Post

I do appreciate why people are in some cases a bit squeamish about this Natalie Harp story and want to be careful not to malign her, but on the other hand I think she might be an actual Ghostbusters demon

Anyway it seems she has coworkers who are eager to anonymously share their stories with the press! So I imagine we'll be learning a lot more in the coming days

28 reposts1K likes

Guys like Axelrod having whatever the exact opposite of a killer instinct is is a big reason why we got rolled by the dumbest grossest brutes in history twice

Can somebody who’s still on Twitter tell him that he’s a tired hack who hasn’t worked on a successful campaign since 2012, when the most talented politician of our time won reelection no thanks to tired hacks like him? He’s actively hurting our party and has been for some time. For shame.

ossoff should reassure supporters concerned about sexism that he does not think Trump is capable of the physical act of lovemaking and he merely thinks she is his in home health aide/security blanket/diaper changer

It’s worth remembering that white people get to be “young” not just into their 30s but their 40s. Trump’s adult children get that treatment as well. Meanwhile, Black children as young as 8 get described as if they’re adults, and specifically criminal adults.

Her bone cancer/saved my life story is also a weird citation-needed MAHA-sounding thing, entirely backhanded by Trump slashing cancer research.

But I think someone who wakes up every day to be at his side, thinking Trump saved her life, never disagreeing & also looks exactly like his lifelong “type” is something we can say is obviously unhealthily gratifying to a narcissist entirely whether or not they have any sexual interactions at all

That was public almost two years ago, reported in the NYT. It’s just that she was one of a hundred outrageous stories about Trumpworld, most of which were honestly more important. What’s news today is the absolute tantrum the WH is throwing about her being mentioned by Ossoff.

I think this is the correct move from their perspective. Presently, he likes her a lot more than he likes you, because she's doing... Whatever it is he likes so much... And you aren't. So you can't openly gun for her. What you want, optimally, is the big guy to decide she is the problem.

Sure, that's why you do this before the Ossoff mention. Now he's got tons of people on the right defending Harp and blasting Ossoff. Will Trump dump Harp in that environment? I guess maybe he could convince her to step down voluntarily, but that still seems like an Ossoff win/Trump loss.

No, I'm saying the opposite. You don't say anything to him at all. Certainly not before. You don't want him thinking you have any thoughts at all about his uh, assistant. You talk behind her back to the press when they smell blood.

Frankly I have a lot more sympathy and respect for her than ANYONE else in any proximity to Trump. Because she is basically a creature. You work with Trump & have any pretense at self-respect or even humanity, you're worse. She's in it because she's a perverted beast. What's the others' excuse?

Does nobody LIKE how weird she is? This is next level. Whether it's sexual or ideology-fanatical or both. At some point this sort of freak loops back to wholesome. I am actually rooting for a happy ending for her (that involves her swallowing Trump whole, like a python).