I wrote section 230 to protect the little guys and the upstarts like Bluesky. Repealing section 230 only helps Meta, Musk, and Donald Trump.
3.5K reposts16.2K likes
I wrote section 230 to protect the little guys and the upstarts like Bluesky. Repealing section 230 only helps Meta, Musk, and Donald Trump.
3.5K reposts16.2K likes
@durbin.senate.gov please reconsider your support for repealing 230.
Adding to your argument here, Senator. Project 2025 explicitly proposes undoing your work. static.project2025.org/2025_Mandate...
YouTube copyright strikes demonetizing or removing people's videos for containing three seconds of a copyrighted song: abused by the police, who now routinely play copyrighted music when they're doing something they don't want streamed or made public, because they know it makes YouTube take it down.
You should maybe explain that to this guy: bsky.app/profile/durb...
It’s time to repeal Section 230. We must be able to take social media companies to court for addicting kids and enabling drug trafficking on their platforms.
www.thefire.org/news/why-rep... “The answer isn’t to harness govt power to control private platforms’ editorial decisions. Repealing or undermining Section 230 would lead only to less expressive freedom and viewpoint diversity online — to the detriment of us all.”
There’s a difference (especially lately) between on-paper liability and actual real world liability. Here’s a gaming example: PvP is allowed on the server. There’s some super-rare kit that only 2-3 players can afford. Who do you think will win? I am inclined to agree with @wyden.senate.gov
Hey I’m liking your post because I think discourse is important. We’re both commenting in the thread of the person who wrote this section of law. Nobody “should” get away with disinformation. @wyden.senate.gov is pointing out that this could be a moment used to turn against what you (and I) want.
Can you talk to Durbin talk? bsky.app/profile/durb...
It’s time to repeal Section 230. We must be able to take social media companies to court for addicting kids and enabling drug trafficking on their platforms.
Can you explain it to @durbin.senate.gov ? Cause this goes doesn’t seem to understand anything and is a disaster in a leadership position. It’s not 2005
There is no such thing as coincidence. There was a reason Trump wanted to inspect the code used in Dominion voting machines. I urge you to demand investigation into swing srate voting anomalies & inconsistencies in bullet ballots in Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona. open.substack.com/pub/planetcr...
You could not possibly be more wrong. bsky.app/profile/raha...
Your regular reminder that §230 protects YOU, the person reading this post, from being sued for reposting things just as much as it protects "Big Tech" from things that still wouldn't be a viable cause of action because your problem is not with §230, it's with the first amendment
you are a hero. dems that did nothing are cowards, those that voted for your censure are traitors and should be primaried and voted out. @hakeemjefferson.bsky.social @housedemocrats.bsky.social @kenmartin.bsky.social
THIS would be really, really bad. Brad Bondi represented Tesla /Musk against the S.E.C. Gave $25,000+ to Trump political comte's. Owns $3 mill. of Trump Media. Aslo running, Ed Martin’s Asst & DC Attorney Alicia Long for treasurer to control DC’s ethical watchdog www.nytimes.com/2025/03/05/u...
Hey, Dick @durbin.senate.gov might wanna pause and talk to your colleague here
Talk some sense into this dude please bsky.app/profile/durb...
It’s time to repeal Section 230. We must be able to take social media companies to court for addicting kids and enabling drug trafficking on their platforms.
After that do @blumenthal.senate.gov newrepublic.com/post/189352/...
Can you please remind our dude @durbin.senate.gov of that? His constituents keep asking him to stand up to Musk and Trump, and instead, he’s out here rallying against these protections in the name of “protecting kids”.