Post

I'm curious. During the campaign, fact-checkers routinely dinged the Harris campaign for calling Project 2025 Trump's playbook, saying "Trump has denied this." Have any of them admitted how badly they got rolled in the most obvious of ways?

The New York Times@nytimes.com

During the campaign, Donald Trump swore he had “nothing to do with” Project 2025. Now, as president-elect, Trump has filled his administration with people who have ties to the right-wing policy blueprint that would overhaul the federal government. nyti.ms/3BhAxxA

2K reposts8.8K likes

Vance wrote the foreword for the book The bulk of the political media is generally a mess. You would think the ones always writing their first drafts of history would include the parts of the narrative tgat are onerous and that likely will determine the near future. But, nope. They often repeat lies

They all should have said what a handful of serious journalists did say: That the P25 authors are almost entirely from his previous administration; that it matches what he says in rallies; that it matches his official plan, Agenda whatever-it-was.

Yes, but that's sort of a long story. A lot of media outlets would not choose to spend that kind of time on it. Unfortunately, stopping at Trump's denial gives the casual listener a false impression.

I've often felt that journalists should challenge the listener to examine their beliefs more closely. Most anti-Trump rhetoric is immediately dismissed by those that most needed to hear it as simply oppo-speak. "You're a Democrat [or lying MSM outlet] so you would say that, wouldn't you."

What does it matter? Why would anyone trust anything that comes from the orange guy? There's no reason whatsoever, and the saddest part is that voters didn't care. I really hope that all those rooting for him are going to get royally as..f..ed.

accountability is for "the little people" Mike, its not as if these people have any skin in the game, it's always "sucks to be you" as we've kept receipts, noting his truthiness and whats in the platform and who is filling his campaign staff and coffers.

There was literal candid camera video of the project 2025 dude laying out the plan of purposefully downplaying it during the campaign FFS. Any fact checker who carried water for the Trump campaign on this issue failed to consider the actual facts.

Journalists are enaging in lazy ethics to avoid making hard decisions. They enable lies and misinformation to spread in the name of presenting themselves as credible sources of information, without recognizing that the damage done by the former is far more important than the latter.

Why CLEAR Blue Sky? Moses was about to die while his people were on the verge of their biggest military challenge. Moses: "Be strong and courageous. Do not fear or be in dread of them, for it is the Lord your God who goes with you. He will not leave or forsake you." Deut. 31:6. FEAR is all MAGA has.

Well, there were always those of us who knew better. We KNEW it was Trump's doing, no matter what anyone else said. Why didn't more people see the writing on the wall? When you select a VP that wrote the introduction?? What else was there to think??

Stating "Trump has denied this" is a fact. Most media stories would indicate he was lying by detailing how his words didn't match his actions, but to state Trump denied any involvement in Project 2025 is the truth. (I still say Biden should declare Trump a danger to the US and have him jailed.)

Agree,but were they rolled or was it reflexive bothsiderism and cowardice? Nothing was evermore obvious than that Trump was lying. Being afraid to call out lies and report the obvious truth meant they lied to their audience.

Are you kidding? Imaging a certain husband & wife writing team EVER admitting they were wrong or duped. Or the ex Rolling Stones guy who gives off serial killer vibes. Nope, never.

The thing is trump isn't picking these people. His people are. He's not that interested in any of this. Trump was and is a symptom. The disease is all those that run the show behind the scenes. They're the dangerous ones.

I really think a lot of news outlets were banking on Trump chaos moving subscriptions, and so they covered this race hoping the newsy candidate would win. They got the outcome they were aiming for

Never gonna happen.... Yet they knew. They can't deny it. They went out of their way to accommodate a known liar, disparage Harris, and leave voters with doubt. Well known long befits election cycle.⬇️

The thing that astounds me is that they believed him. He's a pathological liar and everyone knows it, so the fact they they thought for a second that he was being honest with his claim blows my mind.

To say they got “rolled” is being kind. It doesn’t seem possible to me that they actually believe anything that Trump says. They simply choose to report “just the quotes, ma’am” as if they were facts. It was and continues to be deeply irresponsible and destructive.

I've tried to avoid making a lot of post election back seat strategist comments, but I think for many voters, explaining what policies would be bad and why, was more important that referring to a document with a bland name that few have read.

They can quote his denials, but then decent honest journalists (?) find out exactly how many times the 100+ people who wrote Project 2025 visited and how often Trump in the last six months before the election. They know and choose not to print.

I am esteemed fact-checker Glenn Kessler. The assertion that my colleagues & I were “rolled” is false, as we simply reported exactly what Trump said without considering whether he might be blatantly lying, which is our job, according to us. We award your claim fifty Pinocchios. Subscribe to my newsl

Um, I’d like to see links to the actual fact checks under discussion to make sense of the claim here. Fact checking is a completely different activity to interpreting someone’s intentions or predicting someone’s future actions.

No. And they won't. They. Wanted. Him. To. Win. He's good for clicks and that's literally all they care about. It's that simple. Really. Please stop pretending modern news has standards, credibility or ethics. They don't. And we should ridicule any journalist who continues to contribute to them.

Still happening today. Trump isn’t even president yet but Biden barely in the news and policy being made from Mar a Lago. Even world leaders are just following America’s narrative at this point. The “news” world order.

They didn't get rolled. They played along with Trump for some reason. Anyone with half a brain could see from who was involved and the policies proposed that P 2025 and Trump were completely connected. It was not a secret.