We’re hiring in Cambridge CS! Assistant/Associate Professor position in AI and machine learning, including learning theory and related areas of theoretical computer science.
Apply here: www.cam.ac.uk/jobs/univers...
From @anildash.comwww.anildash.com/2026/09/09/c...
"Because these firms are committed to their ideological agendas, if they do see an idea they like, but they don't like the morals of the founder who pitched it (i.e. the founder has morals) they could..."
"... elect to merely choose someone in their network to create a clone of the idea, and then hyper-fund that clone in order to kill the company that just pitched them... a sycophant who'll take whatever you offer and execute the ideas laid out in the manifesto on your fund's homepage"
Hmmm.
When I teach linear I like to point out that the mathematical use comes via gardening. Womb -> a growing place -> a garden plot with lines of string to make a grid to put a regular array of seeds -> an array of numbers each with its designated spot.
No one should be taken seriously when they say things like “update my priors” unless they can explain how to derive the Kalman filter. Desperate times call for desperate measures, people!
After reading some of the recent pubs and discourse around US higher ed.… I should just stop right here. But here are the three major fallacies of much of what’s out there, three contexts that are missing, and the one big thing that is driving me around the bend (actually already there, but). 1/
“The trouble with you, Spode, is that just because you have succeeded in inducing a handful of half-wits to disfigure the London scene by going about in black shorts, you think you’re someone. You hear them shouting “Heil, Spode!” and you imagine it is the Voice of the People.” Bertie Wooster
1. Recently I’ve received lots of emails from people I don’t know personally, asking for my feedback on their books or papers. They explain the connection between my work and theirs and ask me to take a look.
The catch, of course, is that the emails are transparently, obviously, written by AI.
PSA OTD: just because a paper uses crappy notation doesn't mean you need to as well!
This goes quadruple for people who have outsourced their brains to genAI.
Is there a technical term for when an organization pre-capitulates to unspecified demands? Besides cowardice that is.
Asking for a friend^H^H^H^H^H^Hprofessional society.
Hear me out: one of those "cafe order filling" mobile games, only you are an editor at a journal and have to manage the review process. Later levels introduce LLM-generated papers and reviews. Not sure what the score should be: impact factor is probably not so good...
TMLR has been facing an significant uptick in the number of submissions since the start of 2026. This is placing an extreme burden on our amazing team of reviewers & action editors.
To ease this burden, TMLR will be implementing submission quotas, effective July 1. 1/n
medium.com/@TmlrOrg/ann...
So many recent reasons to look forward to sabbatical: the demolishing of postgraduate research in the US, Rutgers Engineering making a huge mistake and a comically ham-fisted blustering excuse, the Canvas hack...
Is a sabbatical fiddling while it burns or a time-out in the corner with a dunce cap?
Breaking: Trump has fired the membership of the National Science Board, which is oversees NSF.
I have confirmed separately with multiple now-former members of NSB.
davidbessis.substack.com/p/the-fall-o...
An interesting read, with lots of food for thought. It reminds me of my enthusiasm for "mathematical clean-up work", i.e. going back to the foundations of a topic, making the constants sharper, proofs nicer (and more modern), and the like.
Stop what you're doing and read this absolute miracle of an OMNI Magazine interview with Claude Shannon on @archive.org:
- "I am always building totally useless gadgets just because they're fun to make. They have no commercial value but may be amusing."
🔗 archive.org/details/omni...
The fact that EDAS cannot handle $$ for LaTeX markup is just gross incompetence on the part of the designers. OFC, it's also a terrible product in so many other ways...
i shouldn’t give this piece any more attention than it has already garnered but i feel like it is worth pointing out some flaws in the argument/unquestioned assumptions
thread 1/
My most influential educator was my grade school librarian, Dorothy Vickers-Shelley. She made us recite a pledge each time:
"Life is short. Therefore I shall be a crusader in the fight against ignorance and fear, beginning with myself."
Engraved on me at age 5: a charge that I aspire to fulfill.
BREAKING: The Department of Education has ended its directive that attempted to restrict diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in schools nationwide.
This is a victory for academic freedom and education equity.
Someone should gift my senator, Chuck Schumer, a copy of Max Frisch’s Biedermann und die Brandstifter.
I am guessing he does not know German, but I can’t find a translation in Spinelesscowardese so maybe English will have to do.
Perhaps he will need some Cliff‘s Notes.
In case anyone is on the academic job market and has an upcoming online video interview:
* do some research on the department: what classes can you teach, who can you collaborate with?
* be able to answer "why do you want to come here" with something more concrete than "because you are great..."
Basically: do your homework and think through how *this job* and not just *any job* is right for you. If you can't be bothered to do that, will you even be able to write a grant proposal?
Finally: you don't know what it's like here. Ask questions! Be curious! Show you're interested!
This thread brought to you by being on too many search committees and being tired of having my time wasted. I'm more angry at the candidate's advisor(s), who likely never told them this, thinking it's "obvious" or "back in my day we didn't have Zoom interviews..."
In case anyone is on the academic job market and has an upcoming online video interview:
* do some research on the department: what classes can you teach, who can you collaborate with?
* be able to answer "why do you want to come here" with something more concrete than "because you are great..."
This is not saying that if you have reasons you don't want to disclose (e.g. partner has a job in the area, a.k.a. the "two body problem" [this term is dumb, stop using it!]) you should reveal them. But if you say something super generic it will sound like you already think we are mid.
There is no notion of "safety school". If you sound like you'd take an offer while holding your nose, it will be pretty clear.
It's also clear if you try obvious/trite hyperbole: "I want to come because you are a world-class institution!"
In case anyone is on the academic job market and has an upcoming online video interview:
* do some research on the department: what classes can you teach, who can you collaborate with?
* be able to answer "why do you want to come here" with something more concrete than "because you are great..."
My department is definitely not top-10 in the rankings. We also don't have a ton of resources for on-campus interviews.
If you are not actually serious about accepting an offer, we won't bother interviewing you. There are tons of excellent candidates.
ICLR AC: "The scores were too low, reject. Reviewer A's score was the lowest."
Also ICLR AC: "Reviewer A was marked as AI generated."
Also also ICLR AC: "Reviewer A is unlikely to raise their score."
It's ok to reject the paper, but come on...
“When we use terms like ‘output,’ ‘feedback,’ ’interface,’ and ‘networking’ to express the transactions of everyday life, we reveal how thoroughly artificial things now shape our sense of human being.” -Langdon Winner, “The Whale and the Reactor” (Preface)
JD Vance claims that diversity weakens unions, as people end up distrusting each other and not organizing.
Let me tell you two menswear stories related to this claim. 🧵
Worn, vintage yet precious to my heart. Souvenir: a mousepad from #ISIT 1998, the International Symposium on Information Theory, in honor of Claude E. Shannon 1948 paper, "A mathematical theory of communication", where I was a lucky voluntary student.