/entry/live-u...

I agree - the Dems should do everything they can to delay and obstruct these appointments. No one with this kind of willingness to disrespect the process is qualified as a candidate for any office that requires Senate confirmation.

Look part of me really wanted Schiff to just very explicitly say "it is very obvious you guys are full of shit because the chain of logic you espoused right before the question about the 2020 election came up sounded like normal answers and not like dodgy fucking bullshit. You fucking liars."

Yes of course. The system worked well in 2016, when their guy won, but was completely corrupt in 2020. Makes all the sense in the world. Every single Republican hosebag knows very well that Trump lost in 2020. That lie is just one of the many things that makes them repugnant human beings.

I have been wondering for what while why the questioners didn't do this. Ask them about other elections starting with Obama and then up through the 2024 election. That would include 2 Trump wins.

I'm so old, I remember when one proper noun could answer each of those questions. Judicial nominees, your humiliation rituals are giving Rump partial dementia mushroom boners right now, and I am SO here for it. I love this stuff. 🤣🤣🤣

gotta give him credit for being equally obtuse across all those elections, though. perhaps the initial question should be operationally defining a win based on the US constitution.

This bozo knew he got caught up when it happened and smiled when he realized the trap he was in. So tired of these losers, in the real world they wouldn’t survive 6 months without resorting to stealing or other violent crime.

I know people like fire breathing, charismatic candidates, but if you had more smart people like Schiff elected as Democrats? It would be good for the Democratic Party, and it would be good for the government and America

This is so embarrassing for y’all. These are people who are going to be tasked with adjudicating fact from fiction with lives and livelihoods on the line?

Good HELL! How pathetic and mealy mouthed can it get? These are judicial material?? God have mercy for anyone approaching their bench! 🤬👹🤬

If just one of these people had enough pride to say the truth, then we could see the response, if any. If Trump then pulled the nomination, the this Kabuki would be laid bare. If he left the nomination untouched, then perhaps, other nominees would not feel the need to so embarrass themselves.

no knots here tbh. they're very consistent. whatever route you take to certification doesn't matter. the result is all that matters. our modern concepts of democracy or legitimacy or power coming from the people don't matter either. their only regret from 1/6/2021 is they didn't succeed

"The Congress certified Trump as the winner of the 2016 election - but why did the Congress certify him? On what basis?" "What was the factual basis that supported such certification of Trump as the winner of the 2016 US Presidential election?" "Trump took the oath and was sworn in, WHY?"

Necessary follow up is "why" to all of these. Why did Congress certify the winner? What was the factual basis to support such certification? Why did [Obama/Trump/Biden] take the oath? What was the factual substantiation for [Obama/Trump/Biden] taking the oath of office. Disqualifying if no answer

What we Americans are failing to grasp is that the GOP is actively treasonous. We have (or had) the most secure elections in the world. To question it without facts is to sow doubt in our democracy. Which should be treated as an act of treason in and of itself

Finally. Since they started refusing to answer that question I've been waiting for someone to do that. Actually, I was hoping they'd do 2016 and 2024 first, then 2020, but still, finally.

Schiff will probably go and shake their hands afterwards like he did with Mullins. When will Democrats realize we are in the middle of an authoritarian take over?

Shiff should have asked him (presuming the guy's married of course) "Did you marry your wife?" and let him explain that because a license was applied for, he must have done.

Are thee people so F'ing ambitious to render themselves as complete fools. How can they live with themselves? How can they face their family, spouses, children and grandchildren. What rotted souls they possess.

None of these clown should be appointed. I hope the next president undoes everything done under Trump.

Why is all this beating around the bush necessary when everyone knows that they will play the stupid game of “we can’t say that he lost in 2020”. He should go straight for the jugular and call them cowards for being unable to publicly say that Trump lost in 2020. He is too polite.Embarrass them hard

Donald Trump has given orders to all his troops .... NOBODY will EVER say that the 2020 Presidential Election was legitimate, or that Joe Biden won that Election. NOBODY!

If you have to lie and obfuscate to get a job what do they think they will be asked to do after they get the job? You don’t get to just sell a little bit of your soul.

This guy sound so ridiculous trying to say that getting sworn in makes you the winner. That’s not how it works. You are entitled to be sworn in because you won. The winning comes first.

This is the most pathetic thing I’ve ever seen. Republicans have reduced to complete chickenshits. The USA has never in its history seen more pathetic excuses for public servants than we see today. This country is done; we’re just coasting on the past accomplishments of others, hoping it holds up.

Throw judicial nominees a curveball & ask: -Are you under duress? -What threats have been made regarding your testimony? -What promises or assurances have you been given? -Have you been asked (told, etc) to perjure yourself? -To mislead this committee? -Smth about evasive word games

Not necessarily applicable to all the nominees, but, to the extent possible, dig into their past legal work to find examples of them calling out evasive word games by others, esp by any currently on the bench. Show early that they understand the concept & condemn it, if possible.

Ask if the nominees can distinguish between questions of fact & of law, perhaps w brief explanations. Basic legal concepts. Then ask about electoral winners as a question of fact. If they say anything about "as a matter of law," now they're revealing they don't understand the distinction, DQ'ing.

The warped way all these guys talk about simple yes/no stuff is almost clinically schizophrenic. Are these intellectual deformities considered good candidates to be paid large taxpayer salaries?!? No wonder our Justice system is so easily manipulated. Whackadoodles making decisions.

In a serious country, anyone answering questions this way would lose their candidacy immediately and be escorted out. But here in the Upside Down, someone trying to be confirmed in an "anti trust" role, can play with words to deny the 2020 elecction. Let me soon wake from this global nightmare.